|
Re: revrse proxy in CF
Felix Friedrich
Hello,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
the document "Context Path Routing" [1] does not seem to be public accessible. Felix [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H_adSiY7wGR85av9YfxxPRylSO8Q8U0ANJJTg6wpYRQ/edit
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015, at 05:22 AM, Sumanth Yamala wrote:
Thanks Chris. Will keep you posted on how it goes.
|
|
|
|
Re: Can't login into api
James Bayer
what are these values?
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/blob/master/jobs/cloud_controller_ng/spec#L63-L66 On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Gwenn Etourneau <getourneau(a)pivotal.io> wrote: It seems the routers and Haproxy works as you get the 404 from the routers -- Thank you, James Bayer
|
|
|
|
Re: Diego log grouping
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
Hi, Mike,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks for the report! From your packet captures or on-VM logs, do you have an example of the log line groups that Splunk is failing to ingest? Is it all the log lines, or just ones coming from particular Diego components? The github.com/tedsuo/ifrit dependency hasn't changed in diego-release between 1099 and 1304, but it's possible that our use of it in diego-release has. Likewise, the github.com/pivotal-golang/lager package that's emitting logs has changed in only trivial ways between those releases. We have upgraded the release to use Go 1.4.2 instead of 1.4, though. Also, what stemcell versions are you using in the deployments? I'm assuming that if CF is deployed alongside these Diego deployments, it's at the corresponding recommended final version (v207 and v212, respectively). If so, are there any problems with the syslog messages coming from those deployments? Thanks, Eric, CF Runtime Diego PM
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Mike Jacobi <jacobi(a)adobe.com> wrote:
We have a Diego 1099 deployment and syslog_daemon_config configured. We
|
|
|
|
Re: [ANN] Buildpack releases: ruby, php, python, nodejs, staticfile
James Bayer
great work buildpacks team! it's great to have the binaries built by the CF
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
build process.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Mike Dalessio <mdalessio(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
Hello CF community, --
Thank you, James Bayer
|
|
|
|
Re: Can't login into api
Gwenn Etourneau
It seems the routers and Haproxy works as you get the 404 from the routers "404
Not Found: Requested route ('api.subdomain.domain') does not exist." Maybe something wrong in the manifest especially around system or apps domain On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Schwerdtfeger, Christian < christian.schwerdtfeger(a)n4group.de> wrote: Hello together,
|
|
|
|
Re: Merge Request for
Gwenn Etourneau
I merge it.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
This repos since unmaintained since some month.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Jeff Sloyer <jsloyer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
|
|
|
|
Re: Send a message to all application instances
Gwenn Etourneau
It depends, but what James suggest is to use an external service for
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
PUB/SUB. All your application listen on it and they will get notifify.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Peter Dotchev <dotchev(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi James,
|
|
|
|
Diego log grouping
MJ
We have a Diego 1099 deployment and syslog_daemon_config configured. We see a 1:1 mapping for Diego platform messages to syslog messages. In other words, for each syslog message that hits the wire, there is one platform message as its payload. This works well with Splunk, which is ultimately where the messages end up.
