Depends what you use Zuul for. If all you need is routing of requests between your microservices, then you don't need Zuul when running them on Cloud Foundry. On CF you give each of your services an

CVE-2016-6638 Credential Vulnerability for Custom Buildpacks Severity Medium Vendor Cloud Foundry Foundation Versions Affected - cf-release versions prior to 241 Description Applications

CVE-2016-6639: PHP Buildpack exposes .profile file Severity Medium Vendor Cloud Foundry Foundation Versions Affected - PHP Buildpack versions prior to v4.3.18 - Cf-release versions

Hi, We are validating the use of Cloud Foundry to deploy our microservice application to the cloud, but I have some doubts. For now we use Spring Cloud Zuul and Consul to route REST calls to our

No objections having been raised, we'll move forward with the incubation process, in cooperation with the IBM team. Thanks, everyone! -mike wrote:

Hi Noburou, The Organizations API documents a status: http://apidocs.cloudfoundry.org/241/organizations/update_an_organization.html It appears this can be “active” or

wrote: It depends. It will download from CC / Blob Store for build packs listed in `cf buildpacks`. If a developer points to a Git repository, then it will pull the build pack from that repository.

​When I am pushing an application it will be downloading the build packs and create a droplets and push the droplet and destroy the build packs, I would like to understand from where it is

When I am pushing an application it will be downloading the build packs and create a droplets and push the droplet and destroy the build packs, I would like to understand from where it is downloading

Hi CF guys, Is there any document / information about the status "suspended" of an org? I've found so many codes about it [1], but cannot find any document in docs.cloudfoundry.org [2]. I want to

Hi, We have prototyped at Orange an automatic mirroring of Pivotal Tracker (PT) stories into github issues. See pivotaltrackermirror at [1], and the experimental mirror of the buildpack tracker at

TL;DR: MySQL implicitly ends transactions before and often after certain statements including DDL statements. Cloud Controller in CF-241 contains a database migration that will not be executed

Mike Quick update, not sure if you are running PostgreSQL or MySQL: The underlying Sequel gem automatically runs migrations in a transaction for RDBMs that support transactions for DDL statements.

Thanks for the update Nicholas. We'll take that into account. Mike wrote:

What is the definition of these next_dea values and are the officially documented somewhere? staging_disk_limit_mb: 6144 staging_memory_limit_mb: 1024 disk_mb: 2048 memory_mb: 1024

Hi Mike, We have just been made aware of a potential problem with the database migration to encrypt an app’s specified buildpack at rest. It was known that it would cause API failures, but we also

Just hasn't been scheduled yet. No known issues at this time. Best Amit

We're about to begin the process of testing and rolling out 241 to our environments and I noticed that PWS still hasn't been upgraded to 241 [0]. Is there a particular issue with 241 causing the delay

Hi, Renaming the app while keeping the route is what the autopilot plugin does: https://github.com/contraband/autopilot James

Hi, I am trying to write a blue green deployment script, during which I'll be renaming my blue app to some other name without doing any change in blue route. Can this cause my application to be