Re: Proposal to Change CATs Ownership
Utako Ueda
We had a series of meetings to figure out a good path for CATs that ranged
from multiple teams to smaller groups. We met most recently to address concerns that include the following: • Workflow and Release Bumping Issues: CATs relies on calls to specific versions of CC API to run successfully. The CAPI CI currently bumps cloud_controller_ng within capi-release, and on a successful run of CATs (which lives on cf-release develop), capi-release then gets bumped in cf-release develop. This leads to a "chicken and egg" scenario, in that when changes are made to both CATs and CC, both cf-release and capi pipelines are broken until a manual fix is made. • In a world where cf-release no longer exists, how do we ensure CATs uses the correct versions of the CF CLI and CC API? tl;dr: Though not all of the CATs test the CC API explicitly, they all make use of the CC API and therefore make CC a choke point. Having CATs as a separate release may be a good idea, but doesn't necessarily address the strong coupling issues. We'd like to know if there are specific cases in which this will be detrimental to other projects' workflows before moving forward. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Michael Fraenkel < michael.fraenkel(a)gmail.com> wrote: Can you explain why CATs should live under CAPI?CATs now represents acceptance test for all of the Cloud Foundry function driven mainly via the CLI.Tieing this to any one release seems a bit artificial. CATs is about testing the aggregation of all the various releases not just
|
|
Re: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231
Amit Kumar Gupta
Just a heads up, while the community is committed to helping people use CF,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
people here are essentially volunteering their time and hence cannot respond differently to urgent or blocking issues. Also, your new issue seems fairly different from your original issue. I would recommend starting a new thread with a clear title of the issue, it will have a better chance of catching the eye of some of the logging experts. I would even recommend creating a GH issue at github.com/cloudfoundry/loggregator. Best, Amit
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Ben R <vagcom.ben(a)gmail.com> wrote:
|
|
Re: Proposal to Change CATs Ownership
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
I agree with Michael. I think the CATs and Smoke tests should be in their
own release(s). Mike On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Michael Fraenkel < michael.fraenkel(a)gmail.com> wrote: Can you explain why CATs should live under CAPI?
|
|
Re: Incubation request: App Auto-Scaling service
Shannon Coen
The Services PMC accepts App-Autoscaling into incubation.
Thank you to IBM for the contribution, and to Fujitsu and SAP for the commitment to assist in its maintenance and enhancement. Best, Shannon Coen Product Manager, Cloud Foundry Pivotal, Inc. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer(a)us.ibm.com> wrote: awesome!
|
|
Re: Does Diego support memory swap?
Sam Dai
Hi Will,
Thanks your reply, hope can get response from Garden-Linux soon. Thanks, Sam
|
|
[SECURITY][MEDIUM] CVE-2016-2165 - Loggregator Request URL Paths
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
CVE-2016-2165 - Loggregator Request URL Paths
Severity Medium Vendor Cloud Foundry Foundation Versions Affected - cf-release v231 and lower Description The Loggregator Traffic Controller endpoints are not cleansing request URL paths when they are invalid and is returning them in the 404 response. This could allow malicious scripts to be written directly into the 404 response. Mitigation - Upgrade to cf-release v233 [1] (cf-release v232 is not recommended for use) Credit IBM Security, Corelogic References [1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/releases/tag/v233 History 2016-Mar-23: Initial vulnerability report published
|
|
[SECURITY][LOW] CVE-2016-0781 UAA Persistent XSS Vulnerability
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
CVE-2016-0781 UAA Persistent XSS VulnerabilitySeverity