We have another deployment, but on Diego 1304, with its syslog_daemon_config identical to the other, but Splunk is *not* ingesting its logs. We ran a packet capture and discovered that this deployment is grouping its log messages in a 1:n manner: For each syslog message on the wire, we have multiple platform messages within, separated by newlines. I suspect this is the reason the logs aren't being ingested. I took a quick glance at the code and it seems like this might be due to ifrit/grouper, but I can't say for sure. Has anyone run into this issue? Thanks, Mike
|
|
|
|
Re: 3 etcd nodes don't work well in single zone
Tony
Hi Amit,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, we still get stuck here. And let's me introduce George who is checking this issue in detail. He will send log and report with more details to you soon. BTW, We know how to get logs from bosh vms. Thank you very much. Regards, Tony -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-3-etcd-nodes-don-t-work-well-in-single-zone-tp746p788.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
|
|
[ANN] Buildpack releases: ruby, php, python, nodejs, staticfile
Mike Dalessio
Hello CF community,
I'd like to announce update releases of the ruby, php, python, nodejs and staticfile buildpacks. *CF Binaries* Primarily these releases were made to ship CF-specific binaries, as discussed earlier on this mailing list, hence the minor version bump for ruby, python, and nodejs. The PHP buildpack also rolls in a restructuring of the manifest file, meaning that instead of enumerating hundreds of PHP and HTTPD modules, the module files are included in the "parent" tarball. As a result, previous manifests are unlikely to work, and you'll notice that we've removed the manifest-including-unsupported.yml file from the repository, and bumped the major version to indicate a backwards-incompatible change. *Security* You'll also note a CVE related to the Rubygems client packaged by JRuby was addressed in the ruby buildpack with the update of JRuby from 1.7.19 to 1.7.21. ------------------------------ Rubyv1.6.0 - 2015-07-20 https://github.com/cloudfoundry/ruby-buildpack/releases/tag/v1.6.0 - Include CF built binaries ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/97136960) Packaged binaries: | name | version | cf_stacks | |----------------------------|------------------------------|------------| | ruby | 2.0.0 | cflinuxfs2 | | ruby | 2.1.5 | cflinuxfs2 | | ruby | 2.1.6 | cflinuxfs2 | | ruby | 2.2.1 | cflinuxfs2 | | ruby | 2.2.2 | cflinuxfs2 | | jruby | ruby-1.9.3-jruby-1.7.21 | cflinuxfs2 | | jruby | ruby-2.0.0-jruby-1.7.21 | cflinuxfs2 | | jruby | ruby-2.2.2-jruby-9.0.0.0.rc2 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.12.7 | cflinuxfs2 | | bundler | 1.9.7 | cflinuxfs2 | | libyaml | 0.1.6 | cflinuxfs2 | | openjdk1.8-latest | - | cflinuxfs2 | | rails3_serve_static_assets | - | cflinuxfs2 | | rails_log_stdout | - | cflinuxfs2 | v1.5.2 - 2015-07-13 https://github.com/cloudfoundry/ruby-buildpack/releases/tag/v1.5.2 - Update 1.7.* jrubies to 1.7.21 in response to CVE-2015-4020 Add support for JRuby 9.0.0.0.rc2 Remove support for JRuby 9.0.0.0.rc1 ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98856174) - Add support for node version 0.12.7 ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98855140) Packaged binaries: | name | version | cf_stacks | |----------------------------|------------------------------|------------| | ruby | 2.0.0 | cflinuxfs2 | | ruby | 2.1.5 | cflinuxfs2 | | ruby | 2.1.6 | cflinuxfs2 | | ruby | 2.2.1 | cflinuxfs2 | | ruby | 2.2.2 | cflinuxfs2 | | jruby | ruby-1.9.3-jruby-1.7.21 | cflinuxfs2 | | jruby | ruby-2.0.0-jruby-1.7.21 | cflinuxfs2 | | jruby | ruby-2.2.2-jruby-9.0.0.0.rc2 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.12.7 | cflinuxfs2 | | bundler | 1.9.7 | cflinuxfs2 | | libyaml | 0.1.6 | cflinuxfs2 | | openjdk1.8-latest | - | cflinuxfs2 | | rails3_serve_static_assets | - | cflinuxfs2 | | rails_log_stdout | - | cflinuxfs2 | PHPv4.0.0 - 2015-07-20 https://github.com/cloudfoundry/php-buildpack/releases/tag/v4.0.0 - upgrade PHP 5.6.11, 5.5.27, and 5.4.43 ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98855368) - Package all PHP modules in a single tarball Instead of downloading PHP modules individually, include all modules in a single tarball to make the manifest more manageable. ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/95473520) - Package all httpd modules in a single tarball Instead of downloading httpd modules individually, include all modules in a single tarball to make the manifest more manageable. ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/95473520) - Add nginx 1.9.2, upgrade to 1.6.3; drop 1.7.x ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98855608) - Include current stack in unsupported stack message ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98579464) Packaged binaries: | name | version | cf_stacks | |----------|---------------|------------| | php | 5.4.42 | cflinuxfs2 | | php | 5.4.43 | cflinuxfs2 | | php | 5.5.26 | cflinuxfs2 | | php | 5.5.27 | cflinuxfs2 | | php | 5.6.10 | cflinuxfs2 | | php | 5.6.11 | cflinuxfs2 | | hhvm | 3.5.0 | cflinuxfs2 | | hhvm | 3.5.1 | cflinuxfs2 | | hhvm | 3.6.0 | cflinuxfs2 | | hhvm | 3.6.1 | cflinuxfs2 | | composer | 1.0.0-alpha10 | cflinuxfs2 | | httpd | 2.4.12 | cflinuxfs2 | | newrelic | 4.20.2.95 | cflinuxfs2 | | nginx | 1.6.3 | cflinuxfs2 | | nginx | 1.8.0 | cflinuxfs2 | | nginx | 1.9.2 | cflinuxfs2 | Pythonv1.5.0 - 2015-07-20 https://github.com/cloudfoundry/python-buildpack/releases/tag/v1.5.0 - Include CF built binaries ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/97136960) - Include current stack in unsupported stack message ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98579464) - Update pip to 7.1.0 - Update setuptools to 18.0.1 - Set xtrace if $BUILDPACK_XTRACE set Packaged binaries: | name | version | cf_stacks | |-------------|---------|------------| | python | 2.7.10 | cflinuxfs2 | | python | 2.7.9 | cflinuxfs2 | | python | 3.3.5 | cflinuxfs2 | | python | 3.3.6 | cflinuxfs2 | | python | 3.4.2 | cflinuxfs2 | | python | 3.4.3 | cflinuxfs2 | | libffi | 3.1 | cflinuxfs2 | | libmemcache | 1.0.18 | cflinuxfs2 | NodeJSv1.5.0 - 2015-07-20 https://github.com/cloudfoundry/nodejs-buildpack/releases/tag/v1.5.0 - remove versions 0.8.x and 0.9.x from manifest ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/97770112) - Include CF built binaries ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/97136960) Packaged binaries: | name | version | cf_stacks | |------|---------|------------| | node | 0.10.38 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.10.40 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.11.15 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.11.16 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.12.6 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.12.7 | cflinuxfs2 | v1.4.2 -- 2015-07-13 https://github.com/cloudfoundry/nodejs-buildpack/releases/tag/v1.4.2 - Security upgrade to nodejs 0.12.7 Add support for node version 0.10.40 Remove support for node version 0.10.37 ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98855140) Packaged binaries: | name | version | cf_stacks | |------|---------|------------| | node | 0.10.38 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.10.40 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.11.15 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.11.16 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.12.4 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.12.6 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.12.7 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.8.27 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.8.28 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.9.11 | cflinuxfs2 | | node | 0.9.12 | cflinuxfs2 | StaticFilev1.2.1 - 2015-07-17 https://github.com/cloudfoundry/staticfile-buildpack/releases/tag/v1.2.1 - Adding helpful message for unsupported stack ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98579464) - Compress nginx response body for more MIME types ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98128132) - Update nginx to version 1.8.0 ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/97663450) Packaged binaries: | name | version | cf_stacks | |-------|---------|------------| | nginx | 1.8.0 | cflinuxfs2 | .
|
|
|
|
Re: 3 etcd nodes don't work well in single zone
Amit Kumar Gupta
Hi Tony,
Are you still having this issue? Having 3 etcd nodes in a single zone should work perfectly fine. Can you include logs from your HM9k nodes and your etcd nodes covering a few minutes where the messed up instance reporting issue is happening. Please let me know if you need guidance in getting logs of a BOSH VM. Amit ----- Amit, CF OSS Release Integration PM Pivotal Software, Inc. -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-3-etcd-nodes-don-t-work-well-in-single-zone-tp746p786.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
|
|
Re: Send a message to all application instances
Peter Dotchev <dotchev@...>
Hi James,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
But how does this service deliver the messages to all app instances? is it via HTTP? Best regards, Peter D
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:11 AM, James Bayer <jbayer(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
a common way is to use a pub/sub pattern with a cf service the app binds
|
|
|
|
UAA Release 2.4.1 Now Available !
