|
stagingFailed error on .net applicaitons.
After pushing the .net application on window cell. its throwing an
stagingFailed error.
I have check the recent log from cf cli. but its not displaying any information.
But after checking the log
After pushing the .net application on window cell. its throwing an
stagingFailed error.
I have check the recent log from cf cli. but its not displaying any information.
But after checking the log
|
By
ishwar panjari
·
#6492
·
|
|
Re: Cloud Foundry Certified Developer BETA and Early-Access
lol...
I guess it's my own personal baggage from my first job where that's how it
was used. Since you ask, I realize that it's really no longer used that
way. ;-)
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry
lol...
I guess it's my own personal baggage from my first job where that's how it
was used. Since you ask, I realize that it's really no longer used that
way. ;-)
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6491
·
|
|
Re: Cloud Foundry Certified Developer BETA and Early-Access
Hi Chip,
Why do you write "BETA" in all caps? What is the acronym?
If it means beta software, why doesn't Pivotal use conventional
capitalization of the word?
I've been wondering this for a while
Hi Chip,
Why do you write "BETA" in all caps? What is the acronym?
If it means beta software, why doesn't Pivotal use conventional
capitalization of the word?
I've been wondering this for a while
|
By
Jane Day
·
#6490
·
|
|
CF CAB call for March next Wednesday 15th @ 8a PDT
Hi, all,
Please note that the CAB call for March 2017 is next Wednesday, March 15th @ 8a PST [1].
As in last time we will be using Zoom, see agenda [2] for details and CloudFoundry Slack #CAB
Hi, all,
Please note that the CAB call for March 2017 is next Wednesday, March 15th @ 8a PST [1].
As in last time we will be using Zoom, see agenda [2] for details and CloudFoundry Slack #CAB
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#6489
·
|
|
Re: Cloud Foundry Certified Developer BETA and Early-Access
Hi all!
Quick reminder that this signup will be closing on Friday morning US
Eastern time. If you're interested in either the BETA or early access
periods, please be sure to apply
Hi all!
Quick reminder that this signup will be closing on Friday morning US
Eastern time. If you're interested in either the BETA or early access
periods, please be sure to apply
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6488
·
|
|
Re: (Isolation Segments) Question about a Cell with mulitiple "placement_tag"s
Hello Eric-san,
Thank you for the response.
I think I have grasped the current status of the "isolation segments for
compute tier".
Yes, we have been just evaluating it. So there's no actual usage
Hello Eric-san,
Thank you for the response.
I think I have grasped the current status of the "isolation segments for
compute tier".
Yes, we have been just evaluating it. So there's no actual usage
|
By
Noburou TANIGUCHI
·
#6487
·
|
|
Re: (Isolation Segments) Question about a Cell with mulitiple "placement_tag"s
Dear Taniguchi-san,
Thanks very much for asking about isolation segments and the Diego
placement-tag configurations that support them. The current placement-tag
configuration scheme was the simplest
Dear Taniguchi-san,
Thanks very much for asking about isolation segments and the Diego
placement-tag configurations that support them. The current placement-tag
configuration scheme was the simplest
|
By
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
·
#6486
·
|
|
Re: Experimental Loggregator TCP / TLS Configuration Removal
Hi Paolo -
Yes. That is the property. Using this configuration can cause doppler to crash and is now handled by gRPC so you can now get this functionality without setting this property.
Adam
Hi Paolo -
Yes. That is the property. Using this configuration can cause doppler to crash and is now handled by gRPC so you can now get this functionality without setting this property.
Adam
|
By
Adam Hevenor
·
#6485
·
|
|
Re: Experimental Loggregator TCP / TLS Configuration Removal
Hello,
Are you talking about this[1] property?
Thanks
[1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/loggregator/blob/v79/jobs/doppler/spec#L39
Hello,
Are you talking about this[1] property?
Thanks
[1] https://github.com/cloudfoundry/loggregator/blob/v79/jobs/doppler/spec#L39
|
By
Stivanin, Paolo <paolo.stivanin@...>
·
#6484
·
|
|
Re: (Isolation Segments) Question about a Cell with mulitiple "placement_tag"s
Sandy-san,
Thank you for the responses.
The situation has become clear.
I'm glad to hear that a cell will probably be able to belong multiple ISs in
the future.
Sandy Cash Jr wrote
-----
I'm not a
Sandy-san,
Thank you for the responses.
The situation has become clear.
I'm glad to hear that a cell will probably be able to belong multiple ISs in
the future.
