|
Re: [cf-bosh] Project Quarks CF Operator 1.0
way to go Quarksteam! Awesome news!
From: "ChrisClark" <cclark@...>
To: cf-bosh@...
Cc: "cf-dev@..."<cf-dev@...>
Date: 20/12/201918:57
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cf-dev]
way to go Quarksteam! Awesome news!
From: "ChrisClark" <cclark@...>
To: cf-bosh@...
Cc: "cf-dev@..."<cf-dev@...>
Date: 20/12/201918:57
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cf-dev]
|
By
Simon D Moser
·
#8821
·
|
|
Re: [cf-bosh] Project Quarks CF Operator 1.0
Congrats Vlad and the rest of the Quarks team! That's great news.--
Chris Clark
Technical Operations Manager
Cloud Foundry Foundation
Congrats Vlad and the rest of the Quarks team! That's great news.--
Chris Clark
Technical Operations Manager
Cloud Foundry Foundation
|
By
Chris Clark
·
#8820
·
|
|
Project Quarks CF Operator 1.0
Hello everyone,
On behalf of the Quarks team, I'd like to introduce Cloud Foundry Operator v1.0.0.
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/cf-operator/releases/tag/v1.0.0
This is our first
Hello everyone,
On behalf of the Quarks team, I'd like to introduce Cloud Foundry Operator v1.0.0.
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/cf-operator/releases/tag/v1.0.0
This is our first
|
By
Vlad Iovanov <VIovanov@...>
·
#8819
·
|
|
Re: KubeCF and Quarks – status and plans
#cf
And if you’re looking for some new video content on Quarks, we did a webinar recently which was recorded for your educational
And if you’re looking for some new video content on Quarks, we did a webinar recently which was recorded for your educational
|
By
Dr Nic Williams <drnicwilliams@...>
·
#8818
·
|
|
Re: KubeCF and Quarks – status and plans
#cf
If anyone is looking for a small example of a BOSH release with a Helm chart for Quarks deployment and README docs, I’ve got an example at:
*
If anyone is looking for a small example of a BOSH release with a Helm chart for Quarks deployment and README docs, I’ve got an example at:
*
|
By
Dr Nic Williams <drnicwilliams@...>
·
#8817
·
|
|
Re: KubeCF and Quarks – status and plans
#cf
This is fantastic news,Troy and team. Thanks for sharing.
Ill contact you to see if a CAB presentation makes sense. Especially if a brief demo showing ease of deployment could be shown.
Slack you
This is fantastic news,Troy and team. Thanks for sharing.
Ill contact you to see if a CAB presentation makes sense. Especially if a brief demo showing ease of deployment could be shown.
Slack you
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#8816
·
|
|
KubeCF and Quarks – status and plans
#cf
KubeCF (formerly the v3 branch of SUSE/scf) produces builds of CFAR which can be deployed to Kubernetes with Helm and managed by the cf-operator. Though this is currently in the SUSE namespace, the
KubeCF (formerly the v3 branch of SUSE/scf) produces builds of CFAR which can be deployed to Kubernetes with Helm and managed by the cf-operator. Though this is currently in the SUSE namespace, the
|
By
Troy Topnik
·
#8815
·
|
|
FW: From the Desk of the Executive Director - December 2019
Hi Everyone,
As Abby shared in the update from “Desk of the Executive Director” here, Cloud Foundry Summits in 2020 will be slightly different.
Cloud Foundry Summits in 2020 will be
Hi Everyone,
As Abby shared in the update from “Desk of the Executive Director” here, Cloud Foundry Summits in 2020 will be slightly different.
Cloud Foundry Summits in 2020 will be
|
By
Swarna Podila
·
#8814
·
|
|
[Proposal] CAPI V3 Service Offerings and Service Plans
Hello everyone,
The Services API Team has been working on a model for the Cloud Controller V3 API for service offerings and service plans.
You can view the proposals here:
Service Offerings -
Hello everyone,
The Services API Team has been working on a model for the Cloud Controller V3 API for service offerings and service plans.
You can view the proposals here:
Service Offerings -
|
By
George Blue
·
#8813
·
|
|
CF CAB 2019 Survey
Hi, all,
Please spare 5 minutes (might be even less) to take this 4 questions survey to help shape Cloud Foundry and the Community Advisory Board (CAB) calls and organization in 2020.
Hi, all,
Please spare 5 minutes (might be even less) to take this 4 questions survey to help shape Cloud Foundry and the Community Advisory Board (CAB) calls and organization in 2020.
