In order to debug this, could you provide a sample Dockerfile for an app that demonstrates this behavior, and can you push that sample app to dockerhub? Also, if you're overriding anything like the

I may not have anything that qualifies as compelling. But, here are some of the reasons I've got: * If skipping Xenial that give at the most 1 year to transition from trusty to a 2018.04 based

Thanks for doing that research Eric. So, it appears to be some requirement for Heroku compatibility. So, I guess I have 2 issues I'd like to dig further on that might help other from repeating the

cap(a)hqcquhb1smb:~$ /home/vcap/app/.java-buildpack/open_jdk_jre/bin/jcmd 37 VM.native_memory summary 37: Native Memory Tracking: Total: reserved=2128154KB, committed=836614KB - Java

Try running `jcmd <pid> VM.native_memory summary` to get a full summary of the memory being used by the JVM. Looks like this. ``` $ jcmd 72082 VM.native_memory summary 72082: Native Memory

Hi, We had found that it was due to a mistake in rabbitmq deployment manifest. The administrator user names are not consistent between server and broker. Thank everyone who helped to take a look at

Final reminder. CAB call this Wednesday @ 8a PDT. Best, dr.max ibm cloud labs sillicon valley, ca Sent from my iPhone

I have written up a feature narrative about making admin buildpacks available to meta-buildpacks like the heroku-buildpack-multi, which delegates staging to other buildpacks. The narrative also

Hello, I am running a Java application in Cloud Foundry V3. The manifest indicates 2000Mb of memory. The Java memory parameters (obtained via jcmd) are as follow: -XX:CICompilerCount=3

Hey, Mike, HOME is also `/home/vcap/app` on the DEAs, and Diego has replicated that execution contract for buildpack apps (the buildpack-app-lifecycle's launcher sets HOME to that value before

Hey Mike, Thanks for reaching out. We've discussed supporting Xenial recently but have had trouble identifying compelling reasons to do so. Our current version of the rootfs is supported until April

The Cloud Foundry Foundation would like to better know those that contribute to Cloud Foundry so that we can support this work in the best way possible. If you contribute to Cloud Foundry in any way

Ubuntu Xenial Xerus was released a few weeks ago. Any plans to incorporate Xenial into the platform? Stemcells and/or new root fs? The recent lucid to trusty rootfs fire drill was frustrating to

Thank you Dan for such a wonderful review of my post. The credentials in my post are morphed...so that's taken care :). The application that I am trying is simple Node.js app. Will try out all

Hi shahc, Dan's answer covers most of the details. Cloud Foundry applications are intended to be long-lived (endless until you explicitly stop them) processes that respond to web requests. The

Start running `cf logs` in a second terminal. The log output should show more details about what is happening while the app is starting. Hopefully that will show what is taking up the time. Dan

I am following this blog: https://ragss.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/cloud-foundry-on-openstack/ I have successfully installed bosh, done the ‘bosh upload stemcell and done the ‘bosh upload release

OK, thanks for information, I created a docker image and pushed as an APP. And I can see it's pretty soon in staging process since we had nothing to stage. But the whole process still takes about 3

I believe that is the expected behavior. See the last bullet point here. https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/concepts/docker.html#caveats Dan

Don't be led astray here. With the DEA when an app crashes, you will pretty much always be told "failed to accept connection within health check timeout" (Diego is better and gives more helpful error