Sandy Cash Jr wrote
-----
I'm not a
|
By
Noburou TANIGUCHI
·
#6483
·
|
|
Changes to the CC Clock
Hello all,
As part of bridge consumption, the nsync_bulker job in the cc_bridge is
being eliminated, and its behavior will be migrated into the CC clock. In
preparation for this switchover, the
Hello all,
As part of bridge consumption, the nsync_bulker job in the cc_bridge is
being eliminated, and its behavior will be migrated into the CC clock. In
preparation for this switchover, the
|
By
Timothy Hausler
·
#6482
·
|
|
Re: (Isolation Segments) Question about a Cell with mulitiple "placement_tag"s
Taniguchi-san,
My apologies. I initially got the wrong information regarding how Diego
matches placement tags for desiredLRP placement.
It _is_ the case that a cell can only live in one Isolation
Taniguchi-san,
My apologies. I initially got the wrong information regarding how Diego
matches placement tags for desiredLRP placement.
It _is_ the case that a cell can only live in one Isolation
|
By
Sandy Cash Jr <lhcash@...>
·
#6481
·
|
|
Re: (Isolation Segments) Question about a Cell with mulitiple "placement_tag"s
Hi Taniguchi-san,
I don't know what you mean specifically by "not recognized as a valid
compute resource." Perhaps you could share the manifest snippet?
If you have a cell with two placement tags -
Hi Taniguchi-san,
I don't know what you mean specifically by "not recognized as a valid
compute resource." Perhaps you could share the manifest snippet?
If you have a cell with two placement tags -
|
By
Sandy Cash Jr <lhcash@...>
·
#6480
·
|
|
Experimental Loggregator TCP / TLS Configuration Removal
As of Loggregator v72 secure log delivery is now being handled by gRPC therefore we are removing the experimental configuration of running TCP/TLS between metron and doppler. This was not a
As of Loggregator v72 secure log delivery is now being handled by gRPC therefore we are removing the experimental configuration of running TCP/TLS between metron and doppler. This was not a
|
By
Adam Hevenor
·
#6479
·
|
|
Cloud Foundry Certified Developer BETA and Early-Access
Cloud Foundry Community!
As some of you are aware, the Foundation has been working towards the
launch of a "Cloud Foundry Certified Developer" program. We are excited to
say that the date is getting
Cloud Foundry Community!
As some of you are aware, the Foundation has been working towards the
launch of a "Cloud Foundry Certified Developer" program. We are excited to
say that the date is getting
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6478
·
|
|
(Isolation Segments) Question about a Cell with mulitiple "placement_tag"s
Hi team,
Recently I've been trying Isolation Segments for compute tier.
In the official document, it is required to deploy one or more cells with
`diego.rep.placement_tags` to utilize the isolation
Hi team,
Recently I've been trying Isolation Segments for compute tier.
In the official document, it is required to deploy one or more cells with
`diego.rep.placement_tags` to utilize the isolation
|
By
Noburou TANIGUCHI
·
#6477
·
|
|
Re: A proposal to offer mongodb 3.2.6 bosh release to cloudfoundry
Thanks all ,this is available at https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/mongodb-bosh-release
发自我的 iPhone
在 2017年3月1日,上午1:29,Lin, Lynn
Thanks all ,this is available at https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/mongodb-bosh-release
发自我的 iPhone
在 2017年3月1日,上午1:29,Lin, Lynn
|
By
Lin, Lynn <Lynn.X.Lin@...>
·
#6476
·
|
|
NOTICE: Removing Ruby 2.3.1 and adding Ruby 2.3.3 in cflinuxfs2 stack
Hi All,
The cflinuxfs2 stack currently includes Ruby 2.3.1. New versions of the
stack after April 1, 2017 will include Ruby 2.3.3. This is a
backwards-compatible, patch-level version change, but if
Hi All,
The cflinuxfs2 stack currently includes Ruby 2.3.1. New versions of the
stack after April 1, 2017 will include Ruby 2.3.3. This is a
backwards-compatible, patch-level version change, but if
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#6475
·
|
|
NOTICE: Breaking change in the Python buildpack for all Python 2.7 compiled extension modules
Hi All,
Please note this breaking change in upcoming releases of the Python
buildpack.
Summary:
The next release of the Python buildpack after April 1, 2017 will switch
the unicode mode of all
Hi All,
Please note this breaking change in upcoming releases of the Python
buildpack.
Summary:
The next release of the Python buildpack after April 1, 2017 will switch
the unicode mode of all
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#6474
·
|
|
Re: CF CLI v6.25.0 Released Today
congrats on the new release dies and team. tab completion is a nice touch.
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
congrats on the new release dies and team. tab completion is a nice touch.
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
|
By
James Bayer
·
#6473
·
|