We have several use cases - in time event processing for usage, with notification instead of polling we'll be able to keep up better, getting closer to real time for metering, and thus rating and bill

Hi, I am also looking at runtime submissions for Abacus, worked on it for Bluemix, couple of points for discussion. In addition to usage events (start followed by stop), the scaling and duplicate even

Joseph, thank you, for the timestamps I just pointed it out as something that implementation must deal with, quite easily as the order is correct. For the duplicate events, I cannot say what causes th

Is refresh token always returned, for all the grant types ? It seems to be the case for authorization_code grant type but I don't think it is returned for client credentials grant. Piotr |------------

Hi, I would like to add a new resource, similar to linux-container. What is a correct way to register that resource ? The resource files are located in cf-abacus/lib/config/resource/src/resources, how

Hi Sebastien, thanks, that worked well for several resources though the planned API will make it simpler and more dynamic. Piotr From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino(a)gmail.com> To: "Discussions a

Hi, what kind of authorization is required to submit usage to Abacus ? Is the oauth token used for submission [1] required to have particular scope, specific to resource or resource provider ? Is ther

Hi Sebastien, What kind of customization of the above do you plan to expose? In some cases it may not be possible or viable to create new scope for each resource id e.g. short lived resources. The abi

Sebastien token inside our *asynchronous* usage *processing* pipeline. Shouldn't we require the individual processing steps to obtain their own tokens instead? It seems natural that the Abacus should

Hi Sebastien, each resource id e.g. short lived resources. have in mind? For example experimental service version (beta) replaced by release version, usage of which may be reported and metered but not

Hi Sebastien, I am not sure why allowing resource provider to explicitly specify scope with which particular resource usage will be submitted is a problem. Just allowing to pick a name would not compr

Hi Nick, If the STARTED event would guarantee to always include buildpack name and guid, then BUILDPACK_SET seems redundant and could be omitted. If the droplet change in running application is possib