Hi, You can check the the App Usage Events API [1]. They are discarded after some time (default: a month), so you should move the info to a dedicated DB if you need audit events. Regards, Hristo

Amishi, Please give us more information about your question. 1. What is "the memory settings in the java buildpack"? 2. What is "memory sizes"? 3. What did you do with changing "memory sizes",

Hi guys, I would like to know if there is a log somewhere containing the number of apps in CF (result of cf apps)? Or a log of the scale up/down commands? I need to make an analysis of all the scaling

Hi Dies, Have your thoughts on this moved on any since you posted this. We would be really interested to see this in the OSS release Thanks Darren

Hi, I am trying to deploy my app on cloudfoundry using a custom offline buildpack. Buildpack creation goes fine but when I push an app referring that buildpack application fails to stage at

You are correct. PWS is a shared platform and so user account do not and cannot obtain admin privileges. If you have any additional questions, please email support(a)run.pivotal.io as this forum is

Hey Stanley, Looks like you have a zombie (Z) process with 99.9% CPU shares, which sounds like this

Thanks! The documentation seems to imply that this can only be done if you have a spring application. Is this true? “Cloud Foundry provides extensive support for connecting a Spring application to

It will totally depend on the app/buildpack. For example, the static file buildpack and PHP buildpack just launch Nginx and then host the application inside it. As soon as the web server is up it

My understanding is that because the app droplet itself typically includes the webserver (as opposed to Windows where the server is run by the host), it would be rare for the web server to be

Thank you. In that case, I am running the 60 days trial version of Pivotal.io. So I have no administrator as I suppose. Can I set my account to get admin privileges or can I set me as an admin?

I understand what you're trying to avoid, I just think that is actually the normal case for the port healthchecks. Nothing on the Linux or Docker side ever touches the app so it's entirely possible

Thanks! The documentation seems to imply that this can only be done if you have a spring application. Is this true? "Cloud Foundry provides extensive support for connecting a Spring application to

Thanks! The documentation seems to imply that this can only be done if you have a spring application. Is this true? "Cloud Foundry provides extensive support for connecting a Spring application to

Hi Kinjal, Sorry for the delayed response. Are you still hitting compilation timeouts? I cannot access the gist you linked to with the debug output of your failed BOSH task. Amit

Hi Kinjal, You are mixing the minimal deployment instructions with the "standard" deployment instructions. When using the "standard" instructions (where you create a stub), both cf1 and cf2 networks

Hi Aaron, You can track the progress of the story for DiegoWindows here on the public tracker [1]. As it stands, we don't yet have a solution that we could do within the DiegoWindows codebase that

Based on this discussion, where are we on the priority of switching the current "port" check for the Windows lifecycle back to actually be a port check? I get the impression that the changes to

Quick reminder of the CAB call this Wednesday, February 10th @ 8a PDT. All info in

wrote: The administrator for the CF installation you're targeting has disabled docker support. Since you're not an administrator, you cannot turn on this feature. Talk to your administrator and