|
Re: routing-release 0.141.0
Great release Shannon! I've been waiting for relational db support before
we started using the routing api. Do you consider mysql/postresql support
production ready with this release or is it still
Great release Shannon! I've been waiting for relational db support before
we started using the routing api. Do you consider mysql/postresql support
production ready with this release or is it still
|
By
Mike Youngstrom <youngm@...>
·
#6000
·
|
|
Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements
Great ideas, Guillaume. Especially public pipelines displaying smoke test
results for each provider and displaying risk of vulnerability (comparison
of the providers deployed version of core vs latest
Great ideas, Guillaume. Especially public pipelines displaying smoke test
results for each provider and displaying risk of vulnerability (comparison
of the providers deployed version of core vs latest
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#5999
·
|
|
routing-release 0.141.0
Today we released routing-release v0.141.0 with support for a zero-downtime
migration from etcd to mysql or postgresql as the backing store for the
routing-api. We changed our data store because the
Today we released routing-release v0.141.0 with support for a zero-downtime
migration from etcd to mysql or postgresql as the backing store for the
routing-api. We changed our data store because the
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#5998
·
|
|
Re: CF restage is not cleaning old instances v243 [bug]
here is how you can reproduce the issue:
1. CF PUSH APP with just one instance
2. look at the routes for that app in gorouter routes you will see one IP
address bind to that route
3. restage your
here is how you can reproduce the issue:
1. CF PUSH APP with just one instance
2. look at the routes for that app in gorouter routes you will see one IP
address bind to that route
3. restage your
|
By
Amulya Sharma <amulya.sharma@...>
·
#5997
·
|
|
Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements
Thanks Dieu and Chip for explicitly asking feedback on the 2017
certification process, and leaving time for the CF community to provide
such feedback. I see seldom comments in the google docs document
Thanks Dieu and Chip for explicitly asking feedback on the 2017
certification process, and leaving time for the CF community to provide
such feedback. I see seldom comments in the google docs document
|
By
Guillaume Berche
·
#5996
·
|
|
Re: Diego v0.1488.0 to support only garden-runc as its Linux Garden backend
An addendum: if you obtain garden-runc-release tarballs from bosh.io,
please update to use the "cloudfoundry" location (https://bosh.io/releases/
github.com/cloudfoundry/garden-runc-release) instead
An addendum: if you obtain garden-runc-release tarballs from bosh.io,
please update to use the "cloudfoundry" location (https://bosh.io/releases/
github.com/cloudfoundry/garden-runc-release) instead
|
By
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
·
#5995
·
|
|
CVE-2016-6658 Incomplete fix for Credential Vulnerability for Custom Buildpacks
CVE-2016-6658 Incomplete fix for Credential Vulnerability for Custom
Buildpacks
Severity
Medium
Vendor
Cloud Foundry Foundation
Versions Affected
-
cf-release versions prior to
CVE-2016-6658 Incomplete fix for Credential Vulnerability for Custom
Buildpacks
Severity
Medium
Vendor
Cloud Foundry Foundation
Versions Affected
-
cf-release versions prior to
|
By
Molly Crowther
·
#5994
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for supporting the application of multiple buildpacks to a CF app
+ Pivotal PMs/Anchors for visibility
+ Pivotal PMs/Anchors for visibility
|
By
Stephen Levine
·
#5991
·
|
|
Re: Credentials still available to app after unbind and restage
again this is on our CF deployment broker is also ours .. and app is also
ours not on PWS
wrote:
again this is on our CF deployment broker is also ours .. and app is also
ours not on PWS
wrote:
|
By
Amulya Sharma <amulya.sharma@...>
·
#5993
·
|
|
Re: Credentials still available to app after unbind and restage
Thanks for trying John ..
I dont think its broker issue .. or can it be ..
it may be app issue but broker is presenting right credentials .. but this
is intermittent .. I was wondering is there
Thanks for trying John ..
I dont think its broker issue .. or can it be ..
it may be app issue but broker is presenting right credentials .. but this
is intermittent .. I was wondering is there
|
By
Amulya Sharma <amulya.sharma@...>
·
#5992
·
|
|
Re: Credentials still available to app after unbind and restage
I can't reproduce this. After restaging, the app no longer has service instance
1's environment variables.
Which service broker is this? Could this be a bug in your service broker where
it's reusing
I can't reproduce this. After restaging, the app no longer has service instance
1's environment variables.
Which service broker is this? Could this be a bug in your service broker where
it's reusing
|
By
John Feminella <jxf@...>
·
#5990
·
|
|
Credentials still available to app after unbind and restage
team,
we are having a unique issue of service credentials still available to
application even after unbind and restage of application.. we looked at the
app it is not storing creds anywhere .. this
team,
we are having a unique issue of service credentials still available to
application even after unbind and restage of application.. we looked at the
app it is not storing creds anywhere .. this
|
By
Amulya Sharma <amulya.sharma@...>
·
#5989
·
|
|
Diego v0.1488.0 to support only garden-runc as its Linux Garden backend
Hi, all,
When the Diego team creates its next final version of diego-release,
v0.1488.0, it will no longer support or function correctly with
garden-linux. In addition to the work already in flight
Hi, all,
When the Diego team creates its next final version of diego-release,
v0.1488.0, it will no longer support or function correctly with
garden-linux. In addition to the work already in flight
|
By
Eric Malm <emalm@...>
·
#5987
·
|
|
Re: Memory usage: number reported from `cf app <app>` vs. inside container
Hi John,
Unfortunately memory usage inside containers is a bit of a painful topic.
I've linked to a really great blog by Heroku on this topic below that goes
in to more detail but tl;dr there's not a
Hi John,
Unfortunately memory usage inside containers is a bit of a painful topic.
I've linked to a really great blog by Heroku on this topic below that goes
in to more detail but tl;dr there's not a
|
By
Julz Friedman
·
#5986
·
|
|
Re: cloudfoundry file descriptor limit is too small
folks ,
any insight ?
By
Lynn Lin
·
#5985
·
|
|
Proposal of Private Stacks ( Stacks for limited users ) (Re: Private Stacks ( Stacks for limited users ))
Hi Nick,
Thanks for you reply.
able to assign a space to have access to an Isolation Segment where the
“private” stack is available. Other spaces, while able to see the “private”
stack with
Hi Nick,
Thanks for you reply.
able to assign a space to have access to an Isolation Segment where the
“private” stack is available. Other spaces, while able to see the “private”
stack with
|
By
Takahito SEYAMA
·
#5984
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for supporting the application of multiple buildpacks to a CF app
This is super cool!
Thanks
Brian
___________________________
Brian Roche
Senior Director of Software Engineering
Dell EMC | Cloud Platform Team
mobile 781 727 7337
follow me
This is super cool!
Thanks
Brian
___________________________
Brian Roche
Senior Director of Software Engineering
Dell EMC | Cloud Platform Team
mobile 781 727 7337
follow me
|
By
Roche, Brian <Brian.Roche@...>
·
#5988
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for supporting the application of multiple buildpacks to a CF app
+1 - Can't wait. This looks like it will be a nice step forward for build
packs!
Dan
+1 - Can't wait. This looks like it will be a nice step forward for build
packs!
Dan
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#5982
·
|
|
Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements
If they