Low Vendor Cloud Foundry Foundation Versions Affected Cloud Foundry v208 through v231 Login-server v1.6 - v1.14 UAA v2.0.0 - v2.7.4.1 & v3.0.0 - v3.2.0 UAA-Release v2 - v7 Description The UAA OAuth approval pages are vulnerable to an XSS attack by specifying malicious java script content in either the OAuth scopes (SCIM groups) or SCIM group descriptions. Mitigation OSS users are strongly encouraged to follow one of the mitigations below: - Upgrade to Cloud Foundry v233 [1] or later - For standalone UAA users - For users using UAA Version 3.0.0, please upgrade to UAA Release to v3.2.1 [3] or later - For users using standalone UAA Version 2.X.X, please upgrade to UAA Release to v2.7.4.2 [2] or v3.2.1 [3] - For users using standalone login-server 1.X, please upgrade to UAA Release to v2.7.4.2 [2] or v3.2.1 [3] - For users using UAA-Release (UAA bosh release), please upgrade to UAA-Release v8 [4] Credit Discovered by the GE Digital Security Team References [1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/releases/tag/v233 [2] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/uaa/releases/tag/2.7.4.2 [3] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/uaa/releases/tag/3.2.1 [4] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/uaa-release/releases/tag/v8 History 2016-Mar-XX: Initial vulnerability report published
|
|
[SECURITY][HIGH] CVE-2016-0780 Cloud Controller Disk Quota Enforcement
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
CVE-2016-0780 Cloud Controller Disk Quota EnforcementSeverity
*High*Vendor *Cloud Foundry Foundation*Versions Affected *cf-release v231 and lower*Description *It was discovered that Cloud Foundry does not properly enforce disk quotas in certain cases. An attacker could use an improper disk quota value to bypass enforcement and consume all the disk on DEAs/Diego Cells causing a potential denial of service for other applications.*Mitigation * - Upgrade to cf-release v233 [1] (cf-release v232 is not recommended for use)*Credit *Fujitsu Limited*References *[1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/releases/tag/v233 <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/releases/tag/v233>*History2016-Mar-23: Initial vulnerability report published
|
|
Re: How to deploy and bind mongodb service to nodejs application?
Amit Kumar Gupta
You need to register the mongo service with the marketplace. There are
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
further instructions in that README.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Vimal Mishra <shiva.lkm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dies,
|
|
Issue with stacks related to removal of libmariadb
Danny Rosen
Hello,
Last week we completed changes to the rootfs that removed libmysqlclient in favor of replacing it with libmariadb [1]. This change was released in cf-released v233. Unfortunately, applications that were previously staged (with stacks v1.45 or earlier) and which depend on the libmysqlclient libraries will fail to to start when they cannot load the mysql client library. A workaround is to delete the application (in order to clear application cache) and restage. Stacks v1.47 will address this by packaging the libmysqlclient files. We expect this will be in the next cf-release. Applications staged using stacks 1.47.0 or later will link against libmariadb, as expected. [1] - https://github.com/cloudfoundry/stacks/issues/30
|
|
Re: cf v231: Issue with new webdav blobstore job
Rich Wohlstadter
That would probably work. I'm wondering if the recursive is even neccessary. The nfs service didnt do that. Why would the webdav replacement? If it does indeed need to be done, then I'm thinking it should be done outside the monit startup or in a way that does not delay webdav from starting otherwise its going to be a continuing issue depending on customer blobstore sizes.
-Rich
|
|
Re: Proposal to Change CATs Ownership
Michael Fraenkel <michael.fraenkel@...>
Can you explain why CATs should live under CAPI?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
CATs now represents acceptance test for all of the Cloud Foundry function driven mainly via the CLI. Tieing this to any one release seems a bit artificial. CATs is about testing the aggregation of all the various releases not just CAPI. I am more surprised that it wasn't suggested to be its own release which dictated the versions for all releases that had passed. - Michael
On 3/22/16 3:05 AM, Utako Ueda wrote:
Hi all,
|
|
How to deploy and bind mongodb service to nodejs application?
