|
Re: SSL termination for private domains
Mike,
thanks for keeping the ball rolling!
For the TLS termination part we are currently using a setup very similar to the one described by Mike. We sit behind a bunch of SLBs that handle termination
Mike,
thanks for keeping the ball rolling!
For the TLS termination part we are currently using a setup very similar to the one described by Mike. We sit behind a bunch of SLBs that handle termination
|
By
Carlo Alberto Ferraris
·
#5741
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Volume Services for Cloud Foundry
Thank you very much.
So much awesomeness.
--
Odeyemi 'Kayode O.
http://ng.linkedin.com/in/kayodeodeyemi. t: @charyorde
Thank you very much.
So much awesomeness.
--
Odeyemi 'Kayode O.
http://ng.linkedin.com/in/kayodeodeyemi. t: @charyorde
|
By
Paul Bakare
·
#5740
·
|
|
Re: SSL termination for private domains
An extension point would be more useful than something that only worked on
the gorouters.
Another thing that mitigates our need for this feature is that most all of
our organization's applications
An extension point would be more useful than something that only worked on
the gorouters.
Another thing that mitigates our need for this feature is that most all of
our organization's applications
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#5739
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Volume Services for Cloud Foundry
Thanks to all who helped contribute and make this happen! This is
fantastic news.
Thanks to all who helped contribute and make this happen! This is
fantastic news.
|
By
Shawn Nielsen
·
#5738
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Volume Services for Cloud Foundry
This is great! Something many of my customers have been wanting for a long
time. Now to figure out how to integrate it with our NetApp NFS.
Mike
This is great! Something many of my customers have been wanting for a long
time. Now to figure out how to integrate it with our NetApp NFS.
Mike
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#5737
·
|
|
Re: SSL termination for private domains
Mike,
What if the way the gorouters were configured with user-provided certs was
a point of extension that could also be used to configure your FLB?
How often do you have to manage certs on your LB?
Mike,
What if the way the gorouters were configured with user-provided certs was
a point of extension that could also be used to configure your FLB?
How often do you have to manage certs on your LB?
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#5736
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Volume Services for Cloud Foundry
+1 ... this is awesome to see released!
Chip Childers
VP Technology, Cloud Foundry Foundation
1.267.250.0815
+1 ... this is awesome to see released!
Chip Childers
VP Technology, Cloud Foundry Foundation
1.267.250.0815
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#5735
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Volume Services for Cloud Foundry
Sweet!!!
By
Amit Kumar Gupta
·
#5734
·
|
|
Announcing Volume Services for Cloud Foundry
As of cf-242
<http://bosh.io/releases/github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release?version=242>
and Service Broker API v2.10, Cloud Foundry now ships with support for *Volume
Services*: filesystem-based data
As of cf-242
<http://bosh.io/releases/github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release?version=242>
and Service Broker API v2.10, Cloud Foundry now ships with support for *Volume
Services*: filesystem-based data
|
By
Ted Young
·
#5733
·
|
|
Re: Do we connect to the CF when we setup using pcfdev
Hi Praveen,
It doesn't matter who looks up anything.local.pcfdev.io. The answer is
always the same address, which is always local: 192.168.11.11. It's a bit
like if the DNS record always returned
Hi Praveen,
It doesn't matter who looks up anything.local.pcfdev.io. The answer is
always the same address, which is always local: 192.168.11.11. It's a bit
like if the DNS record always returned
|
By
Daniel Jones
·
#5732
·
|
|
Re: SSL termination for private domains
For us we handle all ssl termination in our FLB (Frontend Load Balancer).
If a customer adds a custom domain then my team needs to add a vip and
associated cert for that domain. This is something I
For us we handle all ssl termination in our FLB (Frontend Load Balancer).
