Date
1 - 8 of 8
Security group rules to allow HTTP communication between 2 apps deployed on CF
Ahmad Ferdous Bin Alam
Hi,
I have deployed two node.js (express) applications - App1 and App2 - on a CF local instance. App2 consumes a service exposed (REST API) by App1. When App2 receives a request, it needs to communicate with App1. It worked all good when I tested. Once they are deployed on CF, it didn't work. It turned out that App2 got error 'connect ECONNREFUSED'. I thought it might be a security group rule issue that prevented outbound traffic to App1. So I added a security group allowing all outgoing traffic. But it didn't help. Now I think it may have to do with inbound traffic rule. I searched for documentation as to how inbound traffic rules can be added but couldn't find. My questions are: 1) Is it possible at all to have 2 apps deployed on CF communication with each other over HTTP? 2) Is the security group given below correct? Its purpose is to allow all outgoing traffic. 3) Is there any way we can add inbound traffic 'allow' rules? Please help. Additional info: - I have CF locally installed as a Vagrant devbox (host Ubuntu 14.04). I used NISE installer: https://github.com/yudai/cf_nise_installer - I added the following security group to allow all outgoing traffic. I bound it to both staging and running security groups and finally restarted the apps so that the rules get applied. [ { "protocol":"tcp", "destination":"0.0.0.0/0", "ports":"1-65535" }, { "protocol":"udp", "destination":"0.0.0.0/0", "ports":"1-65535" } ] |
|
Daniel Mikusa
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Ahmad Ferdous Bin Alam <
ahmadferdous(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi, How are you trying to connect to App1 from App2? If you access App2's URL, it should work? i.e. app-2.your-cf-domain.com I thought it might be a security group rule issue that prevented outbound For inbound traffic, the restriction is HTTP, HTTPS & WebSockets. I don't believe there are any further restrictions. I searched for documentation as to how inbound traffic rules can be addedYes. If you deploy App2 and have it send a request to App1, that should work as long as you use the URL for App1. 2) Is the security group given below correct? Its purpose is to allow allThis is the group I've used to allow everything. What you've entered looks OK too. [ { "destination": "0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255", "protocol": "all" } ] Don't forget to bind the security group to your space or to the running / staging groups. Also, I think you need to restart or restage your app so it's container gets recreated with the new rules. 3) Is there any way we can add inbound traffic 'allow' rules? Shouldn't be necessary. Dan
|
|
Naveen Asapu
How to get destination address for bluemix.net can you suggest any command for getting destination address
actually i'm creating security group for abacus for that it needs destination address how can i get command: cf create-security-group abacus abacus_group.json error: Creating security group abacus as xxxx(a)xxxx.in FAILED Server error, status code: 403, error code: 10003, message: You are not authorized to perform the requested action |
|
Matthew Sykes <matthew.sykes@...>
I'm afraid I don't really understand your questions or what you're trying
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
to accomplish. Security groups intended to be managed by platform administrators so unless you have admin access to your target environment, you will not be able to create security groups. If you're trying to access the cloud controller api or other applications, you should be going through the front door (the external host names). The security group rules should not be preventing you from doing that. If you're trying to access something internal to the cloud foundry deployment, you will need explicit support from the administrators. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Naveen Asapu <asapu.naveen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How to get destination address for bluemix.net can you suggest any --
Matthew Sykes matthew.sykes(a)gmail.com |
|
Naveen Asapu
Hi Matthew Sykes,
Actually I'm trying to monitor usage of app in bluemix. for that i'm using cf-abacus in the example steps this command also there. can u suggest how to monitor app usage using curl and cloudfoundary -- Thanks Naveen Asapu |
|
Denilson Nastacio <dnastacio@...>
The message indicates this problem is unrelated to security groups. You
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
would get something like "host not found" instead of "connection refused". Which version of CF are you using? Can you curl a url from app2 at all? On Wed, Sep 23, 2015, 3:27 AM Naveen Asapu <asapu.naveen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Matthew Sykes, |
|
Naveen Asapu
I'm using cf version 6.12.1
|
|
CF Runtime
Containers have a default iptables rule for REJECT all traffic. If there is
not a security group configured to allow the traffic to the destination, you'll get a connection refused. Security groups can only be created and configured by admin users. Your only option is probably to have one app connect to the other using the public route bound to that app. Joseph CF Release Integration Team On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Denilson Nastacio <dnastacio(a)gmail.com> wrote: The message indicates this problem is unrelated to security groups. You |
|