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#8812
·
|
|
CAB call for December 2019 - CANCELED
Hi, all,
As per discussions in last CAB call, we are canceling the last one of the year (scheduled next week) since it's so close to the year end holidays. We will reconvene on January 15th where we
Hi, all,
As per discussions in last CAB call, we are canceling the last one of the year (scheduled next week) since it's so close to the year end holidays. We will reconvene on January 15th where we
|
By
Michael Maximilien
·
#8811
·
|
|
CFP tracker and #jobs on CF Slack
#jobs
Hi Everyone, please note:
I’ve shared aspreadsheet on CF Slack with a list of tech conferences, dates, and CFP deadlines, etc. I’ll be adding more to the list as I learn about other conferences;
Hi Everyone, please note:
I’ve shared aspreadsheet on CF Slack with a list of tech conferences, dates, and CFP deadlines, etc. I’ll be adding more to the list as I learn about other conferences;
|
By
Swarna Podila
·
#8810
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL MESSAGE] Re: [cf-dev] Using SAML 2 Bearer token with our own UAA Server
#uaa
Thanks.
The SAML assertion generated by ADFS contains "https://<HIDDEN>/saml/SSO/alias/cloudfoundry-saml-login-dev" while the bearer assertion in the metadata file is
Thanks.
The SAML assertion generated by ADFS contains "https://<HIDDEN>/saml/SSO/alias/cloudfoundry-saml-login-dev" while the bearer assertion in the metadata file is
|
By
Shetty, Viraj S [CTR]
·
#8809
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL MESSAGE] Re: [cf-dev] Using SAML 2 Bearer token with our own UAA Server
#uaa
probably https:// and not http://
probably https:// and not http://
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#8808
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL MESSAGE] Re: [cf-dev] Using SAML 2 Bearer token with our own UAA Server
#uaa
It's been a while since I dug into that code, but I think the Recipient should match the URL you're posting the message to, which is:
http://<host>/uaa/oauth/token/alias/cloudfoundry-saml-login-dev
It's been a while since I dug into that code, but I think the Recipient should match the URL you're posting the message to, which is:
http://<host>/uaa/oauth/token/alias/cloudfoundry-saml-login-dev
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#8807
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL MESSAGE] Re: [cf-dev] Using SAML 2 Bearer token with our own UAA Server
#uaa
Thanks. I digged into this a little deeper. During the SAML verification, confirmed is never TRUE and that’s why it gives the following error
2019-12-10T16:45:24.58-0500 [APP/PROC/WEB/1] OUT
Thanks. I digged into this a little deeper. During the SAML verification, confirmed is never TRUE and that’s why it gives the following error
2019-12-10T16:45:24.58-0500 [APP/PROC/WEB/1] OUT
|
By
Shetty, Viraj S [CTR]
·
#8806
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Using SAML 2 Bearer token with our own UAA Server
#uaa
1. Take a look at the endpoint `/saml/metadata` on your server. For example https://login.run.pivotal.io/saml/metadata
In the metadata, take a look at: urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:bindings:URI
1. Take a look at the endpoint `/saml/metadata` on your server. For example https://login.run.pivotal.io/saml/metadata
In the metadata, take a look at: urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:bindings:URI
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#8805
·
|
|
Re: Using SAML 2 Bearer token with our own UAA Server
#uaa
Still having issues. I tried several things and they all seem to fail.
1. Per the documenatation, the URL should go to
Still having issues. I tried several things and they all seem to fail.
1. Per the documenatation, the URL should go to
|
By
Shetty, Viraj S [CTR]
·
#8804
·
|
|
Re: Using SAML 2 Bearer token with our own UAA Server
#uaa
Assertion can be signed, encrypted(name ID) or both.
Unsigned and Unencrypted is not recommended.
Filip
Assertion can be signed, encrypted(name ID) or both.
Unsigned and Unencrypted is not recommended.
Filip
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#8803
·
|
|
Re: Using SAML 2 Bearer token with our own UAA Server
#uaa
Thanks Filip. You are correct and thanks for pointing it out. I will pass Assertion and see what happens.
As a side question - I am assuming that the Assertion would have to be unencrypted. right ?
Thanks Filip. You are correct and thanks for pointing it out. I will pass Assertion and see what happens.
As a side question - I am assuming that the Assertion would have to be unencrypted. right ?
|
By
Shetty, Viraj S [CTR]
·
#8802
·
|