Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Parthiban Annadurai <senjiparthi@...>
Hey Warren,
Thanks for your valuable suggestions. I have SSHed into that VM. Monit Summary Command shows the following, root(a)5c446a3d-3070-4d24-9f2e-1cff18218c07:/var/vcap/sys/log# monit summary The Monit daemon 5.2.4 uptime: 20m Process 'cloud_controller_ng' initializing Process 'cloud_controller_worker_local_1' not monitored Process 'cloud_controller_worker_local_2' not monitored Process 'nginx_cc' initializing Process 'metron_agent' running File 'nfs_mounter' Does not exist System 'system_5c446a3d-3070-4d24-9f2e-1cff18218c07' running Also I have checked for cloud_controller_ng_ctl.log, it has the following, [2015-11-18 04:33:34+0000] ------------ STARTING cloud_controller_ng_ctl at Wed Nov 18 04:32:53 UTC 2015 -------------- [2015-11-18 04:33:34+0000] Preparing local package directory [2015-11-18 04:33:34+0000] Preparing local resource_pool directory [2015-11-18 04:33:34+0000] Preparing local droplet directory [2015-11-18 04:33:34+0000] Deprecated: Use -s or --insert-seed flag [2015-11-18 04:33:34+0000] Killing /var/vcap/sys/run/cloud_controller_ng/cloud_controller_ng.pid: 32522 [2015-11-18 04:33:34+0000] .Stopped Then, nfs_mounter_ctl.log has the following, [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] Found NFS mount, unmounting... [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] NFS unmounted [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] idmapd start/post-stop, process 25777 [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] NFS unmounted [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] Mounting NFS... [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] mount.nfs: timeout set for Wed Nov 18 04:29:20 2015 [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'timeo=10,intr,lookupcache=positive,vers=4,addr=192.168.33.53,clientaddr=192.168.33.184' [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'timeo=10,intr,lookupcache=positive,addr=192.168.33.53' [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6 [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=3, prot=17 [2015-11-18 04:27:20+0000] Failed to start: cannot write to NFS I think the problem is with the NFS. Could you please help on this issue?? Thanks.. Regards Parthiban A On 18 November 2015 at 08:42, Warren Fernandes <wfernandes(a)pivotal.io> wrote: Try ssh'ing onto the box to see what the logs say.
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Warren Fernandes
Try ssh'ing onto the box to see what the logs say.
`bosh ssh api_z1 0` Then, `cd /var/vcap/sys/log/` There are plenty of logs to look through, I'd start by running `monit summary` (make sure to be root) to see if any process is failing. If there is a process failing then look at its respective logs. Else start with cloud_controller_ng log directory.
|
|
Re: regarding using public key to verify client
Noburou TANIGUCHI
Hi ankit,
Can you explain it a little bit or refer any document. That would beWould you please narrow the focus of your question? What do you want to know about? Thanks. ankit wrote Hi ml-node+s70369n2732h13(a).nabble ] ankit.ankit@ > ----- I'm not a ... noburou taniguchi -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2741.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
Re: cloud_controller_ng performance degrades slowly over time
Amit Kumar Gupta
Heya Matt,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I keep thinking about this puzzle every couple days to see if I can get any more insight. It would be great to understand the root cause; in the mean time we are going to try and setup Consul to recurse to other nameservers (instead of just letting the system fall to the next namserver in /etc/resolv.conf), and hopefully that'll make some of the weird Consul behaviour we've seen in different environments better. But back to this one, what I'm seeing is that there's a bunch of fast iterations, then one weird one where it takes a few seconds, and then all subsequent iterations are slow and hit the 5s timeout. In the fast iteration, we see a sendmmsg sending multiple (2) messages, followed by 2 poll/ioctl/recvfroms. Each fast iteration does this first for 127.0.0.1, then 8.8.8.8. The first bad iteration, that takes about 3s, does the sendmmsg, and the 2 poll/ioctl/recvfroms for 127.0.0.1 just fine. Then after doing the sendmmsg to 8.8.8.8, it gets a recv's a response for one of the messages, but *times out (3s) polling for a response to the other message*. It then appears to retry talking to 8.8.8.8, this time, and *all subsequent calls, using sendto instead of sendmmsg* to send one message at a time: sendto/poll/ioctl/recvfrom, sendto/poll/ioctl/recvfrom. All subsequent iterations only use sendto. And now it's the first *sendto to 127.0.0.1 that times out (5s)*. It immediately goes on to 8.8.8.8 after that first sendto to 127.0.0.1 fails. Some questions are: (1) why doesn't the response to one of the sendmmsg messages arrive? (2) why do all system calls switch from sendmmsg to sendto after that first failure? (3) why do requests to 127.0.0.1 in the form of separate sendto calls timeout on the first sendto call, whereas when sent simultaneously as two messages in sendmmsg, it seems to work fine? I put these findings together and asked on serverfault.com: http://serverfault.com/questions/736041/dns-lookups-eventually-become-consistently-slow-in-long-lived-ruby-process. One suggestion I saw, which could shed a bit more light is to *call strace with the additional -r -T* flags to get relative time between syscalls, and the time spent within each syscall. Care to give that a try when you have some time? Cheers, Amit
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Matt Cholick <cholick(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Gotcha. Yeah, the rescue lets that test run; after 425k lookups, it never
|
|
Re: UAA Admin interface to register user/client?
