Looks good! wrote: -- *Zach Brown* | Strategic Product Owner 650-954-0427 - mobile zbrown(a)pivotal.io <http://pivotal.io>

Thanks for the response! See comments inline: Interesting. That behavior is different for bindings in the owning space. Today if a space developer wishes to delete a service in its owning

Hi Zach, Disregard that last message. Paul found the bug, fixed it. Video is playing correctly now and looks great. Thank you! -Chris

Hi Zach, Nice catch. I hadn't been told the video was up yet. Asciinema is pretty cool and also frequently annoying, it seems. I looked at the json file for your video, and the curl and response

Thanks for the feedback Mike, and great questions! We're currently working off slightly different assumptions, but are working through these to validate that they are the expected behaviour for the

Exciting!

Hey Chris Noticed the .NET ascii video is up on cloudfoundry.org/platform. There seems to be a formatting issue with this one too. I think it has to do with the number of lines in the terminal. It

Great! I just thought of some questions and didn't see them listed in the thread. * I assume that the space that originally created the service would be a kind of "owning" space right? So that

Super excited to start the process for incubation to the Runtime PMC for this! This set of features has long been requested and I'm excited to see forward progress on it. Will reach out to you with

Hello, Pivotal would like to propose to the CF Runtime PMC a new incubation project, "CF Permissions", focusing on improving the authorization experience in Cloud Foundry. This project aims to enable

Hi all, I'm pleased to say that work will shortly be starting on the following sharing service instances workflows: $ cf share-service SERVICE_INSTANCE TARGET_ORG TARGET_SPACE $ cf unshare-service

Hello , We have observed that the working on cf disable-service-access is broken with the latest CF release . we are on release no: 271 Below are the details of the issue : 1. cf

[I have no idea if there's an existing protocol for posting messages like this. If so, I apologize! Please redirect me to the right place and feel free to nuke this message from the list

Namespace collisions FTW! The "Marketplace" within the platform is what we all know and love (service brokers expose stuff, CF admins make available to devs, devs consume). What the email below is

Hello Chip, How does this new "marketplace" relate to the current marketplace, described here: https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/devguide/services/ ? TIA, jane wrote:

This isn't CF development or usage related, but it may be relevant to many of you. Apologies for hitting your inbox if it isn't. The CFF team is building a "marketplace".. (basically an online

Hi Zach, We are already using cf release greater than 255, I still see the same issue. Any idea why this should be happening?

Hi Wenqun, I'm not much of a front-end person. How do you define "dynamic" in this sense? I've seen the term used in Angular projects to refer to deciding which modules loaded in at run-time, which

Hi Sachin, It may not support Elastic Cache, but there is a Redis Service Broker <https://docs.pivotal.io/partners/rle-service-broker/> for Pivotal Labs that works with Redis

Hello, Is there a way to deploy a full fledged dynamic angular2 application in CloudFoundry? There is a staticfile buildpack, I assume it won't support dynamic content. Looking forward hearing back