Thanks Onsi. Being able to use FUSE is quite important to us too. Can you clarify the security risk associated with running a privileged container (as a workaround for the lack of fuse support within

Eric, The CAB minutes [1] mentionned you were still looking for feedback from the community on the policy for altered instances, but this thread seems silent for a while. Not sure you had seen my

Thanks Mike, this is now in the wiki https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-docs-contrib/wiki Guillaume.

Thanks again to Phil Whelan for crafting the greatly detailed cab minutes. http://www.activestate.com/blog/2015/07/cloud-foundry-advisory-board-meeting-2015-july The MEGA section says the

Sorry all, The correct URL for LicenseFinder tracker is: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/234851 However, the Toolsmiths tracker is private as there's quite a bit of work in there that's

Mike, not sure you had seen my question to the utilities pointers below ?

Hi, I wonder if there are plans to implement an auto-sleep behavior in cloudfoundry, in which inactive apps would be automatically stopped after a max inactivity threshold, and automatically restart

Thanks Shannon for your feedback. I understand there is a small window into which the pre-determined app might not exist anymore (e.g. during blue/green deployment traffic shift). The default

Hello, Maxim. I am Alexander Lomov. I work in R&D department at Altoros. I would like to participate in your Hangout meeting dedicated to CF Abacus. Could you please tell when and how I can

Hi, there I noticed there are three state about the app event, started, stopped and buildpack_set. what does "buildpack_set" mean? If the app is in buildpack_set status, does it occupy

+1 for space-level configuration. Jack

Sai, Running free/top from inside the container is going to report the VM's memory/cpu statistics in which the container is running. The correct stats are located in the appropriate cgroups

We have several use cases - in time event processing for usage, with notification instead of polling we'll be able to keep up better, getting closer to real time for metering, and thus rating and

I don't see anything on Twitter about this. Any objections to tweeting this news? Is there a potential blog post for the CF blog here? Best, Stormy wrote:

Quick update on inception meeting. To accommodate our friends and colleagues from Europe who would like to attend, let's plan to move the meeting to 10a to 12:30p with the option of lunch after at

the way down to app developers increases the cognitive load for folks using the platform. Enabling/disabling it on a per-installation level, and - maybe - a per-space level, might be a decent

Hi Pramod, Still TBD - we're driving hard for a Diego GA first and will then evaluate the various priorities and scope them out. Onsi wrote:

That's still very much open for discussion. Obviously, someone with administrative privileges should be in charge of this particular piece of configuration. Also making this a runtime config (e.g.

Hey Colin, Good stuff. I like to draw a circle around the rootfs, the buildpacks, the generated droplet, the Task/LRP recipes, and the lifecycle binaries that run inside containers to stage and

If not FUSE, what is the timeline/status for support of mounting persistent volumes in Diego natively(remember seeing a talk in cf summit on floating/fixed volumes)? Pramod wrote: