|
Re: Multiple Availability Zone
I updated my bosh (using bosh-init) with enabling
ignore_server_availability_zone. but it still failed when I deployed my cf.
Anything suggestion?
openstack: &openstack
auth_url:
I updated my bosh (using bosh-init) with enabling
ignore_server_availability_zone. but it still failed when I deployed my cf.
Anything suggestion?
openstack: &openstack
auth_url:
|
By
iamflying
·
#239
·
|
|
Re: Diego Question
Dan,
We announce the PWS's CF version on status.run.pivotal.io:
About This Site
If you encounter any issues please contact support(a)run.pivotal.io. Pivotal
Web Services is the latest public
Dan,
We announce the PWS's CF version on status.run.pivotal.io:
About This Site
If you encounter any issues please contact support(a)run.pivotal.io. Pivotal
Web Services is the latest public
|
By
Karen Wang <khwang@...>
·
#238
·
|
|
Diego Question
I was testing an app on Diego today and part of the test was for the app to
fail. I simulated this by putting some garbage into the `-c` argument of
`cf push`. This had the right effect and my app
I was testing an app on Diego today and part of the test was for the app to
fail. I simulated this by putting some garbage into the `-c` argument of
`cf push`. This had the right effect and my app
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#237
·
|
|
(No subject)
We recently experienced a similar issue. Not sure if it is the same. But
it was caused when we moved the nfs_mounter job template to the first item
in the list of templates for the CC job. We moved
We recently experienced a similar issue. Not sure if it is the same. But
it was caused when we moved the nfs_mounter job template to the first item
in the list of templates for the CC job. We moved
|
By
Abderrahim Chibani
·
#236
·
|
|
Re: api and api_worker jobs fail to bosh update, but monit start OK
We have environments on stemcell 2977 that are running well.
We have an environment using NFS that ran into that same issue and we have
this bug open. [1]
Specifying the nfs_mounter job last should
We have environments on stemcell 2977 that are running well.
We have an environment using NFS that ran into that same issue and we have
this bug open. [1]
Specifying the nfs_mounter job last should
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#235
·
|
|
Re: api and api_worker jobs fail to bosh update, but monit start OK
We recently experienced a similar issue. Not sure if it is the same. But
it was caused when we moved the nfs_mounter job template to the first item
in the list of templates for the CC job. We moved
We recently experienced a similar issue. Not sure if it is the same. But
it was caused when we moved the nfs_mounter job template to the first item
in the list of templates for the CC job. We moved
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#234
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
Hi, Corentin,
Diego, like the DEAs, supports evacuation of LRP instances during
controlled shutdown of a cell VM (the analog of a single DEA in Diego's
architecture). If you're using BOSH to deploy
Hi, Corentin,
Diego, like the DEAs, supports evacuation of LRP instances during
controlled shutdown of a cell VM (the analog of a single DEA in Diego's
architecture). If you're using BOSH to deploy
|
By
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
·
#233
·
|
|
Re: [vcap-dev] bosh create release --force
The script that is executing at the time is:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/blob/master/packages/uaa/pre_packaging#L36
So what my suggestion is to test if this works is that you can
The script that is executing at the time is:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release/blob/master/packages/uaa/pre_packaging#L36
So what my suggestion is to test if this works is that you can
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#232
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
Some other questions:
- is there a consolidation mechanism? From what I can see from the videos,
Diego is only doing load balancing when allocating an application to a DEA.
What is more important to
Some other questions:
- is there a consolidation mechanism? From what I can see from the videos,
Diego is only doing load balancing when allocating an application to a DEA.
What is more important to
|
By
Corentin Dupont <corentin.dupont@...>
·
#230
·
|
|
Cloud Foundry Warden Mechanism
I need some help here. I have been working on this for a week now and have
researched the entire web but I couldn¹t find any relevant resource to this.
1. Lib/warden/container/linux.rb I am
I need some help here. I have been working on this for a week now and have
researched the entire web but I couldn¹t find any relevant resource to this.
