|
Maven and Gradle plugins removed from cf-java-client
Hi guys,
I've found several references online to a maven plugin for cloudfoundry (including artifacts in Maven Central), but I noticed the source code is no longer available. Between versions
Hi guys,
I've found several references online to a maven plugin for cloudfoundry (including artifacts in Maven Central), but I noticed the source code is no longer available. Between versions
|
By
Steven Swor
·
#6853
·
|
|
Proposal: Remove nats_stream_forwarder from nats-release and cf-release
Hi cf-dev,
If you've dug around in nats-release, you may have noticed the
nats_stream_forwarder[0]. It's a component that subscribes to the top-level
NATS channel ">", produces a log line, and
Hi cf-dev,
If you've dug around in nats-release, you may have noticed the
nats_stream_forwarder[0]. It's a component that subscribes to the top-level
NATS channel ">", produces a log line, and
|
By
David Sabeti
·
#6852
·
|
|
Re: Service brokered route services binding issues
Hi Sergio,
Good to hear. If you want to update the service catalog you can run cf
update-service-broker.
Greets
Christian
Sergio Rozenszajn <sergio.rozenszajn(a)sap.com> schrieb am Mi., 24. Mai
Hi Sergio,
Good to hear. If you want to update the service catalog you can run cf
update-service-broker.
Greets
Christian
Sergio Rozenszajn <sergio.rozenszajn(a)sap.com> schrieb am Mi., 24. Mai
|
By
Christian Brinker
·
#6851
·
|
|
Re: Service brokered route services binding issues
Hi Christian,
The issue is solved now. After adding some logs I realized that the catalog is read by Cloud Controller only once, during service broker registration. After deleting the service-broker
Hi Christian,
The issue is solved now. After adding some logs I realized that the catalog is read by Cloud Controller only once, during service broker registration. After deleting the service-broker
|
By
Rozenszajn, Sergio
·
#6850
·
|
|
Re: Service brokered route services binding issues
Hi Christian,
I've set bindable to false as you suggested and it is still failing.
I added some logs in our "handleBinding" method but it is not reached. I guess Cloud Controller is not trying to
Hi Christian,
I've set bindable to false as you suggested and it is still failing.
I added some logs in our "handleBinding" method but it is not reached. I guess Cloud Controller is not trying to
|
By
Rozenszajn, Sergio
·
#6849
·
|
|
Re: [vcap-dev] Re: Removal of Console and Debug support!
Thanks Mike! Definitely a long time coming.
I hadn't known about this functionality, it was so long ago. 😀
Thanks Mike! Definitely a long time coming.
I hadn't known about this functionality, it was so long ago. 😀
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#6848
·
|
|
Re: [vcap-dev] Re: Removal of Console and Debug support!
It was fun digging this thread out of the archives.
Thanks for keeping these features in the CC for so long. Now that we're
fully transitioned to Diego you can safely remove debug and console
It was fun digging this thread out of the archives.
