1. cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org
  2. Messages
   Date   
New lead for Community (CAB) meetings

Swarna Podila
 

Dear CF Community,
Max (popularly known as "Dr. Max", cc'd here) has been running Cloud Foundry Community Advisory Board (CAB) meetings for the past 4-ish years now.  As he mentioned during the recent calls, 2020 is a great opportunity for any of you in the community to nominate yourself (or someone you know is interested) to take the baton from Max.  Max will continue being an active member of our community; we just think that other members may want to take an opportunity to step up and make their mark in our community.  

The responsibilities will be to host 
  • the monthly CAB calls by sourcing interesting topics/demos for the meetings
  • in-person CAB meetings at Cloud Foundry Summits (we, from the Foundation, can help you with that)
If you are unsure of the responsibilities or if you would like to talk to Max directly, please feel free to reach out to him.

Please send us your nominations no later than February 5th. 

-- Swarna Podila (she/her)
Senior
 Director
, Community
 | Cloud Foundry Foundation

You can read more about pronouns here, or please ask if you'd like to find out more.
Re: UAA Deployment #uaa

Dr Nic Williams <drnicwilliams@...>
 

I coded up running UAA locally awhile back and you might find something useful in my scripts, or consider using the scripts yourself


Nic
--
Dr Nic Williams
Stark & Wayne LLC
+61 437 276 076
twitter @drnic
UAA Deployment #uaa

santiago@...
 

Hello,
I'm facing issues when trying to deploy a war file into Tomcat.I can build the file and everything but after deploying it into Tomcat I'm getting the below error.
Can anyone help me? thanks!

Exception

javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet.init() for servlet [spring] threw exception
	org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:541)
	org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92)
	org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:678)
	org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:343)
	org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:367)
	org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65)
	org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:860)
	org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1598)
	org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
	java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
	java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
	org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
	java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)

Root Cause

java.lang.IllegalStateException: Listeners cannot be added to context [/uaa] as the context has been initialised
	org.cloudfoundry.identity.uaa.impl.config.YamlServletProfileInitializer.initialize(YamlServletProfileInitializer.java:80)
	org.cloudfoundry.identity.uaa.impl.config.YamlServletProfileInitializer.initialize(YamlServletProfileInitializer.java:50)
	org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.applyInitializers(FrameworkServlet.java:764)
	org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.configureAndRefreshWebApplicationContext(FrameworkServlet.java:701)
	org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.createWebApplicationContext(FrameworkServlet.java:668)
	org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.createWebApplicationContext(FrameworkServlet.java:716)
	org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.initWebApplicationContext(FrameworkServlet.java:591)
	org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.initServletBean(FrameworkServlet.java:530)
	org.springframework.web.servlet.HttpServletBean.init(HttpServletBean.java:170)
	javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:158)
	org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:541)
	org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92)
	org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:678)
	org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:343)
	org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:367)
	org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65)
	org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:860)
	org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1598)
	org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
	java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
	java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
	org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
	java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
 
Routing Release 0.197.0

Keshav Sharma <ksharma@...>
 

Hello CF community,
Routing Release 0.197.0 has been cut!

Release Highlights

  • Platform Operators can now experience easier debugging using human readable timestamps based on configuration in gorouter.stdout.log details

  • We received feedback that the access.log app_time metric is ambiguous since it includes network time and not just application time. To avoid any confusion for application developers, the gorouter access.log no longer emits the app_time metric details

CF-Bosh Networking
Re: CF vs PAS4BOSH vs PAS4K8s vs TKG

Daniel Jones
 

Ta!

Regards,
Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CTO
+44 (0)79 8000 9153
EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists


On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 15:49, Eric Malm <emalm@...> wrote:
Hi, Daniel,

In general, "PAS" refers to VMware's commercial distribution of CFAR. "PAS4K8s" is shorthand for the K8s-targeted version currently under pre-GA development, and "PAS4BOSH" is the parallel construction referring specifically to the current BOSH-based product. As with Pivotal/VMware's previous commercialized CFAR products, we intend to build PAS4K8s on top of project development taking place openly in the CFF community.

