|
Installing Diego feedback
I just got Diego successfully integrated and deployed in my Cloud Foundry
dev environment. Here's a bit of feedback.
One of the really nice features of BOSH is that you can set a property once
and
I just got Diego successfully integrated and deployed in my Cloud Foundry
dev environment. Here's a bit of feedback.
One of the really nice features of BOSH is that you can set a property once
and
|
By
Mike Heath
·
#633
·
|
|
UAA and ADFS
Hello,
We want to integrate UAA with our ADFS for authentication purpose. Is there
a walk through on how to do it.
I read that UAA supports SAML and LDAP. There are bunch of information
regarding
Hello,
We want to integrate UAA with our ADFS for authentication purpose. Is there
a walk through on how to do it.
I read that UAA supports SAML and LDAP. There are bunch of information
regarding
|
By
Maaz Khan <maazkhansgsits@...>
·
#632
·
|
|
Re: Can't create/update buildpacks, "a filename must be specified"
Hi Kyle,
This component is specifically designed to work with Nginx. Despite the
fact that you can successfully upload a buildpack by making a small change
with Nginx disabled there are many other
Hi Kyle,
This component is specifically designed to work with Nginx. Despite the
fact that you can successfully upload a buildpack by making a small change
with Nginx disabled there are many other
|
By
CF Runtime
·
#631
·
|
|
Re: Can't create/update buildpacks, "a filename must be specified"
I know it's recommended, but uploading buildpacks seems to just be plain
broken without it (though I fixed it by changing 1 line of code in the
cloud controller). The question is, is this supposed to
I know it's recommended, but uploading buildpacks seems to just be plain
broken without it (though I fixed it by changing 1 line of code in the
cloud controller). The question is, is this supposed to
|
By
kyle havlovitz <kylehav@...>
·
#630
·
|
|
Re: Can't create/update buildpacks, "a filename must be specified"
Hi Kyle,
We highly recommend using Nginx as a proxy for uploads and downloads
to/from the cloud controller. Without it all long-running data transfers to
the CC will block that instance of the cloud
Hi Kyle,
We highly recommend using Nginx as a proxy for uploads and downloads
to/from the cloud controller. Without it all long-running data transfers to
the CC will block that instance of the cloud
|
By
CF Runtime
·
#629
·
|
|
Re: When will diego release?
click on the "X" towards the top right. you'll see the backlog view where
there are a bunch of stories above this release marker that are being
worked on by the dev team.
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
click on the "X" towards the top right. you'll see the backlog view where
there are a bunch of stories above this release marker that are being
worked on by the dev team.
--
Thank you,
James Bayer
|
By
James Bayer
·
#628
·
|
|
Re: When will diego release?
I've been wondering about this before: how do you actually "track"
anything with such a marker? Even if I create an account on Pivotal
tracker, all I get to see is
I've been wondering about this before: how do you actually "track"
anything with such a marker? Even if I create an account on Pivotal
tracker, all I get to see is
|
By
Jan Dubois <jand@...>
·
#627
·
|
|
Re: Can't create/update buildpacks, "a filename must be specified"
The thing is, I got it to work with use_nginx set to false just by
modifying one line of code in buildpack_bits_controller.rb. Couldn't the
code just be changed to support this?
The thing is, I got it to work with use_nginx set to false just by
modifying one line of code in buildpack_bits_controller.rb. Couldn't the
code just be changed to support this?
|
By
kyle havlovitz <kylehav@...>
·
#626
·
|
|
Re: Can't create/update buildpacks, "a filename must be specified"
Yes, nginx is required.
-Dieu
Yes, nginx is required.
-Dieu
|
By
Dieu Cao <dcao@...>
·
#625
·
|
|
Re: When will diego release?
windows containers can be run alongside diego today, but it is not at
feature parity. you can track that with this release marker:
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/97428076
wrote:
--
Thank
windows containers can be run alongside diego today, but it is not at
feature parity. you can track that with this release marker:
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/97428076
wrote:
--
Thank
|
By
James Bayer
·
#624
·
|
|
Re: Can't create/update buildpacks, "a filename must be specified"
Yes, I have nginx disabled, would that cause problems uploading a buildpack
like this?
wrote:
Yes, I have nginx disabled, would that cause problems uploading a buildpack
like this?
wrote:
|
By
kyle havlovitz <kylehav@...>
·
#623
·
|
|
Re: CF rollback issue from v210 to v202
We encountered the same problem today, and the solution is to delete the
records of those files from a table(schema_migrations) in ccdb.
The files are located under
We encountered the same problem today, and the solution is to delete the
records of those files from a table(schema_migrations) in ccdb.
The files are located under
|
By
Ning Fu
·
#622
·
|
|
Re: CF rollback issue from v210 to v202
Thanks a lot James. we will try it out.
Thanks a lot James. we will try it out.
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#621
·
|
|
Re: When will diego release?
Hi All,
Dose this mean Garden Container [windows] will be available along with
Diego ?
Thanks
balaramaraju
--
J L S P Balaramaraju
Hi All,
Dose this mean Garden Container [windows] will be available along with
Diego ?
Thanks
balaramaraju
--
J L S P Balaramaraju
|
By
Balaramaraju JLSP <balaramaraju@...>
·
#620
·
|
|
Re: CF rollback issue from v210 to v202
if you backup the databases before the upgrade, then you could restore the
databases before the rollback deployment. we don't ever rollback at
pivotal, we roll forward with fixes. i recommend testing
if you backup the databases before the upgrade, then you could restore the
databases before the rollback deployment. we don't ever rollback at
pivotal, we roll forward with fixes. i recommend testing
|
By
James Bayer
·
#619
·
|
|
Re: Document for service broker api version 2.5
Thank Shannon for your detailed explanation. It is really useful for us.
Have a good day,
Regards,
--
NGUYEN Hong Chau
--
Nguyen Hong-Chau
Thank Shannon for your detailed explanation. It is really useful for us.
Have a good day,
Regards,
--
NGUYEN Hong Chau
--
Nguyen Hong-Chau
|
By
NGUYEN Hong Chau <nguyenhongchau@...>
·
#618
·
|
|
Re: Can't create/update buildpacks, "a filename must be specified"
You may need to supply your access log from the nginx in front of cc or the
cc log because when I create a new buildpack, it's working just fine:
$ CF_TRACE=true cf create-buildpack
You may need to supply your access log from the nginx in front of cc or the
cc log because when I create a new buildpack, it's working just fine:
$ CF_TRACE=true cf create-buildpack
|
By
Matthew Sykes <matthew.sykes@...>
·
#617
·
|
|
Re: CF rollback issue from v210 to v202
Hi James,
Thanks a lot , Please could you tell us what is the clean way of doing
rollback from v210 to v202.
Regards
Lingesh M
Hi James,
Thanks a lot , Please could you tell us what is the clean way of doing
rollback from v210 to v202.
Regards
Lingesh M
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#616
·
|
|
Re: Document for service broker api version 2.5
Nguyen,
The cause of your error is explained here:
App Log Streaming -
http://docs.cloudfoundry.org/services/app-log-streaming.html
Your broker is returning syslog_drain_url in response to a bind
Nguyen,
The cause of your error is explained here:
App Log Streaming -
http://docs.cloudfoundry.org/services/app-log-streaming.html
Your broker is returning syslog_drain_url in response to a bind
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#615
·
|
|
Re: Document for service broker api version 2.5
We have just published documentation for the service broker API
specification v2.5, which adds support for arbitrary parameters with
create, update, and
We have just published documentation for the service broker API
specification v2.5, which adds support for arbitrary parameters with
create, update, and
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#614
·
|