The Cloud Foundry Foundation and Pivotal Inc discovered an exploit for remote command injection. It's long been fixed, however we realized that many community projects still contain the exploit. If

Hi Max, I highly recommend not using appear.in for meetings with multiple people. I've had many bad experiences lately when more than one person is on the call. -Dieu wrote:

Hi Shannon, Thanks for the feedback solicitation on this feature, and for sharing the inception summary material with the community. In the case of Orange, the partitioned routing table is a must

FYI Lists will blip ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jordan Evans <jevans(a)linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:45 PM Subject: [it-infrastructure-alerts] Thursday, January

Thanks Max. Using the opportunity to remind of the Abacus Broker inception on January 31st @ 10a PST Use the following link to add it to your

Got it, so what I said before hold. We view access control as a must and partitioned routing table a nice to have. Thanks, Mike

Hi Mike, Thank you for the feedback. Without access control for domains, a developer could map route foo.example.com (for which the LB will route requests only to the router group for IS-1) to an

Thanks. Updated. Best, max wrote: -- max http://maximilien.org http://blog.maximilien.com

Question, Just want to make sure I'm following you. In your Access Control example you mention that without access control a developer would be able to create a route to foo.example.com in a space

Hi Michael, Thank you for adding "Private Stacks" to the list. I'm sorry I haven't told you about my affiliation. Please fix it to "owner company: NTT Communications" . Regards, NTT

Last week the CF Routing team incepted on enhancements for dedicated deployments of the CF routers for isolation segments. - Original proposal

fyi... Join me on 30 January 2017 @ 11a PDT for our monthly recurring meeting. Online meeting: https://appear.in/cf-extensions Use the following link to add it to your calendar:

HAProxy in cf-release has the same limitation, so removal of it would be no worse. Historically, we've taken the approach that BOSH releases can be deployed to any infrastructure that BOSH supports,

Hello Carlo, There are no plans to use Zap in other components. Best, Shannon Coen Product Manager, Cloud Foundry Pivotal, Inc. carlo.ferraris(a)rakuten.com> wrote:

Hi Shannon, Sorry for late delay on this. termination. Since support for TLS termination was added to Gorouter, load balancing may be the remaining use case. I understand the gorouter still only

Shannon, Are there plans to extend the use of zap to all CF components? Thanks, Carlo

Hi, all, I am trying to get a handle on all pending proposals to CF-Extensions as well as anything proposed to CF that is now orphaned or would like to be considered in the CF-Extensions PMC. I have

Hi, As discussed today, I will be happy to help you run the inception. If anyone else (with more experience) was interested in helping, please ping me and Hristo. See you all (virtually) online on

Dan, I’m concerned that .user.ini and .htaccess files are processed for every request. This is a no-no for production apps. As for overriding the entire php.ini, I’m in favor of extensibility.

Thanks Ben. I will try with the new Java Client.