Sree Tummidi
UAA Provides an Admin Tool UAAC (written in ruby) to manage Users, Clients
and Groups. You can find more information here: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-uaac Thanks, Sree Tummidi Sr. Product Manager Identity - Pivotal Cloud Foundry On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Juan Antonio Breña Moral < bren(a)juanantonio.info> wrote: Good morning,
|
|
Re: Documentation on creating and deploying windows applications diego-windows-release
James Bayer
this blog [1] shows an example windows app push:
cf push APPNAME -s windows2012R2 -b binary_buildpack in this example, you'd want to take an app like this example [2] that has been "published" from visual studio and push from that publish directory (or specify it with -p). web socket apps should work well provided your load balancer configuration supports web socket. [1] https://blog.pivotal.io/pivotal-cloud-foundry/products/pivotal-cloud-foundry-1-6-technical-blog-new-runtime-services-net-more [2] https://github.com/jbayer/windows-cf-demo On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Vinay Vaidya <vvaidya(a)rediffmail.com> wrote: Deployed Diego components for Cloud Foundry per -- Thank you, James Bayer
|
|
Documentation on creating and deploying windows applications diego-windows-release
Vinay Vaidya
Deployed Diego components for Cloud Foundry per https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/diego-windows-release
How do I create and deploy windows apps on Diego? Specifically, is it possible to deploy a native windows application that has multiple fiies and directories besides the main executable? What about a .NET application that is a client using a websocket connection to the server? Thanks.
|
|
Re: Deploying a shell script driven java application to cf
Ben Hale <bhale@...>
Dammina,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Unfortunately, Daniel’s suggestion won’t work. The buildpack expects the filesystem to look like an exploded JAR/WAR and will refuse to stage if it does not. Instead of trying to get your shell script to run inside of the container, you should actually be trying to run your application without a shell script. What exactly does your shell script do? I think you’ll find that the buildpack already does the same things removing the need for it. -Ben Hale Cloud Foundry Java Experience, Lead
On Nov 16, 2015, at 04:39, Daniel Mikusa <dmikusa(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
|
|
Re: CF-RELEASE v202 UPLOAD ERROR
Parthiban Annadurai <senjiparthi@...>
Hello All,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
As per the suggestions provided, am able to move forward with my Cloud Foundry Deployments. Now, am getting the following error, *Error 400007: `api_z1/0' is not running after update* I searched for this error but no solution yet. Could anyone on this issue?? Thanks.. Regards Parthiban A
On 27 October 2015 at 00:18, Amit Gupta <agupta(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
Looks like most of your VMs are fine, but one of your etcd VM's agent is
|
|
Re: regarding using public key to verify client
ankit <ankit.ankit@...>
Hi
Can you explain it a little bit or refer any document. That would be helpful. Thanks Ankit From: Noburou TANIGUCHI [via CF Dev] [mailto:ml-node+s70369n2732h13(a)n6.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 12:59 PM To: ., Ankit <ankit.ankit(a)philips.com> Subject: RE: regarding using public key to verify client Hello ankit, But I just want to know that is there any way where I can put my key files to java build pack with which I am deploying my application on cloud foundry and let my application use those keys from build pack to verify the signature. Because I don’t want to add those key files to my app’s war.Now I think I've understood what you want to do. And one more thing that I am using custom java buildpack. (This thing I forgot to mention earlier.)So I think you can add cert keys anywhere in java buildpack you think appropriate (`resources` directory, for example), and modify the buildpack to copy them in the buildpack's compile