|
UAA required configuration
#cf
I'm trying to build UAA on localhost (Window 10 Home)
After running command "$ ./gradlew run"
And finished (I think so) execute at 97%
I running command:
"$ curl -H "Accept: application/json"
I'm trying to build UAA on localhost (Window 10 Home)
After running command "$ ./gradlew run"
And finished (I think so) execute at 97%
I running command:
"$ curl -H "Accept: application/json"
|
By
williamnguyen167@...
·
#8227
·
|
|
Re: Polyglot Service Discovery is Generally Available
Wahoo!!!!
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#8226
·
|
|
Re: Polyglot Service Discovery is Generally Available
Congrats CF Networking Team!
Congrats CF Networking Team!
|
By
Zach Robinson
·
#8225
·
|
|
Polyglot Service Discovery is Generally Available
Hello All,
Polyglot Service Discovery is now Generally Available in cf-deployment version 3.4.0. Here is the feature narrative that we had shared previously and contains the latest updates.
We made an
Hello All,
Polyglot Service Discovery is now Generally Available in cf-deployment version 3.4.0. Here is the feature narrative that we had shared previously and contains the latest updates.
We made an
|
By
Preethi Varambally
·
#8224
·
|
|
Re: Service Instance Sharing is now GA
Awesome feature. Congrats Services API Team!
Awesome feature. Congrats Services API Team!
|
By
Zach Robinson
·
#8223
·
|
|
Service Instance Sharing is now GA
Hello CF Devs,
We are happy to announce that Service Instance Sharing is now Generally Available starting from CF Deployment 3.4.0 (CAPI Release 1.66.0).
This functionality is turned off by default
Hello CF Devs,
We are happy to announce that Service Instance Sharing is now Generally Available starting from CF Deployment 3.4.0 (CAPI Release 1.66.0).
This functionality is turned off by default
|
By
Sam Gunaratne
·
#8222
·
|
|
Re: REQUEST for REVIEW - Proposed Scope for CF-Deployment v4.0
Dear Josh,
Thanks for starting this process for cf-deployment 4.0!
Announcing coming changes and also changes that didn't make it in 4.0 addresses some of the concerns I raised about cf-deployment
Dear Josh,
Thanks for starting this process for cf-deployment 4.0!
Announcing coming changes and also changes that didn't make it in 4.0 addresses some of the concerns I raised about cf-deployment
|
By
Marco Voelz
·
#8221
·
|
|
REQUEST for REVIEW - Proposed Scope for CF-Deployment v4.0
Hello Fellow Cloud-Foundrians,
Based on the feedback generated during the cf-deployment v3.0 retro and observations of the impact of 3.0 on the CF development community CI's, I'd like to share and
Hello Fellow Cloud-Foundrians,
Based on the feedback generated during the cf-deployment v3.0 retro and observations of the impact of 3.0 on the CF development community CI's, I'd like to share and
|
By
Josh Collins
·
#8220
·
|
|
NOTICE: [go-buildpack] Default Go version will change from 1.8.x to 1.10.x after 2018-09-17
The default version of Go will be updated to 1.10.x in the first release after 2018-09-17.
Per the Go release website, Go versions that are two releases behind the latest major release are not
The default version of Go will be updated to 1.10.x in the first release after 2018-09-17.
Per the Go release website, Go versions that are two releases behind the latest major release are not
|
By
Scott Sisil
·
#8219
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Improving Security for HTTP Ingress to CFAR Application Containers
Huh, something weird has been going on with the permissions on that document: this is the third time now that I've had to change them back to allowing global comments. If for some reason that reverts
Huh, something weird has been going on with the permissions on that document: this is the third time now that I've had to change them back to allowing global comments. If for some reason that reverts
|
By
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
·
#8218
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Improving Security for HTTP Ingress to CFAR Application Containers
Oh man, after re-reading your email it now makes sense. To be honest I didn't actually read the document you provided since it wasn't open for read to everyone so I just assumed what was in there
Oh man, after re-reading your email it now makes sense. To be honest I didn't actually read the document you provided since it wasn't open for read to everyone so I just assumed what was in there
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#8217
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Improving Security for HTTP Ingress to CFAR Application Containers
Great, thanks for letting me know. Just to clarify, route integrity on its own (enabled via
Great, thanks for letting me know. Just to clarify, route integrity on its own (enabled via
|
By
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
·
#8216
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Improving Security for HTTP Ingress to CFAR Application Containers
Got it.
We would probably not deploy the improved http ingress until tcp and ssh are both working. Our priority from the improvements in http ingress have been more on the reliable side and less on
Got it.
We would probably not deploy the improved http ingress until tcp and ssh are both working. Our priority from the improvements in http ingress have been more on the reliable side and less on
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#8215
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Improving Security for HTTP Ingress to CFAR Application Containers
Hey, Mike,
Not quite: in the initial form of this more secured configuration, neither CF SSH nor TCP routing will work at all, as their gateway/front/edge routers would not have the network pathway
Hey, Mike,
Not quite: in the initial form of this more secured configuration, neither CF SSH nor TCP routing will work at all, as their gateway/front/edge routers would not have the network pathway
|
By
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
·
#8214
·
|
|
PHP Buildpack Config Feedback
Hi All!
To anyone out there using the PHP buildpack. We're trying to understand if what the buildpack does currently to configure Nginx + PHP-FPM so that it works within the defined memory limits
Hi All!
To anyone out there using the PHP buildpack. We're trying to understand if what the buildpack does currently to configure Nginx + PHP-FPM so that it works within the defined memory limits
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#8213
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Improving Security for HTTP Ingress to CFAR Application Containers
We would love to have greater route integrity and security for our HTTP clients. If configuring this would provide those improvements to HTTP but not for TCP and SSH, we would still deploying it just
We would love to have greater route integrity and security for our HTTP clients. If configuring this would provide those improvements to HTTP but not for TCP and SSH, we would still deploying it just
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#8212
·
|
|
Re: [cf-bosh] Incubation proposal: CF Containerization
Thank you for the great news Marco!
Cheers,
Vlad
Thank you for the great news Marco!
Cheers,
Vlad
|
By
vlad.iovanov@...
·
#8211
·
|
|
Re: [cf-bosh] Incubation proposal: CF Containerization
Hi everyone,
The BOSH PMC voted unanimously in favor of incubating the CF Containerization project. Welcome to Vlad and the team!
Warm regards
Marco
Hi everyone,
The BOSH PMC voted unanimously in favor of incubating the CF Containerization project. Welcome to Vlad and the team!
Warm regards
Marco
|
By
Marco Voelz
·
#8210
·
|
|
REMINDER: CAB call for August is Wednesday 08/15 @ 8a PST or 11a EST + TALKS AGENDA
Quick reminder for the call on Wednesday and announcing two talks:
1. Using Istio Pilot and Envoy for Edge Routing in Cloud Foundry [1] by Shubha Anjur Tupil of Pivotal
2. Update on Project Eirini:
Quick reminder for the call on Wednesday and announcing two talks:
1. Using Istio Pilot and Envoy for Edge Routing in Cloud Foundry [1] by Shubha Anjur Tupil of Pivotal
2. Update on Project Eirini:
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#8209
·
|
|
Re: [cf-bosh] Incubation proposal: CF Containerization
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the comments, discussions and suggestions everyone! The deadline for raising major concerns before we go on with the usual incubation process ended on August 10th. I don't see
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the comments, discussions and suggestions everyone! The deadline for raising major concerns before we go on with the usual incubation process ended on August 10th. I don't see
|
By
Marco Voelz
·
#8208
·
|