Hi Shannon, all, Any updates on the topic? Thanks, Bernd From: "Price, Jon" <jon.price(a)intel.com> Reply-To: "Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall."

It does. Looking forward! Sent from my iPhone

This is a followup to the concerns raised in an earlier thread titled "Issue with Routing Release v149-151". That thread notes that there is no issue with those routing releases. The underlying 502

Do you know what was used as the Diego store in the test reported below? Is it etcd or a relational database? If the later, what was

Idit, I spoke with Dr. Max about this proposal, and he and I both think that walking through the project and proposal live with the community would be best done during the monthly CAB call. The next

Hi, Maggie, You may be hitting some performance issues with regard to the load on the Diego etcd versus the capabilities of the disks it's writing to. Adding more etcd nodes doesn't improve

Hi, Juan Yes, I mean from DEA to Diego. Sorry for the typo. Thanks, Maggie Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:59 PM To: Discussions about Cloud Foundry projects and the system overall.

Dear Cloud Foundry Community, I am an SAP employee responsible for reviewing requests to use and distribute open source software in SAP products. I am reviewing a request involving code that you

Hi CF Devs, Early this week, as a response to reported increases in 502s and latency on a proprietary production environment, the routing team took an initial precautionary step to advise the OSS

Good work! You might consider whether to add it to the cloudfoundry-community org to help with discoverability. -Dieu

Maggie, I'm not sure, but, do you mean migrating *from* DEA to Diego? Thank you!! 2017-04-27 4:03 GMT-03:00 Meng, Xiangyi <Xiangyi.Meng(a)dell.com>: -- Mis mejores deseos, Best wishes, Meilleurs

Hi, We are migrating our application from Diego backend to Dea backend. But recently we experienced some intermittent failures when pushing application or fetching application status. We found below

Hi all, I just published a new node.js package for easy lookup of service bindings in Cloud Foundry. https://github.com/dotchev/cf-services It is a simpler alternative to cfenv. Any feedback is

Hi All, After June 1, 2017, new releases created in the following buildpack BOSH release repositories will not supply “offline” or “cached” buildpacks that are packaged with their

Dear Luan, Maybe that's a stupid question which has already been answered, but doesn't consul release 0.8 address most of the criticism from the CF community? I see now big efforts on all sides (CF

Hi, Yes you right! I really mean to say application staging logs and following are sample output which I am not able to see for CF v255/256/257 for Diego as a default backend. It’s working for me

Hello, By "application startup logs", do you mean application staging logs?? Can you paste log lines which are missing? Thanks Ronak wrote:

Hello, I have seen some changes related to “cf logs app_name” command from CF v255 onwards on Openstack using Diego as a default container. CF v254 is working for me. I am not getting

👍 thank you! Chip Childers CTO, Cloud Foundry Foundation 1.267.250.0815

Hi Chip, Thanks for your email. We initially observed this issue on a proprietary production environment, and we are still currently investigating the root cause of what have been observed increases