|
Re: cf scale command sequence
Thanks. What I am concerned about are the inflight transactions on the
container when it is being destroyed. What happens to them? If the routes
are removed from the GoRouter before the container is
Thanks. What I am concerned about are the inflight transactions on the
container when it is being destroyed. What happens to them? If the routes
are removed from the GoRouter before the container is
|
By
Siva Balan <mailsiva@...>
·
#4799
·
|
|
Re: VCAP_APPLICATION in the V3 Cloud Foundry API
Thanks for all your input. Upon seeing how the buildpacks use VCAP_APPLICATION, I’m thinking we want to leave it as is and potentially add a few new top level environment
Thanks for all your input. Upon seeing how the buildpacks use VCAP_APPLICATION, I’m thinking we want to leave it as is and potentially add a few new top level environment
|
By
Nicholas Calugar
·
#4798
·
|
|
Re: cf scale command sequence
It is pretty much a race. It can happen either way. GoRouter will retry
on failed connects so if the route remains when the container is
removed, the next instance will be tried.
- Michael
It is pretty much a race. It can happen either way. GoRouter will retry
on failed connects so if the route remains when the container is
removed, the next instance will be tried.
- Michael
|
By
Michael Fraenkel <michael.fraenkel@...>
·
#4797
·
|
|
cf scale command sequence
When I issue a cf scale command to bring down the number of app instances
from, say 10 to 5, what is the sequence of events that take place to make
this happen? I am particularly interested to know if
When I issue a cf scale command to bring down the number of app instances
from, say 10 to 5, what is the sequence of events that take place to make
this happen? I am particularly interested to know if
|
By
Siva Balan <mailsiva@...>
·
#4796
·
|
|
Cloud Controller jobs no longer using properties.domains
Heads up, y'all:
To reduce confusion about manifest properties `domain` and `system_domain`,
CAPI is working with Release Integration to consolidate the two under the
property `system_domain`. As
Heads up, y'all:
To reduce confusion about manifest properties `domain` and `system_domain`,
CAPI is working with Release Integration to consolidate the two under the
property `system_domain`. As
|
By
Utako Ueda
·
#4795
·
|
|
In Diego (maybe DEA also) why is $HOME /home/vcap/app and not /home/vcap?
This burned me today because I was attempting to put fonts into the home
directory identified by the java system property "user.home" (which is
/home/vcap) instead of the environment variable $HOME
This burned me today because I was attempting to put fonts into the home
directory identified by the java system property "user.home" (which is
/home/vcap) instead of the environment variable $HOME
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#4794
·
|
|
Looking to do user interviews with larger OSS installations, focusing on logging and metrics
Hi cf-dev,
I'm the product manager for Loggregator. I'm looking for users on the
larger side to interview about your experiences, needs and wants for
logging and metrics in Cloud Foundry. I can also
Hi cf-dev,
I'm the product manager for Loggregator. I'm looking for users on the
larger side to interview about your experiences, needs and wants for
logging and metrics in Cloud Foundry. I can also
|
By
Jim CF Campbell
·
#4793
·
|
|
Re: My nodejs application can't work if the version nodejs buildpack >= v1.5.9
Glad to here you got your app to deploy. Any idea why you had to update the
version of npm ? Did you see anything in the changelog that is interesting ?
Glad to here you got your app to deploy. Any idea why you had to update the
version of npm ? Did you see anything in the changelog that is interesting ?
|
By
John Shahid
·
#4792
·
|
|
Re: My nodejs application can't work if the version nodejs buildpack >= v1.5.9
Have resolved this issue, the solution is change the npm version of package.json from ~2.11.3 to ~2.15.0 .
Change
```
, "engines" : {
"node" : "~0.12.7",
"npm" : "~2.11.3"
Have resolved this issue, the solution is change the npm version of package.json from ~2.11.3 to ~2.15.0 .