Thanks for keeping these features in the CC for so long. Now that we're
fully transitioned to Diego you can safely remove debug and console
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#6847
·
|
|
Re: push an app + services + something else
I've seen this done with shell / batch scripts before. The script would be
responsible for making sure that the services have been created and the
names match up with what is expected in the manfest
I've seen this done with shell / batch scripts before. The script would be
responsible for making sure that the services have been created and the
names match up with what is expected in the manfest
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#6846
·
|
|
Deployment lock stuck in CloudFoundry
I have cloud foundry deployed on azure machines using bosh. For adding another node to the cluster I made changes in the cloud foundry deployment manifest file and redeployed cloud foundry using 'bosh
I have cloud foundry deployed on azure machines using bosh. For adding another node to the cluster I made changes in the cloud foundry deployment manifest file and redeployed cloud foundry using 'bosh
|
By
Monish Kaul
·
#6843
·
|
|
push an app + services + something else
Hi collleagues,
assumed a CF user has an account somewhere on cf.mybestcloudsolution.com
where its app is running. The user has also an account on github where the
source code of the app is saved. The
Hi collleagues,
assumed a CF user has an account somewhere on cf.mybestcloudsolution.com
where its app is running. The user has also an account on github where the
source code of the app is saved. The
|
By
CF_genn <CF_subscription@...>
·
#6845
·
|
|
CloudFoundry Issue with deployment locks
Hi,
I am new to cloud foundry hence pardon me if my question is missing
something obvious. One of my teammate has posted this
Hi,
I am new to cloud foundry hence pardon me if my question is missing
something obvious. One of my teammate has posted this
|
By
Monish Kaul
·
#6844
·
|
|
Re: Service brokered route services binding issues
Hi Sergio,
on first glance this looks, as you seems to be a problem of your catalog
definition because the cloud controller only checks the returned JSON and
the return messages/status codes of the
Hi Sergio,
on first glance this looks, as you seems to be a problem of your catalog
definition because the cloud controller only checks the returned JSON and
the return messages/status codes of the
|
By
Christian Brinker
·
#6842
·
|
|
Service brokered route services binding issues
Hi,
I've created a service broker in Pivotal CF that generates service instances that should be used as route services. According to the documentation
Hi,
I've created a service broker in Pivotal CF that generates service instances that should be used as route services. According to the documentation
|
By
Rozenszajn, Sergio
·
#6841
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Add support for SUSE stack and stemcells
Hi Jeff,
cool stuff. Good to here you bring in that aspect into the community. For
me that sounds like the nearly same pattern as with bosh, we talked about
at OS Summit in Boston. There are some
Hi Jeff,
cool stuff. Good to here you bring in that aspect into the community. For
me that sounds like the nearly same pattern as with bosh, we talked about
at OS Summit in Boston. There are some
|
By
Christian Brinker
·
#6840
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Add support for SUSE stack and stemcells
Hi Jeff,
This is indeed exciting. With our large set of on prem software installations running on more “Enterprisy” Linux distros offering a SUSE stemcell opens up a couple of opportunities.
Hi Jeff,
This is indeed exciting. With our large set of on prem software installations running on more “Enterprisy” Linux distros offering a SUSE stemcell opens up a couple of opportunities.
|
By
Krannich, Bernd <bernd.krannich@...>
·
#6839
·
|
|
Re: Incubation Proposal: Kubo (Kubernetes on BOSH)
Thanks to all who attended CAB call last week, and for reviewing our
proposal.
We will continue addressing comments/questions that are added into the
proposal
Thanks to all who attended CAB call last week, and for reviewing our
proposal.
We will continue addressing comments/questions that are added into the
proposal
|
By
Alejandro Goyen
·
#6838
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Add support for SUSE stack and stemcells
Exciting stuff. In particular, getting an OS vendor involved in the
upstream seems like a really good move for the community overall. :)
--
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry
Exciting stuff. In particular, getting an OS vendor involved in the
upstream seems like a really good move for the community overall. :)
--
Chip Childers
CTO, Cloud Foundry
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6837
·
|
|
Re: [IMPORTANT] EOL for Legacy DEA Backend May 22, 2017, Today!
This is amazing to see. Great work everyone in the project teams, both
those that created the Diego / Garden approach and those that maintained
the DEA architecture over the EOL period.
--
Chip
This is amazing to see. Great work everyone in the project teams, both
those that created the Diego / Garden approach and those that maintained
the DEA architecture over the EOL period.
--
Chip
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#6835
·
|
|
[IMPORTANT] EOL for Legacy DEA Backend May 22, 2017, Today!
Hello All,
The EOL for the Legacy DEA Backend is today, May 22, 2017
You can find the previous notice of this here [1] and here [2].
Documentation on how to migrate to Diego can be found here
Hello All,
The EOL for the Legacy DEA Backend is today, May 22, 2017
You can find the previous notice of this here [1] and here [2].
Documentation on how to migrate to Diego can be found here
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#6834
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2017-4992: Privilege escalation with user invitations
I'm not seeing this information included in the CVE announcement. Can
you point me to where this is published please?
thanks,
Alex
I'm not seeing this information included in the CVE announcement. Can
you point me to where this is published please?
thanks,
Alex
|
By
Alex Tomlins <alex.tomlins@...>
·
#6833
·
|