Big shoutout to the awesome Eirini team and contributing companies. Y'all rock! From: "Krannich, Bernd" <bernd.krannich@sap.com> To: "cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org" <cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org> Dat

Johannes, just echoing what Neil is saying below: We also feel that three months is probably too short of a runway for this. Let's discuss the details, but 3 months is likely not good enough for us, t

+1. Our main intent certainly was to avoid certification FUD in case we accomplish a "mature" Eirini in the first half or 2019. To me ammeding the requirements with a mid-term update does address this

Hi Steve, I realized way too late that I should have even recognized the questions ... totally my bad, should have ignored :-( Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Simon Moser Senior Technical Staff

#cf

no. not true. Where did you read that ? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Simon Moser Senior Technical Staff Member / IBM Master Inventor Bluemix Application Platform Lead Architect Dept. C727, I

#cf

It's derived from the CF system domain. If your CF system domain is "mycf.com", the app would be "myApp.mycf.com" Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Simon Moser Senior Technical Staff Member / IBM

#cf

yes it can. I think per default they would have to get differnt routes though (although I think there is a way to even overcome that in case you really want, but that surely is a special use-case) Mit

#cf

Depends how you define "administrative" I guess. Org is definitly higher than Space (an org can contain 1--N spaces), and roles & membership rights are controlled on the org/space level Quota is a bit

#cf

While i agree that Eirini needs more Battle-testing and production evaluation still, i think the key is this not a certification *requirement*, but rather a *certification option*. From my point of vi

Hello all, IBM is nominating Peter Goetz for the CF Bits Service Project Lead in the Application Runtime PMC. Peter is a Software Engineer at IBM working both as a core contributor to the Cloud Foundr

late to the party ... added the bits-service part in the end From: Dieu Cao <dcao(a)pivotal.io> To: cf-dev <cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org> Date: 21/09/2017 10:11 Subject: [cf-dev] [INFO] Bi-Weekly R

ps: forgot to mention that openStack Swift is of course in scope, too. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Simon Moser Senior Technical Staff Member / IBM Master Inventor Bluemix Application Platfo

Hi everybody, we are beginning work on the Bits Service proposed here [1] for handling all kinds of blobstore related operations - a functionality that is in the cloud controller today. Cloud controll

Hi everybody, We have been putting together a proposal for a "bits service" - basically a service that will take bits (packages, droplets, etc) and provide upload/download capabilities for those. It's

Hi Ponraj, #1) Because IRD can quickly become quite expensive DB query wise, since it would follow all relations given your query. Eg v2/organizations with IRD 2 or 3 would drag along A LOT of things,

Hi cloud foundry community, it is my pleasure to announce a new cloud foundry team. The main focus of this new team in the first few months will be on Performance as well as developing an Event Broadc

Hi Kayode, what you can do to avoid downtime is to push your app to a temp name and then, after the push is successfull, just switch the route to the app with the temp name. Not sure there is a built-