CF Application Runtime PMC: Diego Project Lead Call for Nominations
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
Hi, everyone, I am stepping down as the lead for the Diego project within the Application Runtime PMC, although I will remain in my role as the lead for the PMC itself. The Diego team, located primarily in San Francisco with remote members in New York and Virginia, now has an opening for its project lead. Project leads must be nominated by a Cloud Foundry Foundation member. Please send nominations directly to me or in reply to this message no later than 11:59 PM PDT on Monday, June 24, 2019. Also, if you have any questions about the role or the nomination process, as described in the CFF governance documents (https://www.cloudfoundry.org/governance/cff_development_operations_policy/), please let me know. Thanks, Eric Malm, CF Application Runtime PMC Lead
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
REMINDER: CAB call for June is next week Wednesday 19th @ 8a Pacific
Michael Maximilien
Hi, all,
Reminder that the CAB call for June is next Wednesday 19th @ 8a Pacific.
We will have regular highlights, QAs, as well as one planned talk with another TBD:
1. External DNS connector for Cloud Foundry [1] by Sergey Matochkin and Comcast engineering team
2. TBD (contact me if you have a talk to share)
All other info in agenda [0]. Zoom soon. Best,
------ dr.max ibm ☁ silicon valley, ca maximilien.org
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Re: CFCR public backlog
Mike Lloyd <mike@...>
Elisabeth,
I would like to second Guillaume’s statement; if it’s too difficult to use the native Github constructs for greater discoverability, then Pivotal Tracker is fine.
Thanks,
Mike.
From: cf-dev@... <cf-dev@...>
On Behalf Of Guillaume Berche via Lists.Cloudfoundry.Org
Hi Elisabeth,
Thanks for your prompt reply and action to improve things!
Regarding github vs pivotal tracker preference:
I believe that what matters most is that the content that the CRCF team produces be shared with the rest of the community as to enable best collaboration. With other CFF teams, this typically includes epics, stories with their associated design discussions/docs, milestones, weekly planned and completed work (usually with associated story points), story life cycle through its status (delivered, accepted, rejected, ...)
If there is a way the CFCR team can share this content on github that would be easier for the community: github content is more discoverable through web search, can be crossed referenced from other github projects, and accepts community
inputs. See related email thread [1] regarding an experiment my team conducted a few years back to automatically mirror pivotal tracker content onto github.
Thanks again,
[1] https://lists.cloudfoundry.org/g/cf-dev/message/5663?p=,,,20,0,0,0::Created,,mirror,20,2,20,6333592
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 3:54 AM Elisabeth Hendrickson <ehendrickson@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Re: CFCR public backlog
Hi Elisabeth, Thanks for your prompt reply and action to improve things! Regarding github vs pivotal tracker preference: I believe that what matters most is that the content that the CRCF team produces be shared with the rest of the community as to enable best collaboration. With other CFF teams, this typically includes epics, stories with their associated design discussions/docs, milestones, weekly planned and completed work (usually with associated story points), story life cycle through its status (delivered, accepted, rejected, ...) If there is a way the CFCR team can share this content on github that would be easier for the community: github content is more discoverable through web search, can be crossed referenced from other github projects, and accepts community inputs. See related email thread
[1] regarding an experiment my team conducted a few years back to automatically mirror pivotal tracker content onto github. If instead CRCR team only manages to share a smaller fraction of its content onto github and the rest remains unavailable to the community, then I believe a single public pivotal tracker would be more beneficial to the community. Thanks again, Guillaume. [1] https://lists.cloudfoundry.org/g/cf-dev/message/5663?p=,,,20,0,0,0::Created,,mirror,20,2,20,6333592
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 3:54 AM Elisabeth Hendrickson <ehendrickson@...> wrote: Hi Guillaume,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Asynchronous Service Broker Bindings is now GA
Aarti Kriplani
Hello CF Devs, We are happy to announce that Asynchronous Service Broker Bindings feature is now Generally Available starting from CC API Version: 2.137.0 (CAPI Release 1.82.0). It allows service brokers to support long running binding operations, such as provisioning user accounts, setting up firewalls and etc. without the need to change the default CF timeout as requested in this issue. Corresponding changes to leverage this feature have also been part from CF CLI v6.40.1. We would like to thank for your feedback during the experimental phase. Thanks, Services API Team
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Re: CFCR public backlog
Elisabeth Hendrickson
Hi Guillaume,
Thank you so much for raising this issue. You're right - the public backlog is not being kept up to date right now and we need to fix that. We are working to bring the details of the work to a more public place so it is more easily visible. We are hoping to have that finished by the end of next week. We're currently debating whether to use github issues or Pivotal Tracker. I'm curious if you have a preference? Many thanks for raising this concern, Elisabeth
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
CFCR public backlog
ps: I don't have direct email to CFCR lead and PM Colin Humphreys and Brendan Nolan. I hope that someone can forward them this email if they're not subscribed to this list.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Important Notice: [nodejs-buildpack] End of support for nodejs versions 11.x after 2019-06-05
Elliott Shanks
The first release of the Node.js buildpack after June 05, 2019 will no longer include any versions of Node.js 11.x. These Node.js versions are no longer supported upstream [1]. Please migrate your Node.js apps to supported versions of Node.js before that time. Note: Unless you are manually specifying a version of Node.js for the buildpack to use, or you have customized your Node.js buildpack, no action is required. [1] https://github.com/nodejs/Release Thanks, Elliott Shanks, CF Buildpacks PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