phase, such like: ```diff diff --git a/bin/compile b/bin/compile index 53e0b8d..3d198c9 100755 --- a/bin/compile +++ b/bin/compile @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ require 'java_buildpack/buildpack' build_dir = ARGV[0] +require('fileutils') +cert_keys_path = File.expand_path('../../resources/.ssh', __FILE__) +FileUtils.cp_r(cert_keys_path, build_dir, {:preserve => true}) + JavaBuildpack::Buildpack.with_buildpack(build_dir, 'Compile failed with exception %s') do |buildpack| buildpack.compile end ``` (the code above assumes that the cert keys in `resources/.ssh/` and copies them to `.ssh` under the application directory) ankit wrote Hi Taniguchi, Thank you for your response. You are right that my application is responsible for verification of the signature. But I just want to know that is there any way where I can put my key files to java build pack with which I am deploying my application on cloud foundry and let my application use those keys from build pack to verify the signature. Because I don’t want to add those key files to my app’s war. Just like we put cacerts in java buildpack which is used by application, can’t we put the key files in buildpack and use those by our application to verify signature. And one more thing that I am using custom java buildpack. (This thing I forgot to mention earlier.) Thanks Ankit From: Noburou TANIGUCHI [via CF Dev] [mailto:[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2732&i=0>] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 6:09 PM To: ., Ankit <[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2732&i=1>> Subject: Re: regarding using public key to verify client Hi ankit, First of all, do you think who is responsible to verify the signature? Your application? Or (one of) the components of Cloud Foundry? I assume the former is your answer. I think there is no functionality in Cloud Foundry to verify client signature. Then, if you use the Cloud Foundry java-buildpack to deploy your application, I think there is the only one way to send key files with your app on deployment. It is to add your key files to your app's war / jar / zip file, primitively like: ``` jar uvf your-war-jar-zip-file path-to-your-key-files-or-directories ``` But you may add a maven / gradle task to do such a thing. This is because the Cloud Foundry java-buildpack accepts only one zip-format file on a deployment. # Please correct this post if I am wrong. Thank you. ankit wrote Suppose my application is deployed on the cloud foundry and my client sends a POST request that contains some message but that message is digitally signed by client’s private key. So, I need client’s public key(digital id of client) to verify my client for inbound calls in the cloud foundry where application is running. So, can you tell me where can I put these public keys(digital IDs of clients) in java build pack or any other place. Similarly, for outbound calls I want my message to be digitally signed and for that I need private key to be used. So, where can I put that also? I'm not a ... noburou taniguchi ________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2719.html To unsubscribe from regarding using public key to verify client, click here<http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2711&code=YW5raXQuYW5raXRAcGhpbGlwcy5jb218MjcxMXw3MzcyNjkwNzY=><http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2711&code=YW5raXQuYW5raXRAcGhpbGlwcy5jb218MjcxMXw3MzcyNjkwNzY=%3e>. NAML<http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml><http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml%3e> ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. I'm not a ... noburou taniguchi ________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2732.html To unsubscribe from regarding using public key to verify client, click here<http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2711&code=YW5raXQuYW5raXRAcGhpbGlwcy5jb218MjcxMXw3MzcyNjkwNzY=>. NAML<http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2734.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
Re: UAA Admin interface to register user/client?
