|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
Agree on all counts. We've already suggested vendoring the gems inside the buildpack to ensure they're there on the staging container.
I'm now suggesting that the bin scripts just can't find the
Agree on all counts. We've already suggested vendoring the gems inside the buildpack to ensure they're there on the staging container.
I'm now suggesting that the bin scripts just can't find the
|
By
DHR
·
#4973
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
It's not an issue of pointing to the gems. The build pack runs (staging)
in it's own container. The container is completely isolated from the DEA
or Diego Cell where it's running. You can't access
It's not an issue of pointing to the gems. The build pack runs (staging)
in it's own container. The container is completely isolated from the DEA
or Diego Cell where it's running. You can't access
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4972
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
Thanks DHR Team. Yes your correct like the required gem is not available in
staging container stack. but these stacks are pre packaged in cf release.
Not sure how we can do this Gem.path update for
Thanks DHR Team. Yes your correct like the required gem is not available in
staging container stack. but these stacks are pre packaged in cf release.
Not sure how we can do this Gem.path update for
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4971
·
|
|
Re: can we externalize pivotal repository path in java buildpack??
Thanks a lot DHR team.. Let us try out this approach .
Regards
Lingesh M
Thanks a lot DHR team.. Let us try out this approach .
Regards
Lingesh M
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4970
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
So I think your problem is that your gems are on the DEA at staging time but aren't being found by the Ruby layer, right?
If so the normal approach is to point to them via an env Var (eg BUNDLE_PATH,
So I think your problem is that your gems are on the DEA at staging time but aren't being found by the Ruby layer, right?
If so the normal approach is to point to them via an env Var (eg BUNDLE_PATH,
|
By
DHR
·
#4969
·
|
|
Re: can we externalize pivotal repository path in java buildpack??
You could change the config/repository.yml to point to a DNS name on your network. Then build out one or more local repositories on your network using the Java-buildpack-dependency-builder:
You could change the config/repository.yml to point to a DNS name on your network. Then build out one or more local repositories on your network using the Java-buildpack-dependency-builder:
|
By
DHR
·
#4968
·
|
|
can we externalize pivotal repository path in java buildpack??
Hi Cloudfoundry ,
In java-buildpack ,*https://download.run.pivotal.io
<https://download.run.pivotal.io> *URL is used for
default_repository_root for all binaries , but this URL may not be
accessible
Hi Cloudfoundry ,
In java-buildpack ,*https://download.run.pivotal.io
<https://download.run.pivotal.io> *URL is used for
default_repository_root for all binaries , but this URL may not be
accessible
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4967
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
not an issue .Thanks Dan !!!
not an issue .Thanks Dan !!!
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4966
·
|
|
Re: All-In-One Virtual Machine for CF
You can take a look at https://github.com/pivotal-cf/pcfdev.
Thanks
wrote:
You can take a look at https://github.com/pivotal-cf/pcfdev.
Thanks
wrote:
|
By
Gwenn Etourneau
·
#4965
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
OK, my fault. I misunderstood what you're trying to do here. I was
thinking that your application needed the gems, but it's your build pack
that needs them.
You originally said...
because of few
OK, my fault. I misunderstood what you're trying to do here. I was
thinking that your application needed the gems, but it's your build pack
that needs them.
You originally said...
because of few
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4964
·
|
|
All-In-One Virtual Machine for CF
Hi all, sorry in advance of the maybe naif question.
I was wondering if I could find somewhere an all-In-One Virtual Machine with the last version of CF like openshift origin.
thank you in advance
Hi all, sorry in advance of the maybe naif question.
I was wondering if I could find somewhere an all-In-One Virtual Machine with the last version of CF like openshift origin.
thank you in advance
|
By
Francesco D'Andria
·
#4963
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
yes Dan,
we have used below commands to package the buildpack .
bundle install
bundle exec rake package version=custom-java-buildpack
after that we will take the zip and create a offline buildpack
yes Dan,
we have used below commands to package the buildpack .
bundle install
bundle exec rake package version=custom-java-buildpack
after that we will take the zip and create a offline buildpack
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4962
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2016-0781 UAA Password Reset Vulnerability
yes, there has been a typo. Thank you for pointing out !
The correct CVE number is : *CVE-2016-3084*
Thanks,
Sree Tummidi
Sr. Product Manager
Identity - Pivotal Cloud
yes, there has been a typo. Thank you for pointing out !
The correct CVE number is : *CVE-2016-3084*
Thanks,
Sree Tummidi
Sr. Product Manager
Identity - Pivotal Cloud
|
By
Sree Tummidi
·
#4961
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2016-0781 UAA Password Reset Vulnerability
Hi Chip,
I think there might be a typo here as the CVE reference seems to be
the same as for the UAA persistent XSS vulnerability.
G
Hi Chip,
I think there might be a typo here as the CVE reference seems to be
the same as for the UAA persistent XSS vulnerability.
G
|
By
Graham Bleach
·
#4960
·
|
|
CVE-2016-0781 UAA Password Reset Vulnerability
CVE-2016-0781 UAA Password Reset VulnerabilitySeverity
Low
Vendor
Cloud Foundry Foundation
Versions Affected
-
Cloud Foundry release v236 and earlier versions
-
UAA release v3.3.0 and
CVE-2016-0781 UAA Password Reset VulnerabilitySeverity
Low
Vendor
Cloud Foundry Foundation
Versions Affected
-
Cloud Foundry release v236 and earlier versions
-
UAA release v3.3.0 and
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#4959
·
|
|
Re: DEA Monitoring Capabilities
-What information were you trying to understand from mem_used_bytes?
We used mem_used_bytes and mem_free_bytes (currently metrics from bosh) to get an overview over the real overall memory usage of
-What information were you trying to understand from mem_used_bytes?
We used mem_used_bytes and mem_free_bytes (currently metrics from bosh) to get an overview over the real overall memory usage of
|
By
Chawki, Amin <amin.chawki@...>
·
#4958
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
You need to bundle install the gem in the staging container. The build
pack would generally do this.
Dan
lingeshmouleeshwaran(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You need to bundle install the gem in the staging container. The build
pack would generally do this.
Dan
lingeshmouleeshwaran(a)gmail.com> wrote:
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4957
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
Hi Dan ,
yes I have installed the require gem via *bundle install* to specify the
path of vendor staging directories which is available in below paths
/var/vcap/data/packages/dea_next/*
Hi Dan ,
yes I have installed the require gem via *bundle install* to specify the
path of vendor staging directories which is available in below paths
/var/vcap/data/packages/dea_next/*
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4956
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
lingeshmouleeshwaran(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is the way you should be doing it. What about this doesn't help /
work for you?
Dan
lingeshmouleeshwaran(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is the way you should be doing it. What about this doesn't help /
work for you?
Dan
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4955
·
|
|
Re: DEA Monitoring Capabilities
When 234 was released, we did not realize that Collector was creating
additional metrics. Based on reports, we have added back any missing
metrics that people felt were needed. Let me know if we
When 234 was released, we did not realize that Collector was creating
additional metrics. Based on reports, we have added back any missing
metrics that people felt were needed. Let me know if we
|
By
Michael Fraenkel <michael.fraenkel@...>
·
#4954
·
|