CF CLI v6.45.0 is released
Will Murphy
Hello everyone, The CF CLI team has just released version v6.45.0. Please see https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli/releases/tag/v6.45.0 for release notes. Thanks! The CF CLI Team
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Important Notice: [Stack-Auditor] Issue with Stack Auditor change-stack command in version 0.0.3
Elliott Shanks
We have identified an issue with Stack Auditor version 0.0.3 and the change-stack command. In some cases, the wrong application will attempt to change stacks if another application with the same name exists in a different space. A fix has been included in the latest release of Stack Auditor (0.0.4). It is recommended that all users of Stack Auditor no longer use version 0.0.3 and migrate to a later version of Stack Auditor. For more information, see https://github.com/cloudfoundry/stack-auditor/releases Respectfully, Product Manager, Buildpacks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Contribute to the Cloud Foundry YouTube Channel
Brie Rogers
Hello All, Several of you have expressed interest in creating instructional “how-to” videos for the broader Cloud Foundry community. If you are interested in making video content to be published on the Cloud Foundry Foundation YouTube channel for end users, contributors, developers, operators, and others, please read the publishing guide. Guidelines for production include:
Please reach out to me if you’re interested in contributing video content to the Cloud Foundry Foundation YouTube channel. We’re looking forward to growing this program. Thank you! Brie Rogers
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
CFCD v2 Tester Signup
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
charanavengers@...
Hi all,
I want to create users in the cloudfoundary uaa for my web application.I am using the authorization code grant for that instead of redirecting to the client redirected url it is redirecting to the uaa login url.Is there any help Thank You,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Announcement: Planned Deprecation of the v6 cf CLI
Abby Chau
Hello everyone, Hope this finds you well. Following on the CC V2 API Deprecation Plan notification recently, the cf CLI team are writing to also announce the planned deprecation of the v6 cf CLI. Please provide feedback and review the v6 CF CLI Deprecation Plan for details on strategy and timeframes. We hope to make the upgrade process as seamless as possible for our users, and that the v7 cf CLI will provide greater opportunities to grow and enhance the product for our users. As always, we value your feedback and would appreciate comments in the document. We also hang out on Cloud Foundry Slack at #cli. We hope to hear from you. Many thanks, Abby Chau and the CF CLI team
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Foundry Summit CFP Deadline is Friday
Just wanted to remind you all about the CFP deadline that is creeping up. Please go ahead and get your submissions in before this Friday. -- Swarna Podila (she/her) Senior Director, Community | Cloud Foundry FoundationYou can read more about pronouns here, or please ask if you'd like to find out more. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Deborah Giles <dgiles@...> Date: Wed, May 29, 2019 at 8:34 AM Subject: Cloud Foundry Summit CFP Deadline is Friday To: <spodila@...>
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Camilo Aguilar
If you don’t have a SAML provider already in place, I would rather use Keycloak. The SAML provider we used was our customer’s Active Directory Federated Services. We used UAA to not have to integrate our apps with SAML and Kerberos, which was our customer’s authentication and authorization solution.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:55 AM Enrique Cano <enrique.canocarballar@...> wrote: Thanks, Camilo, that's very interesting and helpful. So, it's possible to do it, we just need to have a SAML provider integrated with Kerberos, and then we can integrate UAA with that SAML provider, is that correct? What SAML provider did you use? --
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Enrique Cano
Thanks, Camilo, that's very interesting and helpful. So, it's possible to do it, we just need to have a SAML provider integrated with Kerberos, and then we can integrate UAA with that SAML provider, is that correct? What SAML provider did you use?
Many thanks Enrique
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Eirini office hours
Hi cf-dev,
Project Eirini got lots of attention during the last Cloud Foundry Summit. We decided to run open office hours, so people can ask any questions about Eirini and current progress. It will happen every first Monday of the month at 3-30 PM Irish time (also known as GMT) starting next week. Check this link to convert it to your time http://www.timebie.com/std/irish.php?q=15.5 We will use the following Zoom room https://zoom.us/j/8743349130 Feel free to join! Thank you, Oleksandr & Eirini team
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
[Proposal] CF-RFC 020: BOSH: setting global kernel parameters by jobs
Stanislav German-Evtushenko
Hi, everyone,
Somebody who has already tried to ensure kernel parameters to be in a certain state for a particular bosh job must have noticed that there is no simple and reliable way to do this (see https://github.com/cloudfoundry/routing-release/issues/138 as an example). I would like to share a proposal with the aim to solve it.
Link to the proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BEi2A5T47K8f26B-QSotuYr-16tUCNRbX6BumNKXb7c Pull request: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/os-conf-release/pull/47 Slack channel:
https://cloudfoundry.slack.com/messages/CJZLX6NDT
Please let us know your opinions here, on the document or on the slack channel.
Thanks, Stanislav
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Config Server Roadmap
Hi Mike, You might be interested in zipcar's hashicorp vault bosh config server api impl:
Le mer. 22 mai 2019 18:09, Mike Lloyd <mike@...> a écrit :
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|