That said, I would encourage commentary on the document to focus on contributions to and development of those CFF projects, and not to any vendor-specific concerns or products.

Thanks,
Eric

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:00 AM Daniel Jones <daniel.jones@...> wrote:
Hi all,

Would it be possible for someone from VMware MAPBU to clarify a few terms for the benefit of the community?
  • Is PAS4BOSH a synonym for CF as currently packaged? Do y'all use the terms interchangeably?
  • Is PAS4K8s simply CF packaged in a Kubernetes-native format, or something else? 
  • Should the community pay heed to discussions about PAS4K8s because that will affect/trickle down to open source CF, or is this proprietary-only code forevermore?
  • Is TKG in any way related to the OSS CF community, or is this an internal project that we should disregard as none of our business?
These questions came up as a result of reading the comments on CF-RFC 030:
  • "are we sure we want to invest that much time and effort in CF?"
  • "Would we imagine doing this in PAS4BOSH? [...] Or maybe just going forward for PAS4K8s and TKG work"
  • "I imagined this only for CF (not PAS4K8S)"
  • "Many teams are shifting focus to PAS4BOSH" (assuming this is a typo and the author meant PAS4K8s)
It's great that folks are having these discussions in the open, and I wouldn't want to discourage this from happening. I also appreciate that things are probably in flux and being figured out currently.

Regards,
Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CTO
+44 (0)79 8000 9153
EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists
Request for Feedback - Cloudfoundry for Kubernetes Integration artifact from Release Integration team

Saikiran Yerram
 

Hi CF Community,

The Release Integration team has been working on a proposal for supporting the integration needs of projects contributing to Cloudfoundry on Kubernetes. We are looking for feedback from the Cloud Foundry Community on what we have proposed so far.

You can find the proposal here.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks
-- 
Saikiran Yerram
Release Integration team
Re: CF vs PAS4BOSH vs PAS4K8s vs TKG

Eric Malm <emalm@...>
 

Hi, Daniel,

In general, "PAS" refers to VMware's commercial distribution of CFAR. "PAS4K8s" is shorthand for the K8s-targeted version currently under pre-GA development, and "PAS4BOSH" is the parallel construction referring specifically to the current BOSH-based product. As with Pivotal/VMware's previous commercialized CFAR products, we intend to build PAS4K8s on top of project development taking place openly in the CFF community.

That said, I would encourage commentary on the document to focus on contributions to and development of those CFF projects, and not to any vendor-specific concerns or products.

Thanks,
Eric


On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:00 AM Daniel Jones <daniel.jones@...> wrote:
Hi all,

Would it be possible for someone from VMware MAPBU to clarify a few terms for the benefit of the community?
  • Is PAS4BOSH a synonym for CF as currently packaged? Do y'all use the terms interchangeably?
  • Is PAS4K8s simply CF packaged in a Kubernetes-native format, or something else? 
  • Should the community pay heed to discussions about PAS4K8s because that will affect/trickle down to open source CF, or is this proprietary-only code forevermore?
  • Is TKG in any way related to the OSS CF community, or is this an internal project that we should disregard as none of our business?
These questions came up as a result of reading the comments on CF-RFC 030:
  • "are we sure we want to invest that much time and effort in CF?"
  • "Would we imagine doing this in PAS4BOSH? [...] Or maybe just going forward for PAS4K8s and TKG work"
  • "I imagined this only for CF (not PAS4K8S)"
  • "Many teams are shifting focus to PAS4BOSH" (assuming this is a typo and the author meant PAS4K8s)
It's great that folks are having these discussions in the open, and I wouldn't want to discourage this from happening. I also appreciate that things are probably in flux and being figured out currently.

