|
Re: [vcap-dev] Java OOM debugging
This Java native memory leak debugging war story from a Twitter engineer
is very interesting:
http://www.evanjones.ca/java-native-leak-bug.html
Tweet is
This Java native memory leak debugging war story from a Twitter engineer
is very interesting:
http://www.evanjones.ca/java-native-leak-bug.html
Tweet is
|
By
Lari Hotari <Lari@...>
·
#231
·
|
|
[IMPORTANT] lucid64 stack removal planned with next final cf-release.
Hello all,
As a follow on to the original notice [1], I wanted to clarify that we plan
to remove the lucid64 stack from cf-release with the next final cf-release
that we hope to make available in the
Hello all,
As a follow on to the original notice [1], I wanted to clarify that we plan
to remove the lucid64 stack from cf-release with the next final cf-release
that we hope to make available in the
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#220
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
Ive only had a brief look, my graphite server does not seem to have the
same set of stats for each dea and doppler node, but where i can draw a
comparison is that the dopplers in z2 and 3 are
Ive only had a brief look, my graphite server does not seem to have the
same set of stats for each dea and doppler node, but where i can draw a
comparison is that the dopplers in z2 and 3 are
|
By
john mcteague <john.mcteague@...>
·
#219
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
I also don't expect that to be the source of your CPU imbalance.
Well, the bad news is that the easy stuff checks out, so I have no idea
what's actually wrong. I'll keep suggesting diagnostics, but I
I also don't expect that to be the source of your CPU imbalance.
Well, the bad news is that the easy stuff checks out, so I have no idea
what's actually wrong. I'll keep suggesting diagnostics, but I
|
By
John Tuley <jtuley@...>
·
#218
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
- From etcd I see 5 unique entries, all 5 doppler hosts are listed with
the correct zone
- All metron_agent.json files list the correct zone name
- All doppler.json files also contain the
- From etcd I see 5 unique entries, all 5 doppler hosts are listed with
the correct zone
- All metron_agent.json files list the correct zone name
- All doppler.json files also contain the
|
By
john mcteague <john.mcteague@...>
·
#217
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
John,
Can you verify (on, say one runner in each of your zones) that Metron's
local configuration has the correct zone? (Look in
/var/vcap/jobs/metron_agent/config/metron.json.)
Can you also verify
John,
Can you verify (on, say one runner in each of your zones) that Metron's
local configuration has the correct zone? (Look in
/var/vcap/jobs/metron_agent/config/metron.json.)
Can you also verify
|
By
John Tuley <jtuley@...>
·
#216
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
We are using cf v204 and all loggregators are the same size and config
(other than zone).
The distribution of requests across app instances is fairly even as far as
I can see.
John.
We are using cf v204 and all loggregators are the same size and config
(other than zone).
The distribution of requests across app instances is fairly even as far as
I can see.
John.
|
By
john mcteague <john.mcteague@...>
·
#215
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
Diego is very much usable at this point and we're encouraging beta testers to start putting workloads on it. Check out github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/diego for all things Diego.
Diego supports
Diego is very much usable at this point and we're encouraging beta testers to start putting workloads on it. Check out github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/diego for all things Diego.
Diego supports
|
By
Onsi Fakhouri <ofakhouri@...>
·
#214
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
Another question, what is the status of Diego? Is there an expected date
for its release?
Is it useable already?
If I understand correctly, Diego doesn't supports cron-like jobs, but will
facilitate
Another question, what is the status of Diego? Is there an expected date
for its release?
Is it useable already?
If I understand correctly, Diego doesn't supports cron-like jobs, but will
facilitate
|
By
Corentin Dupont <corentin.dupont@...>
·
#213
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
those are exciting use cases, thank you for sharing the background!
wrote:
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
those are exciting use cases, thank you for sharing the background!
wrote:
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
|
By
James Bayer
·
#212
·
|
|
Re: List Reply-To behavior
I've asked the admin team to make this adjustment. Thanks for pointing this
out!
Chip Childers | Technology Chief of Staff | Cloud Foundry Foundation
I've asked the admin team to make this adjustment. Thanks for pointing this
out!
Chip Childers | Technology Chief of Staff | Cloud Foundry Foundation
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#211
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2015-1834 CC Path Traversal vulnerability
Thank you for the quick response, Dieu!
--
View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-CVE-2015-1834-CC-Path-Traversal-vulnerability-tp163p176.html
Sent from the CF Dev
Thank you for the quick response, Dieu!
--
View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-CVE-2015-1834-CC-Path-Traversal-vulnerability-tp163p176.html
Sent from the CF Dev
|
By
Noburou TANIGUCHI
·
#209
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
Hi James, thanks for the answer!
We are interested to implement a job scheduler for CF. Do you think this
could be interesting to have?
We are working in a project called DC4Cities
Hi James, thanks for the answer!
We are interested to implement a job scheduler for CF. Do you think this
could be interesting to have?
We are working in a project called DC4Cities
|
By
Corentin Dupont <cdupont@...>
·
#208
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2015-1834 CC Path Traversal vulnerability
Yes, that's the correct commit to cherry pick for the cc path traversal
vulnerability.
-Dieu
CF Runtime PM
Yes, that's the correct commit to cherry pick for the cc path traversal
vulnerability.
-Dieu
CF Runtime PM
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#207
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2015-1834 CC Path Traversal vulnerability
I understand the CFF strongly recommends to upgrade to v208 or after, but for
those (including us) who cannot immediately upgrade, I want to know if there
is a workaround against this
I understand the CFF strongly recommends to upgrade to v208 or after, but for
those (including us) who cannot immediately upgrade, I want to know if there
is a workaround against this
|
By
Noburou TANIGUCHI
·
#206
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
Hi John,
I'll be working on this with engineering in the morning; thanks for the
details thus far.
This is puzzling: Metrons do not route traffic to dopplers outside
their zone today. If all
Hi John,
I'll be working on this with engineering in the morning; thanks for the
details thus far.
This is puzzling: Metrons do not route traffic to dopplers outside
their zone today. If all
|
By
Erik Jasiak <ejasiak@...>
·
#205
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
Correct, thanks.
By
john mcteague <john.mcteague@...>
·
#204
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
there is ongoing work to support process types using buildpacks, so that
the same application codebase could be used for multiple different types of
processes (web, worker, etc).
once process types
there is ongoing work to support process types using buildpacks, so that
the same application codebase could be used for multiple different types of
processes (web, worker, etc).
once process types
|
By
James Bayer
·
#203
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
To complete my request, I'm thinking of something like this in the
manifest.yml:
applications:
- name: virusscan
memory: 512M
instances: 1
*schedule: - startFrom : a date
To complete my request, I'm thinking of something like this in the
manifest.yml:
applications:
- name: virusscan
memory: 512M
instances: 1
*schedule: - startFrom : a date
|
By
Corentin Dupont <cdupont@...>
·
#202
·
|
|
scheduler
Hi guys,
just to know, is there a project to add a job scheduler in Cloud Foundry?
I'm thinking of something like the Heroku scheduler (
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/scheduler).
That would be
Hi guys,
just to know, is there a project to add a job scheduler in Cloud Foundry?
I'm thinking of something like the Heroku scheduler (
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/scheduler).
That would be
|
By
Corentin Dupont <corentin.dupont@...>
·
#201
·
|