|
Maximum size limitation of Diego apps' routes
Hi Eric, thanks for the background story. It's even better to completely eliminate the Routes field size. Please kindly communicate once it's known when this will happen. Thanks, Jason
Hi Eric, thanks for the background story. It's even better to completely eliminate the Routes field size. Please kindly communicate once it's known when this will happen. Thanks, Jason
|
By
Jason Huang
· #6816
·
|
|
Maximum size limitation of Diego apps' routes
We wanted to have the ability to keep some customers on version x of an app and some on version x+1. While we are looking into a change on our side, can someone share with us the reason of the limit i
We wanted to have the ability to keep some customers on version x of an app and some on version x+1. While we are looking into a change on our side, can someone share with us the reason of the limit i
|
By
Jason Huang
· #6813
·
|
|
Maximum size limitation of Diego apps' routes
Daniel, Our apps support multi-tenancy and our customers are enterprise customers. For each subscription, there is unique ur which is mapped to the same app. Therefore for 500 subscriptions there are
Daniel, Our apps support multi-tenancy and our customers are enterprise customers. For each subscription, there is unique ur which is mapped to the same app. Therefore for 500 subscriptions there are
|
By
Jason Huang
· #6807
·
|
|
How to tune ETCD performance for bbs job
Do you know what was used as the Diego store in the test reported below? Is it etcd or a relational database? If the later, what was it? https://content.pivotal.io/blog/250k-containers-in-production-a
Do you know what was used as the Diego store in the test reported below? Is it etcd or a relational database? If the later, what was it? https://content.pivotal.io/blog/250k-containers-in-production-a
|
By
Jason Huang
· #6750
·
|
|
Cloud Foundry Diego v1.0.0 released, starting EOL schedule for DEAs
Hi Eric, It's great to see that "The Diego team has succeeded in running 200,000 CF apps with a total of 250,000 instances on a large, Diego-backed CF deployment on GCP.". Do you know how many cells a
Hi Eric, It's great to see that "The Diego team has succeeded in running 200,000 CF apps with a total of 250,000 instances on a large, Diego-backed CF deployment on GCP.". Do you know how many cells a
|
By
Jason Huang
· #6183
·
|
|
App failed to startup or crashed
Sorry my previous email was not meant for the group. It was for Phong only. :-). But since I am on it, let me gave more details on what we have seen before. What we encountered before was that the upg
Sorry my previous email was not meant for the group. It was for Phong only. :-). But since I am on it, let me gave more details on what we have seen before. What we encountered before was that the upg
|
By
Jason Huang
· #6172
·
|
|
App failed to startup or crashed
I see a reply saying that it is likely because there is not enough entropy. We had the problem before. Likely the problem is not enough entropy in /dev/random. You can try to use /dev/urandom instead
I see a reply saying that it is likely because there is not enough entropy. We had the problem before. Likely the problem is not enough entropy in /dev/random. You can try to use /dev/urandom instead
|
By
Jason Huang
· #6168
·
|
|
When will dea be replaced by diego?
is this question answered? In other words, can we expect that DEA will continue to be available and supported in new CF releases in year 2016 and beyond? Thanks, Jason
is this question answered? In other words, can we expect that DEA will continue to be available and supported in new CF releases in year 2016 and beyond? Thanks, Jason
|
By
Jason Huang
· #2458
·
|
|
What ports will be needed to support hm and loggregator
Yes he also listens to udp4. By allowing udp 3456 and 3457, it worked. Do you know why 3457 is used when the incoming listening port for loggregator is specified as 3456? Sent from my iPhone
Yes he also listens to udp4. By allowing udp 3456 and 3457, it worked. Do you know why 3457 is used when the incoming listening port for loggregator is specified as 3456? Sent from my iPhone
|
By
Jason Huang
· #351
·
|