|
Re: BOSH Windows is GA! (& ACTION REQUIRED: End-of-life for Diego MSI)
Amazing! Great work BOSH Windows team!
--
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry Foundation
1.267.250.0815
Amazing! Great work BOSH Windows team!
--
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry Foundation
1.267.250.0815
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6719
·
|
|
BOSH Windows is GA! (& ACTION REQUIRED: End-of-life for Diego MSI)
Hi cf-dev,
This is a very exciting email to write! I'm extremely proud to announce
that BOSH Windows, the new deployment mechanism for Windows cells, is now
generally available!
ACTION REQUIRED:
Hi cf-dev,
This is a very exciting email to write! I'm extremely proud to announce
that BOSH Windows, the new deployment mechanism for Windows cells, is now
generally available!
ACTION REQUIRED:
|
By
Colin Jackson <cojackson@...>
·
#6718
·
|
|
Re: [Proposal] Making the Service Broker API less CF-specific
Hi Gwenn,
We agree that this change is important. However, the Open Service Broker
API Change Policy [1] specifies the following:
New fields may be added to existing request/response messages. These
Hi Gwenn,
We agree that this change is important. However, the Open Service Broker
API Change Policy [1] specifies the following:
New fields may be added to existing request/response messages. These
|
By
Matt McNeeney
·
#6717
·
|
|
Re: [Proposal] Making the Service Broker API less CF-specific
HI,
I think this change is important and need to be done, I like the new
context parameters but not sure about the `optional`, I think it's
important to which env. / platform we are talking
HI,
I think this change is important and need to be done, I like the new
context parameters but not sure about the `optional`, I think it's
important to which env. / platform we are talking
|
By
Gwenn Etourneau
·
#6716
·
|
|
[Proposal] Making the Service Broker API less CF-specific
The Open Service Broker API [1] working group have created a proposal [2]
to make the Service Broker API less CF-specific. The proposed changes will
help grow the services community by allowing
The Open Service Broker API [1] working group have created a proposal [2]
to make the Service Broker API less CF-specific. The proposed changes will
help grow the services community by allowing
|
By
Matt McNeeney
·
#6715
·
|
|
CVE-2017-4973: Privilege Escalation in UAA
CF Devs,
Please see information for the following high UAA CVE. This issue was fixed
in the same releases as CVE-2017-4972 (the blind SQL injection) so if you
already have plans to upgrade, you don't
CF Devs,
Please see information for the following high UAA CVE. This issue was fixed
in the same releases as CVE-2017-4972 (the blind SQL injection) so if you
already have plans to upgrade, you don't
|
By
Molly Crowther
·
#6714
·
|
|
NOTICE: Removal of old .NET Core frameworks and SDKs from the .NET Core buildpack after 2017-05-19
Hi All,
To reduce the size of the .NET Core buildpack and discourage the use of
unsupported versions of .NET Core, we will be removing the following SDK
versions:
1.0.0-preview2-1-003177
As well
Hi All,
To reduce the size of the .NET Core buildpack and discourage the use of
unsupported versions of .NET Core, we will be removing the following SDK
versions:
1.0.0-preview2-1-003177
As well
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#6713
·
|
|
Re: cflinuxfs2 (CF root FS) BOSH release rename
Hi All,
Quick follow-up to this.
To ease the transition, we're going to continue updating the current
cflinuxfs2 BOSH release[1] until May 19, 2017.
After May 19, 2017, only the new BOSH release[2]
Hi All,
Quick follow-up to this.
To ease the transition, we're going to continue updating the current
cflinuxfs2 BOSH release[1] until May 19, 2017.
After May 19, 2017, only the new BOSH release[2]
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#6712
·
|
|
CVE-2017-4972: Blind SQL Injection in UAA
CF devs,
Please see the following public link for information about a high CVE in
UAA.
https://www.cloudfoundry.org/cve-2017-4972/
Friendly reminder that you can subscribe to new Cloud Foundry
CF devs,
Please see the following public link for information about a high CVE in
UAA.
https://www.cloudfoundry.org/cve-2017-4972/
Friendly reminder that you can subscribe to new Cloud Foundry
|
By
Molly Crowther
·
#6711
·
|
|
[IMPORTANT] Reminder - EOL for Legacy DEA Backend on May 22, 2017
Hello All,
I'm excited to send this email as a reminder that EOL for the Legacy DEA
Backend is May 22, 2017, just over a month away, finally closing out a
great chapter for Cloud Foundry.