Juan Antonio Breña Moral <bren at juanantonio.info...>
Good morning,
In my case, I have some Scripts for UAA here: https://github.com/prosociallearnEU/cf-nodejs-client/blob/master/test/lib/model/uaa/UserUAATests.js https://github.com/prosociallearnEU/cf-nodejs-client/blob/master/test/lib/model/cloudcontroller/OrganizationsTests.js Cheers
|
|
Re: regarding using public key to verify client
Noburou TANIGUCHI
Hello ankit,
But I just want to know that is there any way where I can put my key filesNow I think I've understood what you want to do. And one more thing that I am using custom java buildpack. (This thing ISo I think you can add cert keys anywhere in java buildpack you think appropriate (`resources` directory, for example), and modify the buildpack to copy them in the buildpack's compile phase, such like: ```diff diff --git a/bin/compile b/bin/compile index 53e0b8d..3d198c9 100755 --- a/bin/compile +++ b/bin/compile @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ require 'java_buildpack/buildpack' build_dir = ARGV[0] +require('fileutils') +cert_keys_path = File.expand_path('../../resources/.ssh', __FILE__) +FileUtils.cp_r(cert_keys_path, build_dir, {:preserve => true}) + JavaBuildpack::Buildpack.with_buildpack(build_dir, 'Compile failed with exception %s') do |buildpack| buildpack.compile end ``` (the code above assumes that the cert keys in `resources/.ssh/` and copies them to `.ssh` under the application directory) ankit wrote Hi Taniguchi, ml-node+s70369n2719h10(a).nabble ] ankit.ankit@ > ----- I'm not a ... noburou taniguchi -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2732.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
Re: regarding using public key to verify client
ankit <ankit.ankit@...>
Hi Taniguchi,
Thank you for your response. You are right that my application is responsible for verification of the signature. But I just want to know that is there any way where I can put my key files to java build pack with which I am deploying my application on cloud foundry and let my application use those keys from build pack to verify the signature. Because I don’t want to add those key files to my app’s war. Just like we put cacerts in java buildpack which is used by application, can’t we put the key files in buildpack and use those by our application to verify signature. And one more thing that I am using custom java buildpack. (This thing I forgot to mention earlier.) Thanks Ankit From: Noburou TANIGUCHI [via CF Dev] [mailto:ml-node+s70369n2719h10(a)n6.nabble.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 6:09 PM To: ., Ankit <ankit.ankit(a)philips.com> Subject: Re: regarding using public key to verify client Hi ankit, First of all, do you think who is responsible to verify the signature? Your application? Or (one of) the components of Cloud Foundry? I assume the former is your answer. I think there is no functionality in Cloud Foundry to verify client signature. Then, if you use the Cloud Foundry java-buildpack to deploy your application, I think there is the only one way to send key files with your app on deployment. It is to add your key files to your app's war / jar / zip file, primitively like: ``` jar uvf your-war-jar-zip-file path-to-your-key-files-or-directories ``` But you may add a maven / gradle task to do such a thing. This is because the Cloud Foundry java-buildpack accepts only one zip-format file on a deployment. # Please correct this post if I am wrong. Thank you. ankit wrote Suppose my application is deployed on the cloud foundry and my client sends a POST request that contains some message but that message is digitally signed by client’s private key. So, I need client’s public key(digital id of client) to verify my client for inbound calls in the cloud foundry where application is running. So, can you tell me where can I put these public keys(digital IDs of clients) in java build pack or any other place. Similarly, for outbound calls I want my message to be digitally signed and for that I need private key to be used. So, where can I put that also? I'm not a ... noburou taniguchi ________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2719.html To unsubscribe from regarding using public key to verify client, click here<http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2711&code=YW5raXQuYW5raXRAcGhpbGlwcy5jb218MjcxMXw3MzcyNjkwNzY=>. NAML<http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2731.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
Re: regarding using public key to verify client
ankit <ankit.ankit@...>
Hi Taniguchi,
Thank you for your response. You are right that my application is responsible for verification of the signature. But I just want to know that is there any way where I can put my key files to java build pack with which I am deploying my application on cloud foundry and let my application use those keys from build pack to verify the signature. Because I don’t want to add those key files to my app’s war. Just like we put cacerts in java buildpack which is used by application, can’t we put the key files in buildpack and use those by our application to verify signature. Thanks Ankit From: Noburou TANIGUCHI [via CF Dev] [mailto:ml-node+s70369n2719h10(a)n6.nabble.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 6:09 PM To: ., Ankit <ankit.ankit(a)philips.com> Subject: Re: regarding using public key to verify client Hi ankit, First of all, do you think who is responsible to verify the signature? Your application? Or (one of) the components of Cloud Foundry? I assume the former is your answer. I think there is no functionality in Cloud Foundry to verify client signature. Then, if you use the Cloud Foundry java-buildpack to deploy your application, I think there is the only one way to send key files with your app on deployment. It is to add your key files to your app's war / jar / zip file, primitively like: ``` jar uvf your-war-jar-zip-file path-to-your-key-files-or-directories ``` But you may add a maven / gradle task to do such a thing. This is because the Cloud Foundry java-buildpack accepts only one zip-format file on a deployment. # Please correct this post if I am wrong. Thank you. ankit wrote Suppose my application is deployed on the cloud foundry and my client sends a POST request that contains some message but that message is digitally signed by client’s private key. So, I need client’s public key(digital id of client) to verify my client for inbound calls in the cloud foundry where application is running. So, can you tell me where can I put these public keys(digital IDs of clients) in java build pack or any other place. Similarly, for outbound calls I want my message to be digitally signed and for that I need private key to be used. So, where can I put that also? I'm not a ... noburou taniguchi ________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2719.html To unsubscribe from regarding using public key to verify client, click here<http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2711&code=YW5raXQuYW5raXRAcGhpbGlwcy5jb218MjcxMXw3MzcyNjkwNzY=>. NAML<http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/regarding-using-public-key-to-verify-client-tp2711p2730.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
UAA Admin interface to register user/client?