Regards,
Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CTO
+44 (0)79 8000 9153
EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists
Re: CF vs PAS4BOSH vs PAS4K8s vs TKG

Davanum Srinivas
 

Daniel,

As i understand it, TKG is an internal project unrelated to either OSS communities (CF or k8s).

Thanks,
Dims


On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 5:00 AM Daniel Jones <daniel.jones@...> wrote:
Hi all,

Would it be possible for someone from VMware MAPBU to clarify a few terms for the benefit of the community?
  • Is PAS4BOSH a synonym for CF as currently packaged? Do y'all use the terms interchangeably?
  • Is PAS4K8s simply CF packaged in a Kubernetes-native format, or something else? 
  • Should the community pay heed to discussions about PAS4K8s because that will affect/trickle down to open source CF, or is this proprietary-only code forevermore?
  • Is TKG in any way related to the OSS CF community, or is this an internal project that we should disregard as none of our business?
These questions came up as a result of reading the comments on CF-RFC 030:
  • "are we sure we want to invest that much time and effort in CF?"
  • "Would we imagine doing this in PAS4BOSH? [...] Or maybe just going forward for PAS4K8s and TKG work"
  • "I imagined this only for CF (not PAS4K8S)"
  • "Many teams are shifting focus to PAS4BOSH" (assuming this is a typo and the author meant PAS4K8s)
It's great that folks are having these discussions in the open, and I wouldn't want to discourage this from happening. I also appreciate that things are probably in flux and being figured out currently.

Regards,
Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CTO
+44 (0)79 8000 9153
EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists



--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
CF vs PAS4BOSH vs PAS4K8s vs TKG

Daniel Jones
 

Hi all,

Would it be possible for someone from VMware MAPBU to clarify a few terms for the benefit of the community?
  • Is PAS4BOSH a synonym for CF as currently packaged? Do y'all use the terms interchangeably?
  • Is PAS4K8s simply CF packaged in a Kubernetes-native format, or something else? 
  • Should the community pay heed to discussions about PAS4K8s because that will affect/trickle down to open source CF, or is this proprietary-only code forevermore?
  • Is TKG in any way related to the OSS CF community, or is this an internal project that we should disregard as none of our business?
These questions came up as a result of reading the comments on CF-RFC 030:
  • "are we sure we want to invest that much time and effort in CF?"
  • "Would we imagine doing this in PAS4BOSH? [...] Or maybe just going forward for PAS4K8s and TKG work"
  • "I imagined this only for CF (not PAS4K8S)"
  • "Many teams are shifting focus to PAS4BOSH" (assuming this is a typo and the author meant PAS4K8s)
It's great that folks are having these discussions in the open, and I wouldn't want to discourage this from happening. I also appreciate that things are probably in flux and being figured out currently.

Regards,
Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CTO
+44 (0)79 8000 9153
EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists
Re: [CF-RFC] 030: Use Consistent Human Readable Timestamps for CF Component Logs

Daniel Jones
 

As someone who has had to debug live CF systems for many years, I'm very pleased to see this.

Regards,
Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CTO
+44 (0)79 8000 9153
EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists


On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 16:54, Amelia Downs <adowns@...> wrote:
Hi All,

Here is a link for a request for comment #030. This is targeted towards teams that provide releases to cf-deployment and to consumers of cf-deployment who read logs.

INTENTION

We intend to have all component jobs to use, or have the option to use, the same human-readable timestamp format for its logs (RFC3339) so that it’s easier for a human to skim logs to find entries for a given time and so that less toil is required to correlate log entries generated by different sub-components.

FEEDBACK

Please add comments or suggested edits inside the RFC document for convergent discussion, rather than replying to this email. Please use the Slack channel (#cf-rfc-030) for information conversation about the RFC and related subjects that may or may not result in suggesting an edit to the document.

DATES

We are planning to start working on this soon. This RFC will be open starting today, and will be closed in two weeks, receiving comments through January 24, 2020.

