|
Re: CF Application Runtime PMC - CF Bits-Service Project Lead Call for Nominations
Hello all,
IBM is nominating Peter Goetz for theCF Bits Service Project Lead in the Application Runtime PMC.
Peter is a Software Engineer at IBMworking both as a core contributor to the Cloud Foundry
Hello all,
IBM is nominating Peter Goetz for theCF Bits Service Project Lead in the Application Runtime PMC.
Peter is a Software Engineer at IBMworking both as a core contributor to the Cloud Foundry
|
By
Simon D Moser
·
#8154
·
|
|
CF Application Runtime PMC - CF Bits-Service Project Lead Call for Nominations
Hello All,
Simon Moser, the Project Lead for the Bits-Service team within the Application Runtime PMC, is rotating into a different role within IBM. We thank him for his time serving as the
Hello All,
Simon Moser, the Project Lead for the Bits-Service team within the Application Runtime PMC, is rotating into a different role within IBM. We thank him for his time serving as the
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#8153
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for weighted routing user experience in Cloud Foundry
Use case: I want v1-stable to receive 5 times more traffic than each individual upgrade version I deploy
Phase 1: Deploy alpha 1
Proposed (sum MUST add up to a 100):
v1-stable: 83
v2-alpha1:
Use case: I want v1-stable to receive 5 times more traffic than each individual upgrade version I deploy
Phase 1: Deploy alpha 1
Proposed (sum MUST add up to a 100):
v1-stable: 83
v2-alpha1:
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#8152
·
|
|
Re: cf-deployment 3.0
I’m going to agree with Marco’s concerns here. Making life harder and less stable for the end users of CF has a real potential to alienate and push away the CF userbase altogether, even if it’s
I’m going to agree with Marco’s concerns here. Making life harder and less stable for the end users of CF has a real potential to alienate and push away the CF userbase altogether, even if it’s
|
By
Franks, Geoff
·
#8151
·
|
|
Re: Deprecate route-sync from CFCR to CFAR
Hi Arghya,
You have mentioned in Github that you were able to overcome this issue.
For everyone else, here is the context and a bit more information.
History
In very early CFCR days, we did not
Hi Arghya,
You have mentioned in Github that you were able to overcome this issue.
For everyone else, here is the context and a bit more information.
History
In very early CFCR days, we did not
|
By
Oleksandr Slynko
·
#8150
·
|
|
Re: cf-deployment 3.0
Dear Josh,
Thanks for the context, I wasn't aware of what happened before the release of networking 2.0. To stick with your example, though: From what you are saying I have understood that you would
Dear Josh,
Thanks for the context, I wasn't aware of what happened before the release of networking 2.0. To stick with your example, though: From what you are saying I have understood that you would
|
By
Marco Voelz
·
#8149
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for weighted routing user experience in Cloud Foundry
aaarrgh, there is a bug in my psuedo code
clusterWeight = [v1,v1,v1,v1,v1,v1,v2,v2,v2,v3,v3] should be
clusterWeight = [v1,v1,v1,v1,v1,v1,v2,v2,v2,v3,v4]
Full solution:
Implementation: "Randomized
aaarrgh, there is a bug in my psuedo code
clusterWeight = [v1,v1,v1,v1,v1,v1,v2,v2,v2,v3,v3] should be
clusterWeight = [v1,v1,v1,v1,v1,v1,v2,v2,v2,v3,v4]
Full solution:
Implementation: "Randomized
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#8148
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for weighted routing user experience in Cloud Foundry
I put a long comment in the doc, maybe comments are good for short notes. here is the spiel
"The sum of weights must add to 100"
I would say this is where being user friendly ends. If I add reviews-v4
I put a long comment in the doc, maybe comments are good for short notes. here is the spiel
"The sum of weights must add to 100"
I would say this is where being user friendly ends. If I add reviews-v4
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#8147
·
|
|
Proposal for weighted routing user experience in Cloud Foundry
The CF Routing team has received feedback from many users that support for weighted routing would make it easier to accomplish their goals. We have a proposal on the preferred user experience for
The CF Routing team has received feedback from many users that support for weighted routing would make it easier to accomplish their goals. We have a proposal on the preferred user experience for
|
By
Shubha Anjur Tupil
·
#8146
·
|
|
Re: cf-deployment 3.0
Hi Marco,
I'm happy to provide more context on the container networking 2.0 reference.
The container networking team submitted a PR to cf-deployment with changes required for them to ship v2.0.
Hi Marco,
I'm happy to provide more context on the container networking 2.0 reference.
