|
cf7 beta CLI is available
Congratulations on making it to this milestone, VAT and CLI teams! I know a lot of hours and work have gone into this, so this is a very special release. I’m very excited for the coming feedback. I kn
Congratulations on making it to this milestone, VAT and CLI teams! I know a lot of hours and work have gone into this, so this is a very special release. I’m very excited for the coming feedback. I kn
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #8717
·
|
|
New PM for CF AutoScaler project [Re: PM Vacancy for Auto-Scaler]
Welcome to the project, Bo!
Welcome to the project, Bo!
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #8127
·
|
|
Independent AZs deployments vs. streched deployments
I can’t speak for Consul nor Etcd, but cf-MySQL, in HA mode, can be deployed in a 2+1 mode where you’re still deploying an odd number of VMs, for consensus, but only deployed to two AZs. This gives yo
I can’t speak for Consul nor Etcd, but cf-MySQL, in HA mode, can be deployed in a 2+1 mode where you’re still deploying an odd number of VMs, for consensus, but only deployed to two AZs. This gives yo
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #7656
·
|
|
How stateless are service brokers?
Matt, cf-mysql-broker is stateful. We have a feature of the service plans which defines how much storage a plan may use; this isn't a core feature of MySQL. We leverage the fact that we have a DB at o
Matt, cf-mysql-broker is stateful. We have a feature of the service plans which defines how much storage a plan may use; this isn't a core feature of MySQL. We leverage the fact that we have a DB at o
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #7390
·
|
|
Announcing cf-mysql-release v35
Hi Juan Pablo, At the time we chose to go with MariaDB, our goal was to provide a "MySQL-compatible" relational DB for CF. Also at the time, MariaDB claimed to be a drop-in replacement; and to some ex
Hi Juan Pablo, At the time we chose to go with MariaDB, our goal was to provide a "MySQL-compatible" relational DB for CF. Also at the time, MariaDB claimed to be a drop-in replacement; and to some ex
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #6794
·
|
|
Announcing cf-mysql-release v35
On behalf of the Core Services team, I'm happy to announce that we've recently published cf-mysql-release v35 <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-mysql-release/releases/tag/v35>. The major motivation
On behalf of the Core Services team, I'm happy to announce that we've recently published cf-mysql-release v35 <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-mysql-release/releases/tag/v35>. The major motivation
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #6788
·
|
|
Announcing cf-mysql-release v34, and a quick poll
Yes, I can do that! wrote:
Yes, I can do that! wrote:
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #6418
·
|
|
Announcing cf-mysql-release v34, and a quick poll
Hi all! On behalf of the Core Services engineering team, I’m happy to announce that we’ve recently published cf-mysql-release v34 <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-mysql-release/releases/tag/v34>. I
Hi all! On behalf of the Core Services engineering team, I’m happy to announce that we’ve recently published cf-mysql-release v34 <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-mysql-release/releases/tag/v34>. I
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #6415
·
|
|
Routing-release 0.144.0: Gorouter performance improvements
So glad to see this announcement. I know the team has traveled a long way to get here; congrats!
So glad to see this announcement. I know the team has traveled a long way to get here; congrats!
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #6377
·
|
|
Meet the new CF container networking stack!
Ok, now I've read it. Brava, Usha! Anything that evolves us away from ASG's is a win in my book. wrote:
Ok, now I've read it. Brava, Usha! Anything that evolves us away from ASG's is a win in my book. wrote:
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #6021
·
|
|
Proposal to move cf-riak-cs-release to the cloudfoundry-attic
Hi cf-dev, I would like to propose that we transition the Riak CS BOSH release [1] to end of support and development. Once, we had hoped that Riak CS would be used as the blob store for Cloud Foundry
Hi cf-dev, I would like to propose that we transition the Riak CS BOSH release [1] to end of support and development. Once, we had hoped that Riak CS would be used as the blob store for Cloud Foundry
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #5827
·
|
|
Problem on binding service instance with an app
At first glance, it looks like your own broker server is returning 502 when CC attempts to issue the bind request. Do you see anything which corresponds to the request in your broker's logs? wrote:
At first glance, it looks like your own broker server is returning 502 when CC attempts to issue the bind request. Do you see anything which corresponds to the request in your broker's logs? wrote:
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #5587
·
|
|
Buildpacks PM change
Although I don't think I have any official vote, +1! The Buildpacks PM job is among the most demanding, because the breadth of scope is so broad. I thoroughly enjoyed working with Stephen while implem
Although I don't think I have any official vote, +1! The Buildpacks PM job is among the most demanding, because the breadth of scope is so broad. I thoroughly enjoyed working with Stephen while implem
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #5504
·
|
|
Building Cloud Foundry from source
Shahid, Cf-release isn't a single binary or even a set of binaries that you first compile, then deploy. Instead, cf-release is actu a set of software packages that are compiled as part of the deployme
Shahid, Cf-release isn't a single binary or even a set of binaries that you first compile, then deploy. Instead, cf-release is actu a set of software packages that are compiled as part of the deployme
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #5447
·
|
|
Building Cloud Foundry from source
Shahid, Cf-release isn't a single binary or even a set of binaries that you first compile, then deploy. Instead, cf-release is a set of software packages that are automatically compiled from source as
Shahid, Cf-release isn't a single binary or even a set of binaries that you first compile, then deploy. Instead, cf-release is a set of software packages that are automatically compiled from source as
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #5446
·
|
|
Status of cf-mysql-release v27
Hi Mike, I know it's been a bit longer than usual, but we're finally winding down. We're shooting for roughly the end of July. Love to hear what changes (aside from audit logs, which you've already ta
Hi Mike, I know it's been a bit longer than usual, but we're finally winding down. We're shooting for roughly the end of July. Love to hear what changes (aside from audit logs, which you've already ta
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #5325
·
|
|
答复: Re: Incubation request: App Auto-Scaling service
I'm sure there are many strong opinions about which is the best way to go, MySQL or Postgres. But I suppose it's OK for me to mention that the CF Foundation project, cf-mysql <https://github.com/cloud
I'm sure there are many strong opinions about which is the best way to go, MySQL or Postgres. But I suppose it's OK for me to mention that the CF Foundation project, cf-mysql <https://github.com/cloud
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #4336
·
|
|
cf v231: Issue with new webdav blobstore job
We solved a similar problem in MySQL by doing that work in a pre-start <https://bosh.io/docs/pre-start.html> script. Timeouts don't apply to pre- and post-start phases, so you can do lengthy transform
We solved a similar problem in MySQL by doing that work in a pre-start <https://bosh.io/docs/pre-start.html> script. Timeouts don't apply to pre- and post-start phases, so you can do lengthy transform
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #4289
·
|
|
Announcing cf-mysql-release v26, now with a slimmer VM footprint!
wrote: Yeah, I acknowledge that it's a significant impact, and I regret that we weren't able to come up with an easier way to do it. However, in order to make a material difference in how difficult it
wrote: Yeah, I acknowledge that it's a significant impact, and I regret that we weren't able to come up with an easier way to do it. However, in order to make a material difference in how difficult it
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #4218
·
|
|
Announcing cf-mysql-release v26, now with a slimmer VM footprint!
Hi Benjamin, Sorry for the delayed response! There are technically no trade-offs when using an Arbitrator, with the sole exception that you're sacrificing an extra level of data redundancy by keeping
Hi Benjamin, Sorry for the delayed response! There are technically no trade-offs when using an Arbitrator, with the sole exception that you're sacrificing an extra level of data redundancy by keeping
|
By
Marco Nicosia
· #4001
·
|