|
Re: Doppler zoning query
John,
Can you verify (on, say one runner in each of your zones) that Metron's
local configuration has the correct zone? (Look in
/var/vcap/jobs/metron_agent/config/metron.json.)
Can you also verify
John,
Can you verify (on, say one runner in each of your zones) that Metron's
local configuration has the correct zone? (Look in
/var/vcap/jobs/metron_agent/config/metron.json.)
Can you also verify
|
By
John Tuley <jtuley@...>
·
#216
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
We are using cf v204 and all loggregators are the same size and config
(other than zone).
The distribution of requests across app instances is fairly even as far as
I can see.
John.
We are using cf v204 and all loggregators are the same size and config
(other than zone).
The distribution of requests across app instances is fairly even as far as
I can see.
John.
|
By
john mcteague <john.mcteague@...>
·
#215
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
Diego is very much usable at this point and we're encouraging beta testers to start putting workloads on it. Check out github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/diego for all things Diego.
Diego supports
Diego is very much usable at this point and we're encouraging beta testers to start putting workloads on it. Check out github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/diego for all things Diego.
Diego supports
|
By
Onsi Fakhouri <ofakhouri@...>
·
#214
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
Another question, what is the status of Diego? Is there an expected date
for its release?
Is it useable already?
If I understand correctly, Diego doesn't supports cron-like jobs, but will
facilitate
Another question, what is the status of Diego? Is there an expected date
for its release?
Is it useable already?
If I understand correctly, Diego doesn't supports cron-like jobs, but will
facilitate
|
By
Corentin Dupont <corentin.dupont@...>
·
#213
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
those are exciting use cases, thank you for sharing the background!
wrote:
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
those are exciting use cases, thank you for sharing the background!
wrote:
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
|
By
James Bayer
·
#212
·
|
|
Re: List Reply-To behavior
I've asked the admin team to make this adjustment. Thanks for pointing this
out!
Chip Childers | Technology Chief of Staff | Cloud Foundry Foundation
I've asked the admin team to make this adjustment. Thanks for pointing this
out!
Chip Childers | Technology Chief of Staff | Cloud Foundry Foundation
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#211
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2015-1834 CC Path Traversal vulnerability
Thank you for the quick response, Dieu!
--
View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-CVE-2015-1834-CC-Path-Traversal-vulnerability-tp163p176.html
Sent from the CF Dev
Thank you for the quick response, Dieu!
--
View this message in context: http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-CVE-2015-1834-CC-Path-Traversal-vulnerability-tp163p176.html
Sent from the CF Dev
|
By
Noburou TANIGUCHI
·
#209
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
Hi James, thanks for the answer!
We are interested to implement a job scheduler for CF. Do you think this
could be interesting to have?
We are working in a project called DC4Cities
Hi James, thanks for the answer!
We are interested to implement a job scheduler for CF. Do you think this
could be interesting to have?
We are working in a project called DC4Cities
|
By
Corentin Dupont <cdupont@...>
·
#208
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2015-1834 CC Path Traversal vulnerability
Yes, that's the correct commit to cherry pick for the cc path traversal
vulnerability.
-Dieu
CF Runtime PM
Yes, that's the correct commit to cherry pick for the cc path traversal
vulnerability.
-Dieu
CF Runtime PM
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#207
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2015-1834 CC Path Traversal vulnerability
I understand the CFF strongly recommends to upgrade to v208 or after, but for
those (including us) who cannot immediately upgrade, I want to know if there
is a workaround against this
I understand the CFF strongly recommends to upgrade to v208 or after, but for
those (including us) who cannot immediately upgrade, I want to know if there
is a workaround against this
|
By
Noburou TANIGUCHI
·
#206
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
Hi John,
I'll be working on this with engineering in the morning; thanks for the
details thus far.
This is puzzling: Metrons do not route traffic to dopplers outside
their zone today. If all
Hi John,
I'll be working on this with engineering in the morning; thanks for the
details thus far.
