Hi cf-dev, CF-K8s-Networking-Release v0.3.0 has been cut!Release Highlights Platform Operator can confirm that cf-for-k8s's architecture no longer includes cf-route-sync and metacontroller details,

Can you please move the middle two Ruby client libraries into cf community org instead of the attic; and make me a rubygem owner so I can cut gem releases in future? I am the last maintainer of

Hello! The UAA team has been taking inventory of the projects it maintains. We've decided to end support for a few of those projects: - https://github.com/cloudfoundry/uaa-singular -

Hello CF enthusiasts, The CF-K8s Networking team is hosting office hours today at 10am PDT. Join us if you have any questions, or just if you're curious about the future of Cloud Foundry. Meeting

Hi cf-dev, Routing Release version 0.204.0 is now available for your consuming pleasure! Release Highlights Feature: Change gorouter default branch from “master” to “main”. Fixes gorouter

Hello CF friends, We, the cf-for-k8s RelInt team, are excited to announce the availability of cf-for-k8s 0.5.0 release. The most notable feature is the support for the external database. The feature

Thanks Jonathan. I will take a look at that.

We're ending the call early today on account of low (no) attendance. We'll host again in two weeks! The CFF calendar can be found at https://www.cloudfoundry.org/community-calendar/. Best, Shannon

Just in case this is useful to you, I suggest taking a look at the CF (hence probably also cloud.gov) feature called “Route Services”. Using this platform feature would allow you to deploy a

Thanks Enrique. We are deploying UAA in cloud.gov for our agency and it will be used by applications deployed in cloud.gov for our agency. I can add a nginx proxy in front but I think I should be able

I would expect you place a well hardened reverse proxy in front of your UAA, and that is what you use to control what is exposed to the outside world and what is not? Regards Enrique

We want to deploy UAA for external users of the organization. This UAA deployment would only be used by external users and so some of the URLs would have to be exposed to the internet. But I want a

Hello CF friends, The new major release v6.0.0 of Cloud Foundry acceptance tests (CATS) now works with cf CLI v7. As you may be aware, the cf CLI team recently release the much-awaited v7 CLI that

Assuming that the inputs are the same (same app code, same buildpack) then I would have thought that it's the environment that's different? It might be worth asking on Garden channel in Cloud Foundry

Not that I can see, although we also do frequent "repaves" and we also somewhat recently did an upgrade to a newer version. I'd like to think if it was a Diego cell it would have been destroyed and

Hmm, is there an unhealthy Diego cell in that isolation segment? Regards, Daniel 'Deejay' Jones - CEO +44 (0)79 8000 9153 @DanielJonesEB EngineerBetter Ltd - More than cloud platform specialists

Sorry about that, this would be the log [STG/0] [OUT] **ERROR** Could not validate nginx.conf: Error copying nginx.conf: write

Hey Ross, Given the number of moving parts involved, it’d be really useful to know precisely what you mean by “droplet stage”. A redacted cf push output and cf logs --recent would probably be

Curious, has anyone seen a buildpack with a manifest file work in one segment, but that same app and manifest file not work in an isolation segment? What happens is you run cf push app name, the app

Notice routing-release.0.203.0release includes a fix to a security vulnerability. We recommend you upgrade your deployments immediately. Security: Fix for CVE-2020-15586 Bump golang to version