Re: Service broker authors: have you ever changed your service or plan names?
Subhankar Chattopadhyay <subho.atg@...>
It would be good to have plan renaming feature, also would be good to
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
have it only as display name so that it can be changed without much of dependency. We have also faced similar situations previously.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Mike Youngstrom <youngm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We have renamed plans and services in the past. I would like to be able to --
Subhankar Chattopadhyay Bangalore, India
|
|
Re: Cloud foundry buildpack to support openJFX
Peter Dotchev <dotchev@...>
Hi,
Try the binary buildpack or a Docker image. There you have most flexibility. Best regards, Petar On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Raghuvamsi Uthpala < Raghuvamsi.Uthpala(a)indegene.com> wrote: Hi Team,
|
|
Re: Service broker authors: have you ever changed your service or plan names?
Mike Youngstrom
We have renamed plans and services in the past. I would like to be able to
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
continue to update them in the future. But I wouldn't consider it a must have feature but it does has come in handy in the past. Mike
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Shannon Coen <scoen(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
The Service Broker API currently supports modifying the service name and
|
|
Service broker authors: have you ever changed your service or plan names?
Shannon Coen
The Service Broker API currently supports modifying the service name and
plan name fields, as a uuid is used as the unique identifier. These names are used in CLI workflows, and are used by applications to parse the VCAP_SERVICES environment variable to identify credentials. In practice, if these names are changed it may require updating an application to use the new service name to identify credentials. The metadata field is often used to expose display names for services and plans. The Open Service Broker API working group is interested to know how often these names actually change, and whether they could be considered immutable in the future. Best, Shannon Coen Product Manager, Cloud Foundry Pivotal, Inc.
|
|
Re: Cloud foundry buildpack to support openJFX
Stephen Levine
Hi Raghuvamsi,
It may be worth opening an issue about this on the Java buildpack Github issue tracker[1]. [1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack/issues Thanks, Stephen On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Raghuvamsi Uthpala < Raghuvamsi.Uthpala(a)indegene.com> wrote: Hi Team,
|
|
Re: bosh lite v2
David Sabeti
Hi cf-dev,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
To add to this, I wanted to clarify what the Release Integration team is currently validating, and what we will plan to validate, in our pipelines. *Currently* We validate cf-release against the deprecated Vagrant workflow, and cf-deployment against the new bosh-lite workflow that uses bosh-deployment as described on bosh.io. *In the near future -- about two weeks* We're going to switch to using the bosh-deployment workflow for cf-release, and support that for the remainder of cf-release's lifetime. cf-deployment will continue to be validated on the bosh-deployment workflow as well. *tl;dr - The Release Integration team will stop validating the Vagrant workflow for bosh-lite in two weeks, so please switch to using the workflow described on bosh.io <http://bosh.io>* Thanks, David Sabeti CF Release Integration Project Lead
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:05 PM Dmitriy Kalinin <dkalinin(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
+cf-dev
|
|
Re: Any simple stub file of cloud foundry deployment on openstack
Natalie Bennett
cf-deployment will be going GA over the next couple of months, and
production transitions between cf-release and cf-deployment will be painful. (My team is working on the first one now.) If you set up with cf-deployment and give David Sabeti (PM of the team making it) feedback about any features you need, you'll save yourself a lot of time and pain. You'll also be able to use BOSH to generate all your certs automatically. - Natalie Pivotal Cloud Operations On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:49 AM Arpit Sharma <arpitvipulsharma(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi David McClure,
|
|
Re: Any simple stub file of cloud foundry deployment on openstack
Hi David McClure,
I have tried above mentioned method, but I am getting error like this: Task 101 07:35:43 | Preparing deployment: Preparing deployment (00:00:00) L Error: Required property 'networks' was not specified in object ({}) 07:35:44 | Error: Required property 'networks' was not specified in object ({}) Started Tue Aug 8 07:35:43 UTC 2017 Finished Tue Aug 8 07:35:44 UTC 2017 Duration 00:00:01 Task 101 error Updating deployment: Expected task '101' to succeed but state is 'error' Exit code 1 Can you help me with this?
|
|
Re: Any simple stub file of cloud foundry deployment on openstack
Hi David McClure,
Got the link. Thanks for your response. Let me check and try with this.
|
|
Re: Any simple stub file of cloud foundry deployment on openstack
Hey David,
The link which you shared me, it is giving 404 error.
|
|
Re: Any simple stub file of cloud foundry deployment on openstack
Hi David McClure,
Right now I am preparing this for testing environment. But surely after this proof of concept , It will be on production environment.
|
|
Re: bosh lite v2
Dmitriy Kalinin <dkalinin@...>
+cf-dev
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dmitriy Kalinin <dkalinin(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
hey all,
|
|
EOL TCP-Emitter
Shannon Coen
Since Diego-Release v1.21.0, the Route Emitter job has supported
registration of both HTTP routes (via NATS) and TCP routes (via Routing API). This makes the TCP-Emitter in the Routing-Release no longer necessary. The Routing team will drop the TCP-Emitter job from Routing-Release in v0.164.0. To configure the Route Emitter to register TCP routes, configure the following properties in your manifest for the router-emitter job: tcp.enabled: true routing_api.url: defaults to http://routing-api.service.cf.internal routing_api.port: defaults to 3000 routing_api.auth_enabled: defaults to true We also recommend running the route-emitter job in "Local Mode", as this removes a dependency on Consul for a distributed lock. This can be configured by colocating the job on each Cell and configuring the following property: diego.route_emitter.local_mode: true. Please reply with questions or concerns. Thank you! Shannon Coen Product Manager, Cloud Foundry Pivotal, Inc.
|
|
Re: Any simple stub file of cloud foundry deployment on openstack
David McClure
Is this for production or testing?