Feruz Abdella <feruz.abdella@...>
Hi,
I am running UAA locally. I was wondering if UAA provides an admin user interface to register users and client applications Or I have to write some kind of script? I appreciate the help in advance. Thanks! Feruz Abdella Software Developer Cell-phone: (240)-498-7284 Email: Feruz.Abdella(a)gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/feruzabdella
|
|
Re: [abacus-perf] Persisting Metrics performance
KRuelY <kevinyudhiswara@...>
Hi all,
Thanks for the suggestions. I will look at the suggestions, and think about them more. The reason of saving to database and persisting them is to see how my apps are doing at the specific time. Specifically when I'm asleep and my apps are having problems, I would like to know which requests are failing, why they're failing, and have concrete data to blame my dependencies . Joke aside, my goal is what I have said. I would like to persist the data. I believe my tasks right now are: 1. to make my apps use breaker (with breaking turned off) 2. save to database. One issue I know is that the name doesn't shows up correctly. It shows as wrapper. Right now I'll not think about it, and focus on making my apps use perf. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/abacus-perf-Persisting-Metrics-performance-tp2693p2728.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
CF CAB call for November is this Wednesday Nov. 18th, 2015 @ 8a PDT
Michael Maximilien
Hi, all,
Quick reminder that the CAB call for November is this week Wednesday November 18th @ 8a PDT. Product managers, please add project updates to Agenda here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SCOlAquyUmNM-AQnekCOXiwhLs6gveTxAcduvDcW_xI/edit#heading=h.o44xhgvum2we
Everyone, if you have something to share, please also add an entry at the end in Other section. Best, Chip, James, and Max PS: call info and details are in the link above; just visit it
|
|
Export control information of the "cached" runtimes in buildpack packages
Jack Cai
The "cached" packages of the buildpacks contain lots of runtime binaries,
like OpenJDK, Node.js, PHP etc, built by Cloud Foundry. Has anybody gone through a review of their export control classification? For example, ASF has this nice page [1] listing the classification of their products. Such information would make things easier for vendors who want to redistribute Cloud Foundry. Jack [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
|
|
Re: region qualifier for organizations
Jean-Sebastien Delfino
I just wanted to follow up on this.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Github 110 is now closed as we've finished removing explicit references to regions in the Abacus API in favor of a more generic namespace/scoping mechanism. With these changes, organization ids, resource instance ids, etc can include a namespace/scope allowing you to ensure they're really universally unique across your multiple CF deployments (if you're paranoid...) For example the following ids will be happily accepted: a3d7fe4d-3cb1-4cc3-a831-ffe98e20cf27 us-south:a3d7fe4d-3cb1-4cc3-a831-ffe98e20cf27 my-deployment:foo:bar:xyz23:a3d7fe4d-3cb1-4cc3-a831-ffe98e20cf27 ... We're keeping the existing region field as optional for now in the usage schemas to avoid breaking the folks that use it, but it's not needed anymore, and I'd like to remove it as well at some point. HTH - Jean-Sebastien
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Bharath Sekar <bsekar14(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sounds good. Thanks Sebastien. I'll watch the thread [1] for updates
|
|
Re: Notifications for service brokers
Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Any update at all?
Thanks - Jean-Sebastien On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < jsdelfino(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi all,
|
|