Vimal Mishra
Hi Dies,
I have deployed cf on my local machine and trying to push my nodejs application and bind mongodb services.I am using following cf version -- cf -v : cf version 6.16.1+924508c-2016-02-26 Stemcell info ------------- Name: bosh-warden-boshlite-ubuntu-trusty-go_agent Version: 3147 I have followed the following steps for cloud foundry deployment on local machine : 1. Installed virtual box and vagrant. 2. wget -O spiff.zip https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/spiff/releases/download/v1.0.7/ <https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/spiff/releases/download/v1.0.7/spiff_linux_amd64.zip> 3. unzip spiff.zip 4. export PATH=`pwd`:$PATH 5. git clone https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-lite 6. git clone https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release 7. export CF_RELEASE_DIR=`pwd`/cf-release 8. cd bosh-lite 9. bin/provision_cf 10. bin/add-routes After these steps I am able to use cf login and create org and space. Then I ran the command cf marketplace ,following message was displayed : *Getting services from marketplace in org RelevanceLab / space RLCatalyst as admin... OK No service offerings found* So I have tried to deploy the services and followed instruction mentioned on following link . https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-services-contrib-release 1. bosh upload release https://cf-contrib.s3.amazonaws.com/boshrelease-cf-services-contrib-6.tgz 2. git clone https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-services-contrib-release.git 3. cd cf-services-contrib-release 4. git checkout v6 5. templates/make_manifest warden 6. bosh -n deploy Then ran the command cf marketplace.It displays the same message " No service offerings found". Can you please confirm that process followed is correct or what could be the problem or How can I deploy services and use? That would be great help. Thanks Vimal Mishra
|
|
Re: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231
Vik R <vagcom.ben@...>
Can you curl that endpoint. Have you added cert and private key for uaa?
Ben On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) <ngnanase(a)cisco.com> wrote: Hi
|
|
Failed to deploy diego 0.1452.0 on openstack: database_z2/0 is not running after update
Yunata, Ricky <rickyy@...>
Hi,
I'm currently deploying diego on my openstack environment, however I got an error when it was updating database_z2 Below is the error message from debug.log <Bosh::Director::AgentJobNotRunning: `database_z2/0 (16c88d30-fe70-4d42-8307-34cc85521ca7)' is not running after update. Review logs for failed jobs: etcd> My environment are: Stemcell : Ubuntu-trusty Version 3192 CF Release : Version 230 Diego : Version 0.1452.0 Etcd : Version 38 Garden-linux : Version 0.334.0 I'm experiencing similar error as this, however the solution didn't work for me. https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/diego-release/issues/119 This is what I'm seeing on my error log Monit summary Process 'etcd' not monitored Process 'bbs' running Process 'consul_agent' running Process 'metron_agent' running System 'system_localhost' running etcd_ctl.err.log [2016-03-23 01:22:33+0000] + /var/vcap/packages/etcd/etcdctl -ca-file=/var/vcap/jobs/etcd/config/certs/server-ca.crt -cert-file=/var/vcap/jobs/etcd/config/certs/client.crt -key-file=/var/vcap/jobs/etcd/config/certs/client.key -C https://database-z2-0.etcd.service.cf.internal:4001 ls [2016-03-23 01:22:33+0000] Error: cannot sync with the cluster using endpoints https://database-z2-0.etcd.service.cf.internal:4001 etcd.stderr.log 2016/03/23 00:56:52 etcdmain: couldn't find local name "database-z2-0" in the initial cluster configuration consul_agent.stdout.log 2016/03/23 01:23:26 [WARN] agent: Check 'service:etcd' is now critical 2016/03/23 01:23:29 [WARN] agent: Check 'service:etcd' is now critical 2016/03/23 01:23:32 [WARN] agent: Check 'service:etcd' is now critical 2016/03/23 01:23:35 [WARN] agent: Check 'service:etcd' is now critical 2016/03/23 01:23:38 [WARN] agent: Check 'service:etcd' is now critical 2016/03/23 01:23:41 [WARN] agent: Check 'service:etcd' is now critical 2016/03/23 01:23:41 [WARN] dns: node 'database-z2-0' failing health check 'service:etcd: Service 'etcd' check', dropping from service 'etcd' 2016/03/23 01:23:41 [WARN] dns: node 'database-z2-0' failing health check 'service:etcd: Service 'etcd' check', dropping from service 'etcd' 2016/03/23 01:23:42 [WARN] dns: node 'database-z2-0' failing health check 'service:etcd: Service 'etcd' check', dropping from service 'etcd' 2016/03/23 01:23:42 [WARN] dns: node 