Change
```
, "engines" : {
"node" : "~0.12.7",
"npm" : "~2.11.3"
|
By
Sam Dai
·
#4791
·
|
|
Re: How to create/start an APP in quickest way
Correct. There's a couple ways you can create the target app. Push a
dummy app or use the API directly (i.e. `cf curl` [1]). Once you create
the target app, copy source will override whatever is in
Correct. There's a couple ways you can create the target app. Push a
dummy app or use the API directly (i.e. `cf curl` [1]). Once you create
the target app, copy source will override whatever is in
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4790
·
|
|
Re: How to create/start an APP in quickest way
yes, I looked at "copy-source".
copy-source - Make a copy of app source code from one application to another. Unless overridden, the copy-source command will restart the application.
cf copy-source
yes, I looked at "copy-source".
copy-source - Make a copy of app source code from one application to another. Unless overridden, the copy-source command will restart the application.
cf copy-source
|
By
Stanley Shen <meteorping@...>
·
#4789
·
|
|
Re: How to create/start an APP in quickest way
Have you looked at `cf copy-source`? You can use that to copy one app to
another. You could then change service bindings, environment variables and
scale the copy of the app separately. I believe
Have you looked at `cf copy-source`? You can use that to copy one app to
another. You could then change service bindings, environment variables and
scale the copy of the app separately. I believe
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4788
·
|
|
How to create/start an APP in quickest way
Hello, all
As we know, right now if we want to create an APP, we need push it to CF, which will cause us some time.
It needs to download buildpack, upload APP bits etc, it may takes several
Hello, all
As we know, right now if we want to create an APP, we need push it to CF, which will cause us some time.
It needs to download buildpack, upload APP bits etc, it may takes several
|
By
Stanley Shen <meteorping@...>
·
#4787
·
|
|
Re: push APP using docker image
LGTM, but i'm using private docker registry, same docker image download
from docker hub
+-----------------+-----------+-------------+
| Name | Versions | Commit Hash
LGTM, but i'm using private docker registry, same docker image download
from docker hub
+-----------------+-----------+-------------+
| Name | Versions | Commit Hash
|
By
Yitao Jiang
·
#4786
·
|
|
push APP using docker image
Hello, all
I am trying on to push APP using docker image.
From an existed thead, As Eric said we can use "cf push diego-docker-app -o cloudfoundry/diego-docker-app"
But I got errors when running it,
Hello, all
I am trying on to push APP using docker image.
From an existed thead, As Eric said we can use "cf push diego-docker-app -o cloudfoundry/diego-docker-app"
But I got errors when running it,
|
By
Stanley Shen <meteorping@...>
·
#4785
·
|
|
May CAB call next Wednesday May 11, 2016 @ 8a PDT
Hi, all,
Quick reminder of the CAB call next Wednesday, May 11th @ 8a PDT. All info in
Hi, all,
Quick reminder of the CAB call next Wednesday, May 11th @ 8a PDT. All info in
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#4784
·
|
|
Re: aligning cf push health-check default value
Hi Dies,
IMO the healthcheck of the app should be determined independently of
whether a developer wants their app routable.
My understanding of the implications for you proposal are that a
Hi Dies,
IMO the healthcheck of the app should be determined independently of
whether a developer wants their app routable.
My understanding of the implications for you proposal are that a
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#4783
·
|
|
Re: aligning cf push health-check default value
Hi Dies,
I considered this a bit more after we chatted yesterday and I don't think
we should try to create parity between DEAs and Diego in this case. My
personal opinion is that behavior should be
Hi Dies,
I considered this a bit more after we chatted yesterday and I don't think
we should try to create parity between DEAs and Diego in this case. My
personal opinion is that behavior should be
|
By
Nicholas Calugar
·
#4782
·
|
|
CF CLI v6.17.1 Released Today
The CF CLI team just cut 6.17.1. Binaries and link to release notes are available at:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli#downloads
Note that we've been working with the Docs team to publish
The CF CLI team just cut 6.17.1. Binaries and link to release notes are available at:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli#downloads
Note that we've been working with the Docs team to publish
|
By
Koper, Dies <diesk@...>
·
#4781
·
|
|
Re: HTTP request status text is changed
The Java Buildpack creates a very complex command to start applications (since it needs to manage the JVM’s memory space within the container’s memory space). Therefore, it detects standard
The Java Buildpack creates a very complex command to start applications (since it needs to manage the JVM’s memory space within the container’s memory space). Therefore, it detects standard
|
By
Ben Hale <bhale@...>
·
#4780
·
|