Date
1 - 4 of 4
Binding an App to the controller hostname
|
Tim Lawrence
Hi all,
We have been testing one of our CF deployments and have found that we can deploy an app bound to the "api" hostname. eg "api.domain.com". It appears that the router then forwards traffic to this app rather than the CF API. Clearly this is a fairly big problem for us. This deployment is not currently completely up to date so wondered if anyone else has seen this and if it has patched this in a subsequent release? |
|
|
|
James Leavers
Hi,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Do you have separate system & app domains in your manifest? E.g. properties: domain: DOMAIN system_domain: SYSTEM_DOMAIN app_domains: - APP_DOMAIN If so you would be able to push an app to api.APP_DOMAIN, as the cf api is on api.SYS_DOMAIN. James On 15 February 2016 at 17:15:00, Tim Lawrence (da_rude2k2(a)yahoo.co.uk) wrote:
Hi all, We have been testing one of our CF deployments and have found that we can deploy an app bound to the "api" hostname. eg "api.domain.com". It appears that the router then forwards traffic to this app rather than the CF API. Clearly this is a fairly big problem for us. This deployment is not currently completely up to date so wondered if anyone else has seen this and if it has patched this in a subsequent release? |
|
|
|
Jesse T. Alford
Tim,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Alternatively, if you don't want to have a separate system domain for whatever reason, I recommend you create a "system" org and space with the admin account and use create-route to reserve any routes you'd like to make unavailable for use by apps on the shared domain. Having a separate system domain is definitely cleaner, but if that doesn't work for you, this should help. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:12 PM James Leavers <james(a)cloudhelix.io> wrote:
Hi, |
|
|
|
Tim Lawrence
Thanks,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I guessed this would be the recommendation. I was slightly surprised there is no function for this built in. The suggestion about adding routes In a system domain is good too although do you think there is any value in a system wide "reserved routes" feature? One which didn't require a system org.. Sent from my iPad On 16 Feb 2016, at 10:11, James Leavers <james(a)cloudhelix.io> wrote: |
|
|