|
Re: Removing support for v1 service brokers
We've found NATS to be unstable under certain conditions, temporary network
interruptions or network instability, around the client reconnection logic.
We've seen that it could take anywhere from a
We've found NATS to be unstable under certain conditions, temporary network
interruptions or network instability, around the client reconnection logic.
We've seen that it could take anywhere from a
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#1923
·
|
|
Re: Error 400007: `stats_z1/0' is not running after update
It frequently logs the message below. It seems not
It frequently logs the message below. It seems not
|
By
iamflying
·
#1922
·
|
|
Re: Error 400007: `stats_z1/0' is not running after update
Please check the file collector/collector.log, it's in a subdirectory of
the unpacked log tarball.
wrote:
Please check the file collector/collector.log, it's in a subdirectory of
the unpacked log tarball.
wrote:
|
By
Amit Kumar Gupta
·
#1921
·
|
|
Re: Error 400007: `stats_z1/0' is not running after update
Actually, I checked the two files in status_z1 job VM. I did not find any
clues. Attached for reference.
Actually, I checked the two files in status_z1 job VM. I did not find any
clues. Attached for reference.
|
By
iamflying
·
#1920
·
|
|
Re: Error 400007: `stats_z1/0' is not running after update
If you do "bosh logs stats_z1 0 --job" you will get a tarball of all the
logs for the relevant processes running on the stats_z1/0 VM. You will
likely find some error messages in the collectors
If you do "bosh logs stats_z1 0 --job" you will get a tarball of all the
logs for the relevant processes running on the stats_z1/0 VM. You will
likely find some error messages in the collectors
|
By
Amit Kumar Gupta
·
#1919
·
|
|
Re: Introducing CF-Swagger
Thanks Mohamed and Max for sharing this great work. Besides the supporting
an official TCK, the cf-swagger repo seems great to ease the delivery of
acceptance tests as part of a a service broker
Thanks Mohamed and Max for sharing this great work. Besides the supporting
an official TCK, the cf-swagger repo seems great to ease the delivery of
acceptance tests as part of a a service broker
|
By
Guillaume Berche
·
#1918
·
|
|
Re: Error 400007: `stats_z1/0' is not running after update
It does not help.
I always see the "collector" process bouncing between "running" and "does
not exit" when I use "monit summary" in a while loop.
Who knows how to get the real error when the
It does not help.
I always see the "collector" process bouncing between "running" and "does
not exit" when I use "monit summary" in a while loop.
Who knows how to get the real error when the
|
By
iamflying
·
#1917
·
|
|
Re: Error 400007: `stats_z1/0' is not running after update
My approach is to login on the stats vm and sudo, then
run "monit status" and restart the failed processes or simply restart all
processes by running "monit restart all"
wait for a while(5~10 minutes
My approach is to login on the stats vm and sudo, then
run "monit status" and restart the failed processes or simply restart all
processes by running "monit restart all"
wait for a while(5~10 minutes
|
By
Tony
·
#1916
·
|
|
Error 400007: `stats_z1/0' is not running after update
Hi all,
I am installing cf 212 with stemcell 2989. However, I got the failure on
status_z1.
Started preparing configuration > Binding configuration. Done (00:00:04)
Started updating job
Hi all,
I am installing cf 212 with stemcell 2989. However, I got the failure on
status_z1.
Started preparing configuration > Binding configuration. Done (00:00:04)
Started updating job
|
By
iamflying
·
#1915
·
|
|
Re: Removing support for v1 service brokers
Thanks for the announcement.
To be clear is this announcement to cease support for the old v1 brokers or
is this to eliminate support for the v1 api in the CC? Does the v1 CC code
depend on NATS?
Thanks for the announcement.
To be clear is this announcement to cease support for the old v1 brokers or
is this to eliminate support for the v1 api in the CC? Does the v1 CC code
depend on NATS?
|
By
Mike Youngstrom
·
#1914
·
|
|
Re: F5 Load Balancer Configuration for Cloud Foundry Loggregator
If you are sharing a vip for http and websocket then 443 would be correct.
