We have a cf app that need not have public visibility. It's like a service, but it's a stateless app, so making it a droplet is convenient. It only needs to be visible to the other apps. How can I

After some more digging I found that it seems to be a problem in https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng/blob/master/app/controllers/runtime/buildpack_bits_controller.rb#L21 . The 'params'

Hi James Thanks for the info. I and my team greatly appreciate your time here. I believe we are running on v153 (or close to that), which is very old. I will have a look at those components more

once you get to this line where you make the app started [1], then the next step is that the cloud controller should be sending a NATS message targeted at a particular DEA selected to run the app. so

a file into an instance, that instance will be restarted. How does it monitor the behavior? Is there a list of commands whitelisted? I am curious because I am trying to find out what the whitelist

looking at the public tracker for diego, you can track as the team approaches this important release marker [1] named "Diego can replace DEAs". pivotal is using diego in our hosted production envs

Yes, though in your "https only" example the route service broker would be the one to interpret how to implement the attribute or service bound to the route and choose to either provide a proxy or

Hi. We are running on an extremely old version of CF (we are in the process of building one based on the latest), so I know there is very little the community may be able to help. But regardless...

Here's a gist of the output I get and the command I run: https://gist.github.com/MrEnzyme/7ebd45c9c34151a52050 wrote:

Thank James and Shannon for your answer, The support for the Arbitrary Parameters feature is actually a great improvement for service broker. I'm really wish to test it soon. Now when i'm

Hi Mike, I think I understand your use case. Currently route services are specced out such that they must, at minimum, function like a proxy. I think you're proposing that a route service could be a

I think with the CLI we could add clarifying messaging when using ssh what the current policy around recycling is. Eric, what do you think about calling it the "recycling" policy, enabled by default?

Hi, We're going to use diego in production. Could you please give the date of the first formal release? Thanks.

i think i understand what you mean now. shannon has thought through those concepts and relationships and the options for how to express them. i'll let him comment on his current thinking. i got hung

It should work since our acceptance tests validate this on every build we cut [1]. Are you running the operation as someone with a cc admin scope? If you want to create a gist with the log (with

Depends on your role and where your app is in the deployment pipeline. Most of the scenarios I envisioned were for the tail end of development where you need to poke around to debug and figure out

I would rather that scp would throw an error than having it copy the file and then immediately kill the instance. I still don't understand how that would ever be useful. Or would having a

On behalf of many customers that I have spoken to, the default behavior of disposing of any container that could be tainted is the right choice. Not providing rope is a huge feature of the platform.

I'm having an issue where I can't upload any buildpack to cloudfoundry; it says "The buildpack upload is invalid: a filename must be specified" and the cf_trace confirms it's sending a null value for

Hello, A commit to increment the broker API version header went out by mistake. We are currently backfilling docs for 2.5 (should be published very