Thanks,
Amelia Downs and Josh Collins
FINAL REMINDER: CAB call for January 2020 is next week Wednesday 15th @ 8a Pacific

Michael Maximilien
 

Hi, all,
 
Final reminder for the CAB call this Wednesday @ 8a Pacific.
 
In addition to regular business, we have a great talk planned on KubeCF (see below).
 
Finally, please take 5 minutes (might be less) to fill out the survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JX2C28V <= this gives you a way to provide feedback and shape the direction of the CAB calls for 2020 and beyond.
 
I plan to close it tomorrow around noon Pacific and I will present the results during the CAB.
 
All info below. Zoom soon,

------
dr.max
ibm ☁ 
silicon valley, ca
maximilien.org
 
 

----- Original message -----
From: Michael Maximilien/Almaden/IBM
To: cf-dev@...
Cc:
Subject: CAB call for January 2020 is next week Wednesday 15th @ 8a Pacific
Date: Thu, Jan 9, 2020 2:48 PM
 
FYI...
 
CAB call [0] for January 2020 is next week Wednesday 15th @ 8a Pacific.
 
In addition to usual business, we have two planned talks / discussions:
 
1. KubeCF by Vlad Iovanov, Troy Topnik, and SUSE team [1]
2. CAB 2019 Survey Results and Future Direction by me [2]
 
Finally, if you have not taken the survey, please do so now: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JX2C28V
 
It will only take you a few minutes (promise :) and this is your chance to shape the CAB call and provide feedback on how to move forward.
 
Finally, note that I will be at Pivotal SF for this call so if you are in SF join me.
 
Zoom [0] with you soon.
 
Best,

------
dr.max
ibm ☁ 
silicon valley, ca
maximilien.org
 
[CF-RFC] 030: Use Consistent Human Readable Timestamps for CF Component Logs

Amelia Downs
 

Hi All,

Here is a link for a request for comment #030. This is targeted towards teams that provide releases to cf-deployment and to consumers of cf-deployment who read logs.

INTENTION

We intend to have all component jobs to use, or have the option to use, the same human-readable timestamp format for its logs (RFC3339) so that it’s easier for a human to skim logs to find entries for a given time and so that less toil is required to correlate log entries generated by different sub-components.

FEEDBACK

Please add comments or suggested edits inside the RFC document for convergent discussion, rather than replying to this email. Please use the Slack channel (#cf-rfc-030) for information conversation about the RFC and related subjects that may or may not result in suggesting an edit to the document.

DATES

We are planning to start working on this soon. This RFC will be open starting today, and will be closed in two weeks, receiving comments through January 24, 2020.

Thanks,
Amelia Downs and Josh Collins
Re: Uaa.log

Palani Samy <palani160385@...>
 

Hi Team,

Thanks for quick response, here i have already log4j configuration under tomcat lib folder.

But still its now working, uaa.log file is creating under /tomcat/logs/uaa.log

log4j.rootLogger = INFO, CATALINA

# Define all the appenders
log4j.appender.CATALINA = org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.CATALINA.File = ${catalina.base}/logs/catalina
log4j.appender.CATALINA.Append = true
log4j.appender.CATALINA.Encoding = UTF-8
# Roll-over the log once per day
log4j.appender.CATALINA.DatePattern = '.'yyyy-MM-dd'.log'
log4j.appender.CATALINA.layout = org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.CATALINA.layout.ConversionPattern = %d [%t] %-5p %c- %m%n

log4j.appender.LOCALHOST = org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.LOCALHOST.File = ${catalina.base}/logs/localhost
log4j.appender.LOCALHOST.Append = true
log4j.appender.LOCALHOST.Encoding = UTF-8
log4j.appender.LOCALHOST.DatePattern = '.'yyyy-MM-dd'.log'
log4j.appender.LOCALHOST.layout = org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.LOCALHOST.layout.ConversionPattern = %d [%t] %-5p %c- %m%n