1. Lib/warden/container/linux.rb I am
|
By
Kenneth Ham <kenneth.ham@...>
·
#229
·
|
|
api and api_worker jobs fail to bosh update, but monit start OK
Hi,
I'm experiencing a weird situation where api and api_worker jobs fail to
update through bosh and end up being reported as "not running". However,
manually running "monit start
Hi,
I'm experiencing a weird situation where api and api_worker jobs fail to
update through bosh and end up being reported as "not running". However,
manually running "monit start
|
By
Guillaume Berche
·
#228
·
|
|
Does DEA have any limitation on the network resources for warden containers a DEA
I have a small environment with old version as 183
It only has one DEA, having couple apps running on that, it suddenly stop
working when deploying apps (staging) without any obvious error and
I have a small environment with old version as 183
It only has one DEA, having couple apps running on that, it suddenly stop
working when deploying apps (staging) without any obvious error and
|
By
Shaozhen Ding
·
#227
·
|
|
Re: Multiple Availability Zone
Try telling BOSH to ignore what AZ the server is in when provisioning disks:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh/blob/master/release/jobs/director/spec#L395
It will default to cinders default AZ
Try telling BOSH to ignore what AZ the server is in when provisioning disks:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh/blob/master/release/jobs/director/spec#L395
It will default to cinders default AZ
|
By
John McTeague
·
#226
·
|
|
Multiple Availability Zone
Hi,
I am trying to deploy cf into Openstack with multiple computing nodes.
Computer node 1: has all openstack services running, including cinder
service (az1)
Computer node 2: has computing
Hi,
I am trying to deploy cf into Openstack with multiple computing nodes.
Computer node 1: has all openstack services running, including cinder
service (az1)
Computer node 2: has computing
|
By
iamflying
·
#225
·
|
|
Re: Release Notes for v210
The cf-release v210 was released on May 23rd, 2015
Runtime
- Addressed USN-2617-1 <http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2617-1/>
CVE-2015-3202
The cf-release v210 was released on May 23rd, 2015
Runtime
- Addressed USN-2617-1 <http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2617-1/>
CVE-2015-3202
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#224
·
|
|
Re: metron_agent.deployment
Thanks Ivan! That is exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks Ivan! That is exactly what I was looking for.
|
By
Diego Lapiduz <diego@...>
·
#223
·
|
|
Re: metron_agent.deployment
For all the loggregator processes, you will be able to find their
configuration properties in their respective spec and ERB files in
For all the loggregator processes, you will be able to find their
configuration properties in their respective spec and ERB files in
|
By
Ivan Sim <ivans@...>
·
#222
·
|
|
metron_agent.deployment
Hi all,
I've been trying to figure out an issue here while upgrading to 210 from
208.
It seems that a requirement has been added to the deployment manifests for
a "metron_agent.deployment" property
Hi all,
I've been trying to figure out an issue here while upgrading to 210 from
208.
It seems that a requirement has been added to the deployment manifests for
a "metron_agent.deployment" property
|
By
Diego Lapiduz <diego@...>
·
#221
·
|
|
Re: [vcap-dev] Java OOM debugging
This Java native memory leak debugging war story from a Twitter engineer
is very interesting:
http://www.evanjones.ca/java-native-leak-bug.html
Tweet is
This Java native memory leak debugging war story from a Twitter engineer
is very interesting:
http://www.evanjones.ca/java-native-leak-bug.html
Tweet is
|
By
Lari Hotari <Lari@...>
·
#231
·
|
|
[IMPORTANT] lucid64 stack removal planned with next final cf-release.
Hello all,
As a follow on to the original notice [1], I wanted to clarify that we plan
to remove the lucid64 stack from cf-release with the next final cf-release
that we hope to make available in the
Hello all,
As a follow on to the original notice [1], I wanted to clarify that we plan
to remove the lucid64 stack from cf-release with the next final cf-release
that we hope to make available in the
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#220
·
|