Sree Tummidi
*Features*
- Update the Identity Provider End Point to save and retrieve Lockout policy per zone <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/87445084> - Show relevant message after user lockout <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98994270> - Updated SAML identity provider configuration to accept an addShadowUser property to govern shadow account creating during SAML Authentication <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/97780020> - Expose Managing /Users & /Groups to a Zone Admin <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98490322> - New Scope for Creating Clients in a Zone <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98491608> - Allow to build uaa with Java 8 <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98609740> *Bug Fixes* - UAADB Housekeeping: Clean up unused/expired oauth_codes and one time passcodes <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98149612> - Querying users with pagination will return duplicate users <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/96657510> - Serialization/deserialization issues of Java Objects stored in UAADB <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/98148936> — View it on GitHub <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/uaa/releases/tag/2.4.1>. Thanks, Sree Tummidi Sr. Product Manager Identity - Pivotal Cloud Foundry
|
|
|
|
Merge Request for
Jeff Sloyer
Hello,
I have submitted a PR ( https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-meteor-buildpack/pull/3) for the Meteor buildpack, what is the process for it getting reviewed and merged?
|
|
|
|
Can't login into api
Schwerdtfeger, Christian <christian.schwerdtfeger@...>
Hello together,
i've deployed Cloudfoundry into AWS like following: - bosh aws create like descriped here: http://docs.cloudfoundry.org/deploying/ec2/bootstrap-aws-vpc.html - Installation of bosh like descriped on this page: http://bosh.io/docs/deploy-microbosh-to-aws.html - installed cloudfoundry using cf-boshworkspace ( https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-boshworkspace) My deployment uses the cf-tiny-scalable.yml deployment of cf-boshworkspace and is starting secondary AZ nodes for backbone, api and runner. With some minor modifications i've got the installation to run through without error. After that i tried to "curl api.subdomain.domain/info" and get "404 Not Found: Requested route ('api.subdomain.domain') does not exist." Does someone of you have a glue where to search the error? The output of "monit status" on nodes "public_haproxy_z1/0" and "api_z1/0" seems to be okay. All processes are marked as "running" and "monitored". Thank you Christian
|
|
|
|
Re: Send a message to all application instances
James Bayer
a common way is to use a pub/sub pattern with a cf service the app binds
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
to. the service could be something like rabbitmq or redis that supports the pub/sub pattern.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Peter Dotchev <dotchev(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, --
Thank you, James Bayer
|
|
|
|
Send a message to all application instances
Peter Dotchev <dotchev@...>
Hello,
I could not find a way to send/broadcast a message to all instances of a given application in Cloud Foundry. How can I notify all app instances of certain events? If I just send a HTTP request, CF router will dispatch it to a single instance of the app. What solutions do you use in such cases. Best regards, Peter D.
|
|
|
|
Re: Did anybody deploy a wiki as app to CF?
sabith ks
There are couple of them listed in the php buildpack @
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/php-buildpack#examples
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:29 PM James Bayer <jbayer(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
i started a list of 3rd party compatible apps [1] for cloud foundry. if --
Thanks Sabith 408.896.6261 Mail send from portable device, excuse for any typos
|
|
|
|
Re: Did anybody deploy a wiki as app to CF?
James Bayer
i started a list of 3rd party compatible apps [1] for cloud foundry. if you
know of apps that work, please add it on the wiki, especially if there are setup steps. https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-docs-contrib/wiki/3rd-Party-Compatible-Apps On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:13 PM, john mcteague <john.mcteague(a)gmail.com> wrote: We've successfully deployed Drupal (7.3x), we used the blog article as a -- Thank you, James Bayer
|
|
|
|
Re: [buildpacks] CF-built binaries: release timeline and beta testing
James Bayer
mike d is the best to answer, but i'll take a crack at it
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Shawn Nielsen <sknielse(a)gmail.com> wrote: Two questions on these cf-built binaries:for some buildpacks, we have been relying on heroku binaries which is an external dependency. we want the cf team to be in complete control of how and when the binaries are built. this ensures cf can be in control of our own destiny when for patching security issues or bugs. additionally it means cf can take responsibility for how the binaries are compiled to increase trust of the binary contents. most/all cf buildpacks are available in online and offline mode as i understand it. see: https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/buildpack-packager/blob/master/doc/disconnected_environments.md
-- Thank you, James Bayer
|
|
|