If a customer adds a custom domain then my team needs to add a vip and
associated cert for that domain. This is something I
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#5731
·
|
|
Repository deprecation notice: github.com/cloudfoundry/buildpack-releases
Hi All,
The CF Buildpacks team recently migrated the BOSH releases for the system
buildpacks from subdirectories of the
github.com/cloudfoundry/buildpack-releases repository to
Hi All,
The CF Buildpacks team recently migrated the BOSH releases for the system
buildpacks from subdirectories of the
github.com/cloudfoundry/buildpack-releases repository to
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#5730
·
|
|
Re: Do we connect to the CF when we setup using pcfdev
Hello Daniel,
if that is the case and if it is going to public DNS how it is resolving to which VM's it has to be , for example I have used the same IP and other 2 members also used the same IP and
Hello Daniel,
if that is the case and if it is going to public DNS how it is resolving to which VM's it has to be , for example I have used the same IP and other 2 members also used the same IP and
|
By
Praveen sadineni
·
#5729
·
|
|
Re: Do we connect to the CF when we setup using pcfdev
Hi Daniel,
I've prioritized a story to investigate your StackExchange issue. We'll
update the documentation with any findings.
Praveen, are you also running OS X? Can you open a PCF Dev Github
Hi Daniel,
I've prioritized a story to investigate your StackExchange issue. We'll
update the documentation with any findings.
Praveen, are you also running OS X? Can you open a PCF Dev Github
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#5728
·
|
|
Re: Do we connect to the CF when we setup using pcfdev
Hi Praveen,
The name records for *.local.pcfdev.io always refer back to the same
(local) IP: 192.168.11.11. So you make a call out to the public internet to
resolve the DNS record, but then requests
Hi Praveen,
The name records for *.local.pcfdev.io always refer back to the same
(local) IP: 192.168.11.11. So you make a call out to the public internet to
resolve the DNS record, but then requests
|
By
Daniel Jones
·
#5727
·
|
|
Re: Do we connect to the CF when we setup using pcfdev
How is it resolving the DNS when we have PCF dev locally?
When we connect to https://local.pcfdev.io it basically redirects to console.local.pcfdev.io and again redirecting to uaa.local.pcfdev.io ,
How is it resolving the DNS when we have PCF dev locally?
When we connect to https://local.pcfdev.io it basically redirects to console.local.pcfdev.io and again redirecting to uaa.local.pcfdev.io ,
|
By
Praveen sadineni
·
#5726
·
|
|
Re: Do we connect to the CF when we setup using pcfdev
Hi Praveen,
PCF Dev does not connect to a separate PCF or CF installation. PCF Dev can
be administered using the cf CLI (by following the instructions at boot) or
using Apps Manager (by opening a
Hi Praveen,
PCF Dev does not connect to a separate PCF or CF installation. PCF Dev can
be administered using the cf CLI (by following the instructions at boot) or
using Apps Manager (by opening a
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#5725
·
|
|
Do we connect to the CF when we setup using pcfdev
Hello ,
I have a PCFdev setup and when evr we deploy an application or do any administration of PCFdev where do we connect ,
Is it that all locally we do this or do we connect to PCF ,
Secondly if
Hello ,
I have a PCFdev setup and when evr we deploy an application or do any administration of PCFdev where do we connect ,
Is it that all locally we do this or do we connect to PCF ,
Secondly if
|
By
Praveen sadineni
·
#5724
·
|
|
Re: Announcement: default etcd cluster to TLS in cf-release spiff templates
Hello all,
It’s been a couple of days that we are struggling on the update of CF v240 to v241 together with the TLS upgrade for etcd.
We are following the guide provided but we always get random
Hello all,
It’s been a couple of days that we are struggling on the update of CF v240 to v241 together with the TLS upgrade for etcd.
We are following the guide provided but we always get random
|
By
Grifalconi, Michael <michael.grifalconi@...>
·
#5723
·
|
|
Re: SSL termination for private domains
Some time ago I sketched out an epic to add support for multiple certs to
gorouter, configured via BOSH manifest property, but these stories have
languished in the icebox while we've addressed more
Some time ago I sketched out an epic to add support for multiple certs to
gorouter, configured via BOSH manifest property, but these stories have
languished in the icebox while we've addressed more
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#5722
·
|