If its for testing, definitely check out cf-deployment <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-deployment> which uses new features of bosh to generate certs and keys for you automatically. If its for production, keep an eye on this table <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-deployment#readiness>. I'm not sure what the most straightforward thing to do is with cf-release these days. I know many releases maintained their own scripts to generate certs and keys, so that's one option. Another would be to use cf-deployment with bosh interpolate to generate all the certs, keys and passwords, and then copy those into the necessary slots in the cf-release stubs or manifests. On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Arpit Sharma <arpitvipulsharma(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear Team,
|
|
Any simple stub file of cloud foundry deployment on openstack
Dear Team,
I am planning to deploy cloudfoundry on openstack. I have deployed bosh on openstack. But Stub manifest file asking for lot of certs and keys. Any simple stub file? so atleast i can just check how cloudfoundry works. Thanks & Regards: Arpit
|
|
CAPI team is Looking for App Devs to Participate in CF Research
Kimberly Eberz
Hello!
Christine Lee and I are designers on the CAPI team, and we are looking for Application Developers to participate in user research in the coming weeks - to get a better understanding of the app dev lifecycle, and needs around uptime. If you're open to spending ~30 min sharing about your experience using CF, please use this form to sign up for a time: https://goo.gl/forms/54xNBIuDZmvnlqey1 We'd really appreciate the opportunity to learn about some of your needs and painpoints using CF. Thank you in advance! Cheers, Kim Eberz and Christine Lee Pivotal Product Designers on CAPI
|
|
Re: Runtime PMC - Garden Windows (Greenhouse) Project Lead Call for Nominations
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
Hello all,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Pivotal is nominating Colin Jackson for the Garden Windows (Greenhouse) Project Lead in the Runtime PMC. Colin joined Pivotal in February 2015 as an engineer on the Buildpacks team in New York, while the team was adopting the PHP buildpack. He also worked on Lattice, a frontend CLI and canonical deployment, and anchored a PCF team. Colin transitioned to a PM role in September 2016, and has been shadowing A William Martin over the past few months on Greenhouse. Any other nominations should be sent to me/in reply by end of day August 7th, 2017. If you have any questions about the role/process, please let me know. These are described in the CFF governance documents. [1] -Dieu Cao Runtime PMC Lead [1] https://www.cloudfoundry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/CFF_Development_Operations_Policy.pdf
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Dieu Cao <dcao(a)pivotal.io> wrote:
Hello all,
|
|
Removing Diego cell asset-cache path configurability
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
Hi, all,
The Diego team is planning to remove a minor piece of configurability in diego-release, but wanted first to verify that it will have no substantial impact to operators. *If you have never configured the diego.executor.cache_path property for your Diego cells, feel free to stop reading now.* This property controls the location of the cache of downloaded assets (primarily buildpacks and droplets) on the Diego cells. We intend to change its location to a fixed subdirectory of /var/vcap/data/rep as part of consolidating the Diego rep job's working directory structure on a BOSH-deployed VM in https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/149742283, but we realized that it does happen to be configurable via the above BOSH property. As we understand it, any significant change to this value (say, moving it to another mounted volume) never even worked at all: the cell uses rename(2) to move files between this directory and other directories hard-coded to be on the BOSH ephemeral disk, and rename does not work across volumes. In any case, if having this value always be hard-coded in your CF or Diego deployments will be a problem, please let me know why. Thanks, Eric, CF Diego PM
|
|
Runtime PMC - Garden Windows (Greenhouse) Project Lead Call for Nominations
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
Hello all,
A William Martin, the Project Lead for the Garden Windows (Greenhouse) team within the Runtime PMC, will be focusing more of his time on the BOSH Windows team in the BOSH PMC. We thank him for his time serving as the Garden Windows Project Lead. The Garden Windows team, primarily located in New York, New York, now has an opening for its project lead. The team currently maintains the Garden Windows release. Project leads must be nominated by a Cloud Foundry Foundation member. Please send nominations to me/in reply to this posting by end of day August 7th, 2017. If you have any questions about the role/process, please let me know. These are described in the CFF governance documents. [1] -Dieu Cao Runtime PMC Lead [1] https://www.cloudfoundry.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ CFF_Development_Operations_Policy.pdf
|
|
Re: Difference Between Cloud foundry and Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
You could try this: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-mysql-release
Once you have the broker up and running, you add it to the local CF marketplace (see service broker docs on docs.cloudfoundry.org) On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:40 AM Sunil Valmiki <sunilhvalmiki(a)gmail.com> wrote: Ya David, I followed your links and I can successfully push app and run-- Chip Childers CTO, Cloud Foundry Foundation 1.267.250.0815
|
|