log4j.appender.MANAGER = org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.MANAGER.File = ${catalina.base}/logs/manager
log4j.appender.MANAGER.Append = true
log4j.appender.MANAGER.Encoding = UTF-8
log4j.appender.MANAGER.DatePattern = '.'yyyy-MM-dd'.log'
log4j.appender.MANAGER.layout = org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.MANAGER.layout.ConversionPattern = %d [%t] %-5p %c- %m%n

log4j.appender.HOST-MANAGER = org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.HOST-MANAGER.File = ${catalina.base}/logs/host-manager
log4j.appender.HOST-MANAGER.Append = true
log4j.appender.HOST-MANAGER.Encoding = UTF-8
log4j.appender.HOST-MANAGER.DatePattern = '.'yyyy-MM-dd'.log'
log4j.appender.HOST-MANAGER.layout = org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.HOST-MANAGER.layout.ConversionPattern = %d [%t] %-5p %c- %m%n

log4j.appender.CONSOLE = org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender
log4j.appender.CONSOLE.Encoding = UTF-8
log4j.appender.CONSOLE.layout = org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.CONSOLE.layout.ConversionPattern = %d [%t] %-5p %c- %m%n

# Configure which loggers log to which appenders
log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost] = INFO, LOCALHOST
log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/manager] =\
  INFO, MANAGER
log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost].[/host-manager] =\
  INFO, HOST-MANAGER






On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:48 AM Filip Hanik <fhanik@...> wrote:
You can control logging in the log4j configuration file. 

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 20:02 Palani Samy <palani160385@...> wrote:

Hi Team

I deployed cloud foudary war file inside the tomcat, and we can able to access foundry home page in browser.
when i am doing startup.sh to start tomcat server my server is coming up and i can able to see the UI changes in the browser.

Now uaa.log file is available under the /tomcat/logs folder location by default, now the question is i don't want generate uaa.log file in this location, instead of this it should be some where else required.
For example /root/user/logs.

Please find the below logs view structure.
root@linux-vm:/opt/tomcat/apache-tomcat-9.0.26/logs# ls -lrt

-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 manager.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 host-manager.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 localhost_access_log.2019-12-26.txt
-rw-r----- 1 root root 2481 Dec 26 06:12 localhost.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 31443 Dec 26 06:12 catalina.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 179793 Dec 26 06:24 uaa.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 1042803 Dec 26 06:24 catalina.out

Thanks,
Palani
Re: Uaa.log

Filip Hanik
 

You can control logging in the log4j configuration file. 

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 20:02 Palani Samy <palani160385@...> wrote:

Hi Team

I deployed cloud foudary war file inside the tomcat, and we can able to access foundry home page in browser.
when i am doing startup.sh to start tomcat server my server is coming up and i can able to see the UI changes in the browser.

Now uaa.log file is available under the /tomcat/logs folder location by default, now the question is i don't want generate uaa.log file in this location, instead of this it should be some where else required.
For example /root/user/logs.

Please find the below logs view structure.
root@linux-vm:/opt/tomcat/apache-tomcat-9.0.26/logs# ls -lrt

-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 manager.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 host-manager.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 localhost_access_log.2019-12-26.txt
-rw-r----- 1 root root 2481 Dec 26 06:12 localhost.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 31443 Dec 26 06:12 catalina.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 179793 Dec 26 06:24 uaa.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 1042803 Dec 26 06:24 catalina.out

Thanks,
Palani
Uaa.log

Palani Samy <palani160385@...>
 

Hi Team

I deployed cloud foudary war file inside the tomcat, and we can able to access foundry home page in browser.
when i am doing startup.sh to start tomcat server my server is coming up and i can able to see the UI changes in the browser.

Now uaa.log file is available under the /tomcat/logs folder location by default, now the question is i don't want generate uaa.log file in this location, instead of this it should be some where else required.
For example /root/user/logs.

