Shannon, Sorry for my late response. I haven't been noticed your reponse until a person let me know. Thank you for telling me about the proposal document Now I have a question about it. What is the st

Hello Routing team, Has this (="Routing for Isolation Segments") feature released already? This week I've found the following two articles: - https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/adminguide/routing-is.html -

Sorry for resurrecting an old thread. Is there any progress on this issue? Recently one of our users also needs to get org and space info from environment variables. I've checked the story[1] Nick men

Hi Preetam, I've published my own sequences of operations to validate multiple app ports feature[1]. **NOTE**: For TCP apps, your CF environment *MUST* support TCP Routing[2]. If your CF doesn't suppo

Thank you Mike for telling me the story I didn't know. It's OK if the multiple app ports feature will or may be supported in the container networking. #But I don't know if the container networking can

Thank you very much for the response, Zach, I've heard it multiple times from our users who wanted to migrate their existing application(s) onto Cloud Foundry that they need to use multiple ports with

Dear team, Yesterday I've found that Cloud Foundry supports multiple app ports from cf-acceptance-tests [1]. So I've looked for document(s) describing how to utilize multiple ports for an app in docs.

Hello Eric-san, Thank you for the response. I think I have grasped the current status of the "isolation segments for compute tier". Yes, we have been just evaluating it. So there's no actual usage for

Sandy-san, Thank you for the responses. The situation has become clear. I'm glad to hear that a cell will probably be able to belong multiple ISs in the future. Sandy Cash Jr wrote ----- I'm not a ...

Hi team, Recently I've been trying Isolation Segments for compute tier. In the official document, it is required to deploy one or more cells with `diego.rep.placement_tags` to utilize the isolation se

Hi nitin, I think "overcommit" is basically for CF operators, not for CF users. The object is to make good utilization of physical resource. Imagine there are app instances whose disk quota is 1GB and

It depends on the configuration of DEA. DEA has two disk-related properties: `disk_mb` and `disk_overcommit_factor` [1]. disk_mb is disk capacity assigned to app instances running on a DEA, and disk_o

It seems that, with the current implementation, there's no way to disable ssh by default while configuring `cc.allow_app_ssh_access` as true. It is since the default value of `allow_ssh` for a space i

Hi peter, DEA's file descriptor limit and application's one are two different things. An application's file descriptor limit is defined as a property of the process of the application instance running

Hello Nick, Thank you for your kind response. I've made up a collection of information related behaviors with "suspended" organization. https://gist.github.com/nota-ja/287bdc3299d0c2847085f865b9f2e58d

Thank you, Nicholas, While the linked documents seems for me to tell almost nothing about 'suspended' orgs, your explanation is very helpful. I understood its objective and how to use. The last thing

Hi CF guys, Is there any document / information about the status "suspended" of an org? I've found so many codes about it [1], but cannot find any document in docs.cloudfoundry.org [2]. I want to know

I haven't have time for writing code to fix this problem. So if you want, please create an issue for this. Regards, Selvaguru Manokaran wrote ----- I'm not a ... noburou taniguchi -- View this message

for dev lab. I don't know. If you just want to try Route Service, it would be much easier to use pcfdev [1]. [1] https://github.com/pivotal-cf/pcfdev Nishant Kumar Sinha wrote ----- I'm not a ... nobu

Thank you, Dieu, We will keep tracking Runtime PMC notes. Also looking forward to your presentation at CF Summit Europe. Dieu Cao wrote ----- I'm not a ... noburou taniguchi -- View this message in co