The container networking team submitted a PR to cf-deployment with changes required for them to ship v2.0.
|
By
Josh Collins
·
#8145
·
|
|
Re: Deprecate route-sync from CFCR to CFAR
That issue could be addressed by having CFCR use a different router group, which is part of the solution we have proposed here:
That issue could be addressed by having CFCR use a different router group, which is part of the solution we have proposed here:
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#8144
·
|
|
Re: Deprecate route-sync from CFCR to CFAR
Also: I suspect that the CFCR route-sync feature has a dangerous interaction with CFAR Cloud Controller, if both CFCR and CFAR are sharing a TCP Routing API. CFAR Cloud Controller creates and uses a
Also: I suspect that the CFCR route-sync feature has a dangerous interaction with CFAR Cloud Controller, if both CFCR and CFAR are sharing a TCP Routing API. CFAR Cloud Controller creates and uses a
|
By
Gabriel Rosenhouse <grosenhouse@...>
·
#8143
·
|
|
Re: Deprecate route-sync from CFCR to CFAR
Hi Oleksandr,
What alternative do we have if we want to use kubectl with tls
Thanks,
Arghya
Hi Oleksandr,
What alternative do we have if we want to use kubectl with tls
Thanks,
Arghya
|
By
arghya88@...
·
#8142
·
|
|
Deprecate route-sync from CFCR to CFAR
Hi, cf-dev
Almost one year ago CFCR has added the ability to expose applications using CFAR gorouter. This was an experiment.
We haven't added any changes to this feature for one year and plan to
Hi, cf-dev
Almost one year ago CFCR has added the ability to expose applications using CFAR gorouter. This was an experiment.
We haven't added any changes to this feature for one year and plan to
|
By
Oleksandr Slynko
·
#8141
·
|
|
Feature Narrative / Proposal: Let's fix* CPU Sharing and Metrics in CF!
Hi cf-dev-
Here is a feature narrative. The feature narrative is called "Let's Fix CPU Sharing and Metrics in CF" (but actually it's just a proposal to make them quite a lot better). More information
Hi cf-dev-
Here is a feature narrative. The feature narrative is called "Let's Fix CPU Sharing and Metrics in CF" (but actually it's just a proposal to make them quite a lot better). More information
|
By
Julz Friedman
·
#8140
·
|
|
Re: [cf-bosh] Incubation proposal: CF Containerization
Thank you for submitting this proposal. Let's shoot for collecting and resolving most of the comments in the next month by Aug 10th and voting at that time to incubate it in BOSH PMC.
Thank you for submitting this proposal. Let's shoot for collecting and resolving most of the comments in the next month by Aug 10th and voting at that time to incubate it in BOSH PMC.
|
By
Dmitriy Kalinin <dkalinin@...>
·
#8139
·
|
|
Re: BlockHeads Broker - Proposal for Incubation in the Extensions
Hi, all,
It’s been about one month since this proposal has been submitted. I don’t see any pending unresolved issues or comments.
Therefore, according to our process [0] and Nima’s request to
Hi, all,
It’s been about one month since this proposal has been submitted. I don’t see any pending unresolved issues or comments.
Therefore, according to our process [0] and Nima’s request to
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#8138
·
|
|
Re: cf-deployment 3.0
Dear Josh,
You are correct, in the past the RelInt team hasn't provided security releases. Instead, the credo was to go forward with the regular releases to also get the newest security fixes.
Dear Josh,
You are correct, in the past the RelInt team hasn't provided security releases. Instead, the credo was to go forward with the regular releases to also get the newest security fixes.
|
By
Marco Voelz
·
#8137
·
|
|
CAB call for July is Wednesday 07/18 @ 8a PST or 11a EST
FYI...
Please remember to join the Zoom call [0] Wednesday July 18th at 8a Pacific for QAs, highlights, and two presentations:
1. Project Shield v8 Updates by James Hunt of Stark & Wayne [1]
2.
FYI...
Please remember to join the Zoom call [0] Wednesday July 18th at 8a Pacific for QAs, highlights, and two presentations:
1. Project Shield v8 Updates by James Hunt of Stark & Wayne [1]
2.
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#8136
·
|
|
Re: Clarification regarding Custom roles in CF
Hi there,
Thank you for the feedback!
Unfortunately it's not currently possible to customize the existing roles or add new roles to the system. However, we (the CF Permissions team) are working on
Hi there,
Thank you for the feedback!
Unfortunately it's not currently possible to customize the existing roles or add new roles to the system. However, we (the CF Permissions team) are working on
|
By
Christopher Brown
·
#8135
·
|