|
Re: Issue with Routing Release v149-151
Hi Mike,
Apologies that link is for a private Pivotal-only tracker story. Here is
the OSS tracker story <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/144313611>
which links to that private story. I
Hi Mike,
Apologies that link is for a private Pivotal-only tracker story. Here is
the OSS tracker story <https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/144313611>
which links to that private story. I
|
By
Abby Chau
·
#6732
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Routing Release v149-151
Hi Mike,
The tracker issue to follow is here
<https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/144128279>. Please do not
hesitate to reach out if you have any questions, thanks.
Best,
Abby
Hi Mike,
The tracker issue to follow is here
<https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/144128279>. Please do not
hesitate to reach out if you have any questions, thanks.
Best,
Abby
|
By
Abby Chau
·
#6731
·
|
|
Re: Issue with Routing Release v149-151
Thanks Abby,
Is there a tracker issue or something we can follow to get updates as they
are discovered?
Mike
Thanks Abby,
Is there a tracker issue or something we can follow to get updates as they
are discovered?
Mike
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#6730
·
|
|
Re: Java Buildpack 4.0
Congrats! This is awesome 👏
wrote:
Congrats! This is awesome 👏
wrote:
|
By
Josh Long <starbuxman@...>
·
#6729
·
|
|
Re: cflinuxfs2 (CF root FS) BOSH release rename
Hi, all,
Related to this change in BOSH releases for the cflinuxfs2 rootfs, the
manifest-generation script in Diego v1.14.0 now allows operators to use the
"-r" flag to opt into the cflinuxfs2
Hi, all,
Related to this change in BOSH releases for the cflinuxfs2 rootfs, the
manifest-generation script in Diego v1.14.0 now allows operators to use the
"-r" flag to opt into the cflinuxfs2
|
By
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
·
#6728
·
|
|
Issue with Routing Release v149-151
Hi CF Devs,
It was recently discovered that routing release versions 149-151 includes a
bug whereby increased latency and 502s can be observed.
If you have deployed cf-release 256 or greater, you
Hi CF Devs,
It was recently discovered that routing release versions 149-151 includes a
bug whereby increased latency and 502s can be observed.
If you have deployed cf-release 256 or greater, you
|
By
Abby Chau
·
#6727
·
|
|
Re: Java Buildpack 4.0
What's really wonderful about this, IMO (as one example of many), is seeing
how focused the CF technical community is on meaningful changes that are
clearly the result of maturing users and well
What's really wonderful about this, IMO (as one example of many), is seeing
how focused the CF technical community is on meaningful changes that are
clearly the result of maturing users and well
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6726
·
|
|
Re: Java Buildpack 4.0
Congrats to Ben and team!
-Dieu
Congrats to Ben and team!
-Dieu
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#6725
·
|
|
Java Buildpack 4.0
I’m pleased to announce the release of Java Buildpack 4.0. This release has been a big effort for the team over the last couple of months and is the culmination of a major focus on improving how
I’m pleased to announce the release of Java Buildpack 4.0. This release has been a big effort for the team over the last couple of months and is the culmination of a major focus on improving how
|
By
Ben Hale <bhale@...>
·
#6724
·
|
|
Update: Locks & Service Discovery in CF Runtime
Hi all,
We have been working on the milestones proposed before in order to lessen
and remove our dependencies on Consul.
Please see the updated Locks & Service Discovery in CF
Hi all,
We have been working on the milestones proposed before in order to lessen
and remove our dependencies on Consul.
Please see the updated Locks & Service Discovery in CF
|
By
Luan Santos
·
#6723
·
|
|
Re: BOSH Windows is GA! (& ACTION REQUIRED: End-of-life for Diego MSI)
So exciting!
Congrats to the BOSH Windows team!
wrote:
So exciting!