'database-z2-0' failing health check 'service:etcd: Service 'etcd' check', dropping from service 'etcd' This is when I run bosh instances --ps +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | Instance | State | AZ | VM Type | IPs | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | access_z1/0 (598f16db-60c2-4c13-bcec-85ae2a38102d)* | running | n/a | access_z1 | 192.168.3.44 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | access_z2/0 (a83d049d-6c95-417e-84f4-9aced8a9136f)* | running | n/a | access_z2 | 192.168.4.56 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | brain_z1/0 (a95c56bb-a84d-41b4-91b1-ade57c773dbe)* | running | n/a | brain_z1 | 192.168.3.40 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | brain_z2/0 (eb386b16-c8e4-4c04-9582-20f4161f6e03)* | running | n/a | brain_z2 | 192.168.4.52 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | cc_bridge_z1/0 (b9870145-26d7-4e59-9358-97c43db6a110)* | running | n/a | cc_bridge_z1 | 192.168.3.42 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | cc_bridge_z2/0 (7477b06f-e501-4757-abda-8e29c7c15464)* | running | n/a | cc_bridge_z2 | 192.168.4.54 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | cell_z1/0 (a6ef0a8c-52c0-4bd2-abfb-2fcf0101dd24)* | running | n/a | cell_z1 | 192.168.3.41 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | cell_z2/0 (36f012e3-2013-44aa-9a92-18161d6854ad)* | running | n/a | cell_z2 | 192.168.4.53 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | database_z1/0 (5428cca8-9832-42f4-9b3a-a822eb6d7e96)* | running | n/a | database_z1 | 192.168.3.39 | | etcd | running | | | | | bbs | running | | | | | consul_agent | running | | | | | metron_agent | running | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | database_z2/0 (16c88d30-fe70-4d42-8307-34cc85521ca7)* | failing | n/a | database_z2 | 192.168.4.51 | | etcd | unknown | | | | | bbs | running | | | | | consul_agent | running | | | | | metron_agent | running | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | database_z3/0 (c802162f-0681-479e-bb9c-98dac7d78941)* | running | n/a | database_z3 | 192.168.5.31 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | route_emitter_z1/0 (f7f7a8f3-9784-4b99-b0a5-6efb4d193cf5)* | running | n/a | route_emitter_z1 | 192.168.3.43 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ | route_emitter_z2/0 (7f4e7fb7-7986-432e-a2e3-b298d3070753)* | running | n/a | route_emitter_z2 | 192.168.4.55 | +------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-----+------------------+--------------+ I tried to stop all running etcds on database_z1 and database_z2, then `rm -rf /var/vcap/store/etcd/*` on both of the VMs and monit start the etcd process again. It seems that only 1 etcd service can be run. If I monit start etcd on the database_z2 first before database_z1, database_z2 will be running, instead database_z1 will fail. But, if I do it on database_z1 first before database_z2, then database_z1 will be running and database_z2 will fail. Anyone has an idea on how to solve this? Thanks Regards Ricky Disclaimer The information in this e-mail is confidential and may contain content that is subject to copyright and/or is commercial-in-confidence and is intended only for the use of the above named addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, copying or use of the information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please telephone Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd on + 61 2 9452 9000 or by reply e-mail to the sender and delete the document and all copies thereof. Whereas Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd would not knowingly transmit a virus within an email communication, it is the receiver’s responsibility to scan all communication and any files attached for computer viruses and other defects. Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd does not accept liability for any loss or damage (whether direct, indirect, consequential or economic) however caused, and whether by negligence or otherwise, which may result directly or indirectly from this communication or any files attached. If you do not wish to receive commercial and/or marketing email messages from Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd, please email unsubscribe(a)fast.au.fujitsu.com
|
|
Re: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231
Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM@Cisco) <ngnanase at cisco.com...>
Hi