You can
Hello All,
I'm excited to send this email as a reminder that EOL for the Legacy DEA
Backend is May 22, 2017, just over a month away, finally closing out a
great chapter for Cloud Foundry.
You can
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#6709
·
|
|
Re: cf create-service-auth-token for mongo db returns create-service-auth-token only works up to CF API version 2.46.0. Your target is 2.79.0.
Alex ,
Could you please provide the details about this failure under github issue https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/mongodb-bosh-release/issues ? We can help take a look
Thanks
Lynn
Alex ,
Could you please provide the details about this failure under github issue https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/mongodb-bosh-release/issues ? We can help take a look
Thanks
Lynn
|
By
Lin, Lynn <Lynn.X.Lin@...>
·
#6710
·
|
|
Re: proposal: unik & cloud foundry
I really, really like this Unikernel approach, and the proxy idea for CF is very clever. It would remove a lot of adoption roadblocks from the security perspective, since you are now dealing with
I really, really like this Unikernel approach, and the proxy idea for CF is very clever. It would remove a lot of adoption roadblocks from the security perspective, since you are now dealing with
|
By
Ramiro Salas
·
#6708
·
|
|
Re: proposal: unik & cloud foundry
We can do it at summit if we want to wait that long. Is that the path that
you'd like Idit? If so, I can get a place scheduled for an open community
discussion around it.
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud
We can do it at summit if we want to wait that long. Is that the path that
you'd like Idit? If so, I can get a place scheduled for an open community
discussion around it.
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6707
·
|
|
Re: Micro Cloud Foundry
Micro cloud foundry is for older version of Cloud Foundry
Please try the
Micro cloud foundry is for older version of Cloud Foundry
Please try the
|
By
Takeshi Morikawa
·
#6706
·
|
|
FINAL REMINDER: CF CAB call THIS week Wednesday April 19th @ 8a PDT (UTC -7)
FYI...
Final reminder of the CAB call this Wednesday @ 8a PDT (UTC -7).
Zoom in for CFF updates, project highlights, and talks by: David Dabeti (CF-deployment), Dmitriy Kalinin (Turbulence BOSH
FYI...
Final reminder of the CAB call this Wednesday @ 8a PDT (UTC -7).
Zoom in for CFF updates, project highlights, and talks by: David Dabeti (CF-deployment), Dmitriy Kalinin (Turbulence BOSH
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#6704
·
|
|
Micro Cloud Foundry
Hi,
I am also impressed on Cloud Foundry and to move next level, most of the
tutorial pointing to download Micro Cloud Foundry but the page seems not
available.
Cloud you please send me the link
Hi,
I am also impressed on Cloud Foundry and to move next level, most of the
tutorial pointing to download Micro Cloud Foundry but the page seems not
available.
Cloud you please send me the link
|
By
MuthuIQSSNet <muthukrishnan.m@...>
·
#6705
·
|
|
Re: Unify bootstrap scripts
Are you familiar with bbl (bosh-bootloader)?
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-bootloader
This is a command line utility for standing up a CloudFoundry or Concourse
The team developing it has an
Are you familiar with bbl (bosh-bootloader)?
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-bootloader
This is a command line utility for standing up a CloudFoundry or Concourse
The team developing it has an
|
By
David McClure
·
#6703
·
|
|
Unify bootstrap scripts
I would like to know if there is any plan to unify the bootstrap scripts? I
personally feel that the one for aws is not so good specially when deleting
deployments. I think it could be quite easy
I would like to know if there is any plan to unify the bootstrap scripts? I
personally feel that the one for aws is not so good specially when deleting
deployments. I think it could be quite easy
|
By
Leandro David Cacciagioni
·
#6702
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for named service bindings
Hi Zach,
I am glad you find this idea useful too.
Let me know if you need further input.
Happy Easter!
Peter
Hi Zach,
I am glad you find this idea useful too.
Let me know if you need further input.
Happy Easter!
Peter
|
By
Peter Dotchev <dotchev@...>
·
#6701
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for named service bindings
Excellent. Thanks Zack!
Mike
Excellent. Thanks Zack!
Mike
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#6700
·
|