Congrats to the BOSH Windows team!
wrote:
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#6722
·
|
|
Re: BOSH Windows is GA! (& ACTION REQUIRED: End-of-life for Diego MSI)
By this we mean this is the technology that will put us on the path to full feature parity. We do, however, have a active track of work to scope and deliver persistence on Windows VMs. As far as full
By this we mean this is the technology that will put us on the path to full feature parity. We do, however, have a active track of work to scope and deliver persistence on Windows VMs. As far as full
|
By
A William Martin
·
#6721
·
|
|
Re: BOSH Windows is GA! (& ACTION REQUIRED: End-of-life for Diego MSI)
I note that your announcement says "This enables feature parity with BOSH-deployed Linux VMs”.
Does this mean it now supports persistent disk on windows?
Or is this only “feature parity” wrt
I note that your announcement says "This enables feature parity with BOSH-deployed Linux VMs”.
Does this mean it now supports persistent disk on windows?
Or is this only “feature parity” wrt
|
By
Stockley, Jonathan <Jonathan.Stockley@...>
·
#6720
·
|
|
Re: BOSH Windows is GA! (& ACTION REQUIRED: End-of-life for Diego MSI)
Amazing! Great work BOSH Windows team!
--
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry Foundation
1.267.250.0815
Amazing! Great work BOSH Windows team!
--
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry Foundation
1.267.250.0815
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6719
·
|
|
BOSH Windows is GA! (& ACTION REQUIRED: End-of-life for Diego MSI)
Hi cf-dev,
This is a very exciting email to write! I'm extremely proud to announce
that BOSH Windows, the new deployment mechanism for Windows cells, is now
generally available!
ACTION REQUIRED:
Hi cf-dev,
This is a very exciting email to write! I'm extremely proud to announce
that BOSH Windows, the new deployment mechanism for Windows cells, is now
generally available!
ACTION REQUIRED:
|
By
Colin Jackson <cojackson@...>
·
#6718
·
|
|
Re: [Proposal] Making the Service Broker API less CF-specific
Hi Gwenn,
We agree that this change is important. However, the Open Service Broker
API Change Policy [1] specifies the following:
New fields may be added to existing request/response messages. These
Hi Gwenn,
We agree that this change is important. However, the Open Service Broker
API Change Policy [1] specifies the following:
New fields may be added to existing request/response messages. These
|
By
Matt McNeeney
·
#6717
·
|
|
Re: [Proposal] Making the Service Broker API less CF-specific
HI,
I think this change is important and need to be done, I like the new
context parameters but not sure about the `optional`, I think it's
important to which env. / platform we are talking
HI,
I think this change is important and need to be done, I like the new
context parameters but not sure about the `optional`, I think it's
important to which env. / platform we are talking
|
By
Gwenn Etourneau
·
#6716
·
|
|
[Proposal] Making the Service Broker API less CF-specific
The Open Service Broker API [1] working group have created a proposal [2]
to make the Service Broker API less CF-specific. The proposed changes will
help grow the services community by allowing
The Open Service Broker API [1] working group have created a proposal [2]
to make the Service Broker API less CF-specific. The proposed changes will
help grow the services community by allowing
|
By
Matt McNeeney
·
#6715
·
|
|
CVE-2017-4973: Privilege Escalation in UAA
CF Devs,
Please see information for the following high UAA CVE. This issue was fixed
in the same releases as CVE-2017-4972 (the blind SQL injection) so if you
already have plans to upgrade, you don't
CF Devs,
Please see information for the following high UAA CVE. This issue was fixed
in the same releases as CVE-2017-4972 (the blind SQL injection) so if you
already have plans to upgrade, you don't
|
By
Molly Crowther
·
#6714
·
|
|
NOTICE: Removal of old .NET Core frameworks and SDKs from the .NET Core buildpack after 2017-05-19
Hi All,
To reduce the size of the .NET Core buildpack and discourage the use of
unsupported versions of .NET Core, we will be removing the following SDK
versions:
1.0.0-preview2-1-003177
As well
Hi All,
To reduce the size of the .NET Core buildpack and discourage the use of
unsupported versions of .NET Core, we will be removing the following SDK
versions:
1.0.0-preview2-1-003177
As well
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#6713
·
|