Gentle reminder.. Sorry it’s a kind of blocking issue for us. Regards Nithiyasri From: Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 5:29 PM To: 'Amit Gupta' <agupta(a)pivotal.io> Cc: Gwenn Etourneau <getourneau(a)pivotal.io>; Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall. <cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org>; Jayarajan Ramapurath Kozhummal (jayark) <jayark(a)cisco.com> Subject: RE: [cf-dev] Re: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231 Hi Amit/Gwenn We are getting the following error while doing cf push and unable to see the logs.. Warning: error tailing logs Error dialing loggregator server: local error: record overflow. Please ask your Cloud Foundry Operator to check the platform configuration (loggregator endpoint is wss://loggregator.testinceptionjk.cisco.com:80). Starting app logconsumerms in org vms / space app as admin.. I googled and updated the loggegrator port from 80 to 4443. I observed a different error and the endpoint begins with ws:. Previously it was wss: Warning: error tailing logs Error dialing loggregator server: unexpected EOF. Please ask your Cloud Foundry Operator to check the platform configuration (loggregator endpoint is ws://loggregator.testinceptionjk.cisco.com:4443). Properties: logger_endpoint: port: 4443 The spiff generated manifest has zero instances of loggregator. The same has been used by us. Regards Nithiyasri From: Amit Gupta [mailto:agupta(a)pivotal.io] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:16 AM To: Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) <ngnanase(a)cisco.com<mailto:ngnanase(a)cisco.com>> Cc: Gwenn Etourneau <getourneau(a)pivotal.io<mailto:getourneau(a)pivotal.io>>; Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall. <cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org<mailto:cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org>>; Jayarajan Ramapurath Kozhummal (jayark) <jayark(a)cisco.com<mailto:jayark(a)cisco.com>> Subject: Re: [cf-dev] Re: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231 Awesome! On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) <ngnanase(a)cisco.com<mailto:ngnanase(a)cisco.com>> wrote: Thank you Gwenn and Amit The fix works. Regards Nitiyasri From: Gwenn Etourneau [mailto:getourneau(a)pivotal.io<mailto:getourneau(a)pivotal.io>] Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 4:38 AM To: Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall. <cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org<mailto:cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org>> Cc: Amit Gupta <agupta(a)pivotal.io<mailto:agupta(a)pivotal.io>>; Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) <ngnanase(a)cisco.com<mailto:ngnanase(a)cisco.com>> Subject: Re: [cf-dev] Re: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231 Hi, What is the value of uaa.require_https in your manifest ? By default is true, try to put to false Thanks On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Jayarajan Ramapurath Kozhummal (jayark) <jayark(a)cisco.com<mailto:jayark(a)cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Amit, Thanks a lot for your support as always! Please see the detailed logs you are looking for:- root(a)testinceptionjk:/opt/cisco/vms-installer/tenant-testinceptionjk/cf-deploy# cf login API endpoint: https://api.testinceptionjk.cisco.com<https://api.testinceptionjk.cisco.com/> REQUEST: [2016-03-18T16:30:28Z] GET /v2/info HTTP/1.1 Host: api.testinceptionjk.cisco.com<http://api.testinceptionjk.cisco.com> Accept: application/json Content-Type: application/json User-Agent: go-cli 6.12.2-24abed3 / linux RESPONSE: [2016-03-18T16:30:28Z] HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 632 Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:30:28 GMT Server: nginx X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff X-Vcap-Request-Id: 1cffe445-b169-426f-61fe-f421654bf997 X-Vcap-Request-Id: a4da6848-66c7-4375-6509-3688b69232a2::fbaf3999-67d2-4fd4-b35e-c02c2af15281 {"name":"","build":"","support":"http://support.cloudfoundry.com","version":0,"description":"","authorization_endpoint":"http://uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com","token_endpoint":"http://uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com","min_cli_version":null,"min_recommended_cli_version":null,"api_version":"2.51.0","app_ssh_endpoint":"ssh.testinceptionjk.cisco.com:2222<http://ssh.testinceptionjk.cisco.com:2222>","app_ssh_host_key_fingerprint":null,"app_ssh_oauth_client":"ssh-proxy","routing_endpoint":"https://api.testinceptionjk.cisco.com/routing","logging_endpoint":"wss://loggregator.testinceptionjk.cisco.com:80<http://loggregator.testinceptionjk.cisco.com:80>","doppler_logging_endpoint":"wss://doppler.testinceptionjk.cisco.com:4443<http://doppler.testinceptionjk.cisco.com:4443>"} REQUEST: [2016-03-18T16:30:28Z] GET /login HTTP/1.1 Host: uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com<http://uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com> Accept: application/json Content-Type: application/json User-Agent: go-cli 6.12.2-24abed3 / linux REQUEST: [2016-03-18T16:30:28Z] GET /login HTTP/0.0 Host: uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com<http://uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com> Accept: application/json Referer: http://uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com/login User-Agent: go-cli 6.12.2-24abed3 / linux RESPONSE: [2016-03-18T16:30:28Z] HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 487 Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate Cache-Control: no-store Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: application/json;charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:30:28 GMT Expires: 0 Pragma: no-cache Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000 ; includeSubDomains X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff X-Frame-Options: DENY X-Vcap-Request-Id: 7a845595-63f4-4c97-5397-52ffca0f2f4b X-Xss-Protection: 1; mode=block {"app":{"version":"3.1.0"},"links":{"uaa":"http://uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com","passwd":"https://console.testinceptionjk.cisco.com/password_resets/new","login":"http://login.testinceptionjk.cisco.com","register":"https://console.testinceptionjk.cisco.com/register"},"zone_name":"uaa","entityID":"login.testinceptionjk.cisco.com<http://login.testinceptionjk.cisco.com>","commit_id":"9b5c13d","idpDefinitions":{},"prompts":{"username":["text","Email"],"password":["password","Password"]},"timestamp":"2016-02-05T14:27:13+0000"} Email> admin Password> Authenticating... REQUEST: [2016-03-18T16:30:35Z] POST /oauth/token HTTP/1.1 Host: uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com<http://uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com> Accept: application/json Authorization: [PRIVATE DATA HIDDEN] Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded User-Agent: go-cli 6.12.2-24abed3 / linux grant_type=password&password=[PRIVATE DATA HIDDEN]&scope=&username=admin RESPONSE: [2016-03-18T16:30:35Z] HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Content-Length: 1086 Content-Language: en Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:30:35 GMT Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 X-Vcap-Request-Id: fbe5f151-ae1f-48fa-673d-f002dd3ab04f <html><head><title>Apache Tomcat/7.0.61 - Error report</title><style><!--H1 {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:22px;} H2 {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:16px;} H3 {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:14px;} BODY {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:white;} B {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;} P {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;background:white;color:black;font-size:12px;}A {color : black;}A.name {color : black;}HR {color : #525D76;}--></style> </head><body><h1>HTTP Status 400 - {"error": "request must be over https"}</h1><HR size="1" noshade="noshade"><p><b>type</b> Status report</p><p><b>message</b> <u>{"error": "request must be over https"}</u></p><p><b>description</b> <u>The request sent by the client was syntactically incorrect.</u></p><HR size="1" noshade="noshade"><h3>Apache Tomcat/7.0.61</h3></body></html> Server error, status code: 400, error code: , message: Password> Authenticating... REQUEST: [2016-03-18T16:30:42Z] POST /oauth/token HTTP/1.1 Host: uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com<http://uaa.testinceptionjk.cisco.com> Accept: application/json Authorization: [PRIVATE DATA HIDDEN] Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded User-Agent: go-cli 6.12.2-24abed3 / linux grant_type=password&password=[PRIVATE DATA HIDDEN]&scope=&username=admin RESPONSE: [2016-03-18T16:30:42Z] HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Content-Length: 1086 Content-Language: en Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:30:42 GMT Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 X-Vcap-Request-Id: bfa611f1-46bc-42de-4b81-37e40bab8fe7 <html><head><title>Apache Tomcat/7.0.61 - Error report</title><style><!