cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org

Re: Support for HTTP/2

Shannon, in our design we have a reverse proxy colocated with the gorouter. [1] While we can clearly reencrypt data going over loopback TCP (or Unix sockets :D) to the gorouter... it sounds a little

By Carlo Alberto Ferraris · #3659 ·

Re: [abacus] Handling Notifications

Hi Chaskin, Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I'll try to address some of your questions: which of the types of content based filtering are required to express what we need while maintaining a

By Jean-Sebastien Delfino · #3658 ·

Re: Support for HTTP/2

Hi Carlo, Thank you for letting us know, I wasn't aware of this. With this limitation in mind, an upstream component could still terminate TLS, but couldn't Gorouter also? Although I recognize the

By Shannon Coen · #3657 ·

Re: Diego IAAS settings for vsphere

Hi, Daya, Thanks very much for the additional logs. Those BBS errors look normal (requests often bounce off nonexistent records), and from the auctioneer logs the auction process is retrieving state

By Eric Malm <emalm@...> · #3656 ·

Re: Support for HTTP/2

Just my two cents: right now HTTP/2 support in Go 1.6 does not include support for h2c (HTTP/2 over TCP) [1]. It only supports h2 (HTTP/2 over TLS). So basically SSL termination before the gorouter

By Carlo Alberto Ferraris · #3655 ·

Bosh-Lite Changes

As part of the effort to convert from using NFS to WebDAV as the default blobstore in cf-release, we have made that change for bosh-lite. If you deploy a new cf-release to bosh-lite against an

By Zach Robinson · #3654 ·

Re: Issue with crashing Windows apps on Diego

My concern is that the HTTP check (mislabeled as "port") would still be the default and I'd have to expect users to opt out of it per app. It's confusing and not what users of the platform have come

By Aaron Huber · #3653 ·

CF Release 227 & UAA Spec Changes

Hi All, Starting cf-release V227, UAA is being consumed as a separate bosh release as opposed to a job. The release notes published earlier was not covering the details of all the spec changes that

By Sree Tummidi · #3652 ·

Re: about flow control for app

Hi, The Routing team has the Route Services work in progress [1]. I believe once that work is complete you could develop a route service to be able to do this type of rate limiting. Shannon may be

By Dieu Cao <dcao@...> · #3651 ·

Re: Issue with crashing Windows apps on Diego

wrote: Setting the health check to none does not actually disable health checks. This setting simply disables the HTTP healthcheck, and Diego will continue to monitor the process. I'm not sure why

By Matthew Horan · #3650 ·

Re: - CC configuration in deployment manifest

Thanks a lot Dieu, that answers my question. I have another question about creating a deployment manifest using the following as guidelines:

By Kinjal Doshi · #3649 ·

Re: PR for allowing gem repo configuration in Ruby buildpack

Hey Jack, Thanks for putting the putting the pull request in. We'll review it shortly and get back to you on the thread.

By Danny Rosen · #3648 ·

Re: - CC configuration in deployment manifest

Hi Kinjal, We generally recommend naming it with a specific identifiable folder name that is not the bucket root. This might look like: ... buildpack_directory_key:

By Dieu Cao <dcao@...> · #3647 ·

Re: PR for allowing gem repo configuration in Ruby buildpack

Yes that should work too, but it's still nice to be able to install the gems during staging. Jack

By Jack Cai · #3646 ·

Re: PR for allowing gem repo configuration in Ruby buildpack

Could using a custom gem mirror be achieved by caching the dependencies before push? Operating in a "airgapped" or "Disconnected environment" and operating in a "whitelist firewall environment" often

By Evan Farrar <evanfarrar@...> · #3645 ·

PR for allowing gem repo configuration in Ruby buildpack

Can someone merge this PR: [1]? It provides useful features to allow operators to set a global gem repo mirror (via environment variable group) where the default repo is slow to reach.

By Jack Cai · #3644 ·

Re: Need help for diego deployment

Sorry, for the typo I meant 6868 Thanks, Kinjal

By Kinjal Doshi · #3643 ·

Re: How does an application know it's running in DIEGO?

Thanks for all the replies. I think I've got what need. Jack

By Jack Cai · #3642 ·

Re: Need help for diego deployment

Hi Amit, This does not seem to be a port issue on 6968. I tried the same deployment by modifying the security groups (both bosh and cf ) to allow All Protocol All Ports. even wit this change the

By Kinjal Doshi · #3640 ·

Re: Issue with crashing Windows apps on Diego

Just to clarify as well why I think this is so important - a majority of apps on our internal platforms require authentication and will return a 401 on the root page, making them unusable on Diego for

By Aaron Huber · #3641 ·

Messages