This is puzzling: Metrons do not route traffic to dopplers outside
their zone today. If all
|
By
Erik Jasiak <ejasiak@...>
·
#205
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
Correct, thanks.
By
john mcteague <john.mcteague@...>
·
#204
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
there is ongoing work to support process types using buildpacks, so that
the same application codebase could be used for multiple different types of
processes (web, worker, etc).
once process types
there is ongoing work to support process types using buildpacks, so that
the same application codebase could be used for multiple different types of
processes (web, worker, etc).
once process types
|
By
James Bayer
·
#203
·
|
|
Re: scheduler
To complete my request, I'm thinking of something like this in the
manifest.yml:
applications:
- name: virusscan
memory: 512M
instances: 1
*schedule: - startFrom : a date
To complete my request, I'm thinking of something like this in the
manifest.yml:
applications:
- name: virusscan
memory: 512M
instances: 1
*schedule: - startFrom : a date
|
By
Corentin Dupont <cdupont@...>
·
#202
·
|
|
scheduler
Hi guys,
just to know, is there a project to add a job scheduler in Cloud Foundry?
I'm thinking of something like the Heroku scheduler (
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/scheduler).
That would be
Hi guys,
just to know, is there a project to add a job scheduler in Cloud Foundry?
I'm thinking of something like the Heroku scheduler (
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/scheduler).
That would be
|
By
Corentin Dupont <corentin.dupont@...>
·
#201
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
ok thanks for the extra detail.
to confirm, during the load test, the http traffic is being routed through
zones 4 and 5 app instances on DEAs in a balanced way. however the dopplers
associated with
ok thanks for the extra detail.
to confirm, during the load test, the http traffic is being routed through
zones 4 and 5 app instances on DEAs in a balanced way. however the dopplers
associated with
|
By
James Bayer
·
#200
·
|
|
Re: Doppler zoning query
I am seeing logs from zone 4 and 5 when tailing the logs (*cf logs
hello-world | grep App | awk '{ print $2 }'*), I see a relatively even
balance between all app instances, yet doppler on zones 1-3
I am seeing logs from zone 4 and 5 when tailing the logs (*cf logs
hello-world | grep App | awk '{ print $2 }'*), I see a relatively even
balance between all app instances, yet doppler on zones 1-3
|
By
john mcteague <john.mcteague@...>
·
#199
·
|
|
Re: Question about services on Cloud Foundry
it simply means that there is a Service Broker, and works in conjunction
with the "marketplace" so commands like "cf marketplace", "cf
create-service", "cf bind-service" and related all work with the
it simply means that there is a Service Broker, and works in conjunction
with the "marketplace" so commands like "cf marketplace", "cf
create-service", "cf bind-service" and related all work with the
|
By
James Bayer
·
#198
·
|
|
Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Hi,
When I run 'bosh deploy' , I got a error''Error 400007: `uaa_z1/0' is not
running after update":
*Started preparing configuration > Binding configuration. Done (00:00:04)*
*Started updating
Hi,
When I run 'bosh deploy' , I got a error''Error 400007: `uaa_z1/0' is not
running after update":
*Started preparing configuration > Binding configuration. Done (00:00:04)*
*Started updating
|
By
Frank Li <alivedata@...>
·
#210
·
|
|
Re: Release Notes for v210
CVE-2015-3202 details:
http://lists.cloudfoundry.org/pipermail/cf-dev/2015-May/000194.html
CVE-2015-1834 details:
http://lists.cloudfoundry.org/pipermail/cf-dev/2015-May/000195.html
--
Thank
CVE-2015-3202 details:
http://lists.cloudfoundry.org/pipermail/cf-dev/2015-May/000194.html
CVE-2015-1834 details:
http://lists.cloudfoundry.org/pipermail/cf-dev/2015-May/000195.html
--
Thank
|
By
James Bayer
·
#197
·
|