--H1 {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:22px;} H2 {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:16px;} H3 {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;font-size:14px;} BODY {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:white;} B {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;color:white;background-color:#525D76;} P {font-family:Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif;background:white;color:black;font-size:12px;}A {color : black;}A.name {color : black;}HR {color : #525D76;}--></style> </head><body><h1>HTTP Status 400 - {"error": "request must be over https"}</h1><HR size="1" noshade="noshade"><p><b>type</b> Status report</p><p><b>message</b> <u>{"error": "request must be over https"}</u></p><p><b>description</b> <u>The request sent by the client was syntactically incorrect.</u></p><HR size="1" noshade="noshade"><h3>Apache Tomcat/7.0.61</h3></body></html> Server error, status code: 400, error code: , message: Password> Thanks Jayaraj From: Amit Gupta <agupta(a)pivotal.io<mailto:agupta(a)pivotal.io>> Date: Friday, March 18, 2016 at 11:37 AM To: "Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco)" <ngnanase(a)cisco.com<mailto:ngnanase(a)cisco.com>> Cc: "Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall." <cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org<mailto:cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org>>, Jayarajan Ramapurath Kozhummal <jayark(a)cisco.com<mailto:jayark(a)cisco.com>> Subject: Re: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231 Can you do: CF_TRACE=true cf login so we can get more info about where that 400 response code is coming from. Best, Amit On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) <ngnanase(a)cisco.com<mailto:ngnanase(a)cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Amit Bosh deployment has completed successfully. I could set the endpoint, but I could not login to it with the credentials I have given in the properties. Logs and properties below. root(a)testdeploy:/deploy# cf login API endpoint: https://api.testdeploy.cisco.com Email> admin Password> Authenticating... Server error, status code: 400, error code: , message: Password> Authenticating... Server error, status code: 400, error code: , message: PROPERTIES:: scim: # external_groups: null # groups: null userids_enabled: true users: - admin|<%= $common_password %>|scim.write,scim.read,openid,cloud_controller.admin,uaa.admin,password.write - services|<%= $common_password %>|scim.write,scim.read,openid,cloud_controller.admin #spring_profiles: null Regards Nithiyasri From: Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 7:23 AM To: 'Amit Gupta' <agupta(a)pivotal.io<mailto:agupta(a)pivotal.io>> Cc: Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall. <cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org<mailto:cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org>>; Jayarajan Ramapurath Kozhummal (jayark) <jayark(a)cisco.com<mailto:jayark(a)cisco.com>> Subject: RE: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231 Hi Amit Thanks for your quick reply. Pls let me know in which Vm , should I login to see the compilation logs.. Previously when I did the upgrade, it dint compile the individual packages. Logs below. Kindly let me know why is it trying to compile individual package now. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Started preparing package compilation > Finding packages to compile. Done (00:00:00) Started preparing dns > Binding DNS. Done (00:00:00) Regards Nithiyasri From: Amit Gupta [mailto:agupta(a)pivotal.io] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 5:36 AM To: Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) <ngnanase(a)cisco.com<mailto:ngnanase(a)cisco.com>> Cc: Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall. <cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org<mailto:cf-dev(a)lists.cloudfoundry.org>>; Jayarajan Ramapurath Kozhummal (jayark) <jayark(a)cisco.com<mailto:jayark(a)cisco.com>> Subject: Re: Reg the upgrade from cf-205 to cf-231 I'm not sure why it's taking >40 mins to compile some simple go binaries. You may have network issues (compilation jobs taking a long time to download dependencies from BOSH director blobstore, or upload compiled resulting artifacts) or you may need more CPU on your compilation machines. You can try to SSH into the compilation VMs while they're running to see what they're doing over those 40 minutes. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Nithiyasri Gnanasekaran -X (ngnanase - TECH MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) <ngnanase(a)cisco.com<mailto:ngnanase(a)cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Amit I was able to do an upgrade of deployment from cf-205 to cf-231 multiple times. But now, I am getting timeout errors while compiling buildpacks once in rootfs or in buildpack_java or in nginx.. Could you pls help us resolve this error.. Following is the one: Done compiling packages > buildpack_java/d65c2d20fc067c9995c18d195e0ff117ea9202c0 (00:24:23) Done compiling packages > rtr/2d7de4f6fc25938c21c5be87174f95583feb14b5 (00:38:22) Failed compiling packages > rootfs_cflinuxfs2/ac0ba35f1106af81cb735eb56360c6cc924af83a: Timed out waiting for Server `3c04cecc-1308-4da f-8dc5-b9c1924004c3' to be active (00:41:23) Failed compiling packages > nginx/bf3af6163e13887aacd230bbbc5eff90213ac6af: Timed out waiting for Server `fbbb8647-1415-46d9-92de-d030f 4164b6b' to be active (00:43:31) Failed compiling packages > cli/b61b75716312df9f4f7c81a17f3a7de456efce71: Timed out waiting for Server `223ec673-b66d-4362-8e27-0859805 2ebe5' to be active (00:44:49) Error 100: Timed out waiting for Server `3c04cecc-1308-4daf-8dc5-b9c1924004c3' to be active Regards Nithiyasri
|
|
they opted for aura kingdom gold
baizhou2324 <baizhou2324@...>
Meanwhile Interpol helps Vgolds to develop an globally human body to fight
unlawful gambling in football. The globally police agency said that football's regulating human body sought Interpol's support at a session previously recently and they opted for aura kingdom gold <http://www.vgolds.com/ > develop an globally task energy. "We know that unlawful activities gambling is frequently managed by organized criminal activity categories willing to damaged gamers and regulators as well as to use energy and risks to gather overdue debts," said Interpol's associate common, Ronald Respectable. An Interpol-led operation in 2008 focusing on unlawful gambling rings led to more than 1,300 busts and the seizure of more nearly 10m.As the Vgolds Globe prize came in Cpe City on Wednesday night, Danny Jordaan, the designer of next summer's competitors, announced "the loss of life of doubt". www.vgolds.com <http://www.vgolds.com/ > -- View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/they-opted-for-aura-kingdom-gold-tp4288.html Sent from the CF Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
Re: Connection refused - api.10.244.0.22.xip.io:443
Wayne Ha <wayne.h.ha@...>
Amit,
Thanks for your help. I tried api.bosh-lite.com and it works fine: admin(a)CT-Test-v231:~$ ping -c 1 api.bosh-lite.com PING api.bosh-lite.com (10.244.0.34) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.244.0.34: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.664 ms --- api.bosh-lite.com ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.664/0.664/0.664/0.000 ms Thanks,
|
|
CC BUILDPACK_SET App Usage Events
Nicholas Calugar
Hi CF-Dev,
We are continuing work on the Cloud Controller V3 API and had a question about a particular App Usage Event we write as part of V2, the BUILDPACK_SET event. The test[1] around this indicates that we write the app usage event when staging completes and the app is still started. In V2, apps, packages, and droplets are very tightly coupled, so writing this event here makes sense. In V3, apps, packages, and droplets are first class resources and we don't stage apps, we stage packages to create droplets. Furthermore, staging with a particular buildpack does not affect the app until the droplet is assigned to the app as the current droplet and the current droplet can be changed to any valid droplet for the app. Staging completion and the app being started no longer seem to correlate to the buildpack being "set". With the above differences, we are hoping to understand the use-case around the BUILDPACK_SET event so we can correctly preserve the desired behavior for V3. I'll likely have follow up questions, but the first thing I'd like to know is what BUILDPACK_SET indicates to downstream billing engines. Thanks, -Nick Nicholas Calugar CAPI Product Manager Pivotal Software, Inc. [1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng/blob/45b311f18d8ad1184dcb647081b19eca6f1eaf83/spec/unit/models/runtime/app_spec.rb#L1345-L1369
|
|
Re: Sourcey buildpack not working on Diego
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
Thanks for raising the issue here as well, Aaron, and I'm glad to see we
got a fix figured out for that buildpack. I've added a story ( https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/116149519) to the Buildpacks tracker to document more clearly what bits are captured from the staging-task container into the droplet, so that other buildpack authors have more definitive guidance on how to compile and arrange vendored dependencies. Best, Eric On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:08 PM, aaron_huber <aaron.m.huber(a)intel.com> wrote: I've got a few customers using the Sourcey buildpack along with
|
|