Please find the below logs view structure.
root@linux-vm:/opt/tomcat/apache-tomcat-9.0.26/logs# ls -lrt

-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 manager.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 host-manager.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 0 Dec 26 06:01 localhost_access_log.2019-12-26.txt
-rw-r----- 1 root root 2481 Dec 26 06:12 localhost.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 31443 Dec 26 06:12 catalina.2019-12-26.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 179793 Dec 26 06:24 uaa.log
-rw-r----- 1 root root 1042803 Dec 26 06:24 catalina.out

Thanks,
Palani
RFC Kubernetes-idiomatic Cloud Foundry components guidelines

Oleksandr Slynko
 

Hi everyone,

As you all know Cloud Foundry is moving to the Kubernetes direction. Several teams have started to work on deploying Cloud Foundry projects on Kubernetes.
I have created a document with best practices for applications running in Kubernetes based on my experience working with Kubernetes at CFCR & Eirini.
It might become an official Cloud Foundry document. Feel free to leave your comments.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aVQkmCGmHMuCJS9h1UfO-THcP7ENdqIZe5lYtOzcPPA/edit?ts=5e16cdb3# 
Later I plan to put it in a GitHub repo in Cloud foundry organisation, so it will be more searchable. 

Best regards,
Oleksandr Slynko
CAB call for January 2020 is next week Wednesday 15th @ 8a Pacific

Michael Maximilien
 

FYI...
 
CAB call [0] for January 2020 is next week Wednesday 15th @ 8a Pacific.
 
In addition to usual business, we have two planned talks / discussions:
 
1. KubeCF by Vlad Iovanov, Troy Topnik, and SUSE team [1]
2. CAB 2019 Survey Results and Future Direction by me [2]
 
Finally, if you have not taken the survey, please do so now: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JX2C28V
 
It will only take you a few minutes (promise :) and this is your chance to shape the CAB call and provide feedback on how to move forward.
 
Finally, note that I will be at Pivotal SF for this call so if you are in SF join me.
 
Zoom [0] with you soon.
 
Best,

------
dr.max
ibm ☁ 
silicon valley, ca
maximilien.org
cf CLI v6.49.0 is available

Steve Taylor
 

Hello everyone!

We have just released cf CLI 6.49.0!

The major highlight of this release is that the cf CLI binary is now built with Go 1.13

See the release notes for more information (https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli/releases/tag/v6.49.0)

If you have any feedback on this new release we would love to hear from you.  Please respond via this email or find us in the Cloud Foundry Slack #cli channel.

Thank you!
Steve, and the cf CLI and v3 Acceleration teams
Re: windows buildpacks

Daniel Mikusa
 



On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 9:33 AM jcs42 <joeymizrahi42@...> wrote:
Hi Dan thanks for your response.

I did see this windows bp although it does not help me.
You say that there are some windows buildpacks but the one you provided is
the only one i found.

Here's another. I know Pivotal has some more. I don't know offhand which ones are public/internal though. I just wanted to make the point that it can be done and provide an example if you'd like to have a go at building your own.


I know for a fact Pivotal does not maintain or provide the buildpacks you're looking for on Windows.

Hope that helps!

Dan
 
Was wondering if anyone built a python, nodejs one for windows in the past
and can share. 

Thanks!



--
Sent from: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cf-2Ddev.70369.x6.nabble.com_&d=DwICAg&c=lnl9vOaLMzsy2niBC8-h_K-7QJuNJEsFrzdndhuJ3Sw&r=A6R1A7x3uKhQ4JWX6p3aXisLvnmsdi9T1AuDJmnTSsg&m=WiFa_cZZczRwee2GMborNh2lYrTdMaIfVUwsVVTrFr4&s=9lBAoqEcbsN1AjwQJaRqKjmdLLLKGp_29Z82KqKpd8o&e=



Re: windows buildpacks

jcs42
 

Hi Dan thanks for your response.

I did see this windows bp although it does not help me.
You say that there are some windows buildpacks but the one you provided is
the only one i found.
Was wondering if anyone built a python, nodejs one for windows in the past
and can share.

Thanks!



--
Sent from: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/
561 - 580 of 9398