Perhaps worthy of a major version bump? wrote:

I know versioning is somewhat a lost cause for bosh-lite. I guess my actual question is: will old manifests still work for new bosh-lite? I assume so as you said "you will not notice any difference" w

I am glad for future simpler networking for bosh-lite manifests; I just know we have lots of infrastructure-warden.yml spiff templates in lots of bosh releases. Also, will bosh-lite stemcells keep *wa

I was experimenting with private service brokers today using v225 (via PivotalWS) and was successfully able to register a service broker via the API/cf curl, but cannot figure out how to enable access

Ok, discovered that private brokers automatically show up in marketplace and "just work"; no need for "cf enable-service-access" /closed :) wrote:

I'm trying out the new "cf ssh"/Diego with a new Rails app. I'm unsure how to make the rails app's install scripts run; and the container seems to have an old/wrong Ruby in its environment. For exampl

Eventually I figured out a (nasty) workaround to manually load the environment: https://blog.starkandwayne.com/2016/02/07/run-one-off-tasks-and-database-migrations/ You need to run the following comma

Somehow I didn't get Eric's reply so my reply above probably seems odd. Sorry Eric! wrote:

Since we started the CAB calls in late 2013 the size of Cloud Foundry community, the number of engineering teams, and the number of code bases (both core & community) has grown. There was a time when

Nice work everyone!

Nice demo gif on the readme. Looks v handy!

Is a goal of this work to run pure data services like PostgreSQL or Redis inside "application instances"?

Hurray I'll be in a useful timezone and can join! "Living in Australia" and "CAB calls" are mutually exclusive :) Nic

Great work finishing the end to end integration with the CLI etc!!

Layne, if you want to start with cloudfoundry-community then you can ask any existing member/owner to add you, or me if you don't know anyone else from the 160+ list. Send me/them your github ID. If y

Follow on - a discussion/reference of this thread/proposal turned up in https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli/issues/418 (New issue In manifest, 'no-hostname' clobbers 'host' or 'hosts') Nic

I think it's a great idea to help make SBs stateless if possible. I've even toyed with modifying service instance tags as the only place in CF API where arbitrary data can be stored (base64 encode the

A fine and worthy shameless plug. Well played!

I am sorry if I've misread or am missing some previous context - who/what is the target audience for the proposal? Is this something for apps running on CF - a service discovery experience that is exp

Ok, so this proposal is a counter proposal to using BOSH links?