But Anthony, you can try creating a layer 4 virtual server on 4443 that
goes to the same pool on the back end and configure
If you are sharing a vip for http and websocket then 443 would be correct.
But Anthony, you can try creating a layer 4 virtual server on 4443 that
goes to the same pool on the back end and configure
|
By
Mike Youngstrom
·
#1913
·
|
|
Re: F5 Load Balancer Configuration for Cloud Foundry Loggregator
Are you sure your logregator endpoint is configured on 443 and not 4443?
Are you sure your logregator endpoint is configured on 443 and not 4443?
|
By
Johannes Hiemer <jvhiemer@...>
·
#1912
·
|
|
Re: F5 Load Balancer Configuration for Cloud Foundry Loggregator
Yep. --recent works. Other cf commands and cf curl also works.
It definitely is the websockets for loggregator. Just not sure what the right config for F5 (version 10.4) should
Yep. --recent works. Other cf commands and cf curl also works.
It definitely is the websockets for loggregator. Just not sure what the right config for F5 (version 10.4) should
|
By
Anthony
·
#1911
·
|
|
Re: F5 Load Balancer Configuration for Cloud Foundry Loggregator
Does `cf logs --recent` work for you? The recent logs request goes over
HTTP. If that goes through that means only the websocket requests to
loggregator servers are a problem.
Rohit
Does `cf logs --recent` work for you? The recent logs request goes over
HTTP. If that goes through that means only the websocket requests to
loggregator servers are a problem.
Rohit
|
By
Rohit Kumar
·
#1910
·
|
|
Re: DEA/Warden staging error
Based on your description, it doesn't sound like warden networking or the
warden iptables chains are your problem. Are you able to share all of your
routes and chains via a gist?
route -n
ifconfig
Based on your description, it doesn't sound like warden networking or the
warden iptables chains are your problem. Are you able to share all of your
routes and chains via a gist?
route -n
ifconfig
|
By
Matthew Sykes <matthew.sykes@...>
·
#1909
·
|
|
Re: F5 Load Balancer Configuration for Cloud Foundry Loggregator
Thanks Mike! Unfortunately, upgrading is not an option since its a really loaded enterprise device. The interesting part is that there is a similarly set up websockets vip (plain old server i think
Thanks Mike! Unfortunately, upgrading is not an option since its a really loaded enterprise device. The interesting part is that there is a similarly set up websockets vip (plain old server i think
|
By
Anthony
·
#1908
·
|
|
join
--
Thanks & Best Regards,
chunhua, zhang(张春华)
M: +86 187 5198 6615
Department: CONSULTING
Manager: Leon Cheng
IT issue? Mail to: ask(a)pivotal.io
--
Thanks & Best Regards,
chunhua, zhang(张春华)
M: +86 187 5198 6615
Department: CONSULTING
Manager: Leon Cheng
IT issue? Mail to: ask(a)pivotal.io
|
By
Chunhua Zhang <chzhang@...>
·
#1907
·
|
|
Re: Packaging CF app as bosh-release
Great. Let us know if you have further questions, or share if you end up
getting something cool deployed and working, since I haven't seen Spark on
BOSH or CF yet.
Best,
Amit
Great. Let us know if you have further questions, or share if you end up
getting something cool deployed and working, since I haven't seen Spark on
BOSH or CF yet.
Best,
Amit
|
By
Amit Kumar Gupta
·
#1906
·
|
|
Re: Removing support for v1 service brokers
I'm curious about the reasoning for the migration out of NATS, there was
any limitation you guys hit?
I'm curious about the reasoning for the migration out of NATS, there was
any limitation you guys hit?
|
By
Camilo Aguilar
·
#1905
·
|
|
Re: F5 Load Balancer Configuration for Cloud Foundry Loggregator
We are running 11.4 and 11.6. I'd give an upgrade a try before digging too
much deeper.
Mike
We are running 11.4 and 11.6. I'd give an upgrade a try before digging too
much deeper.
Mike
|
By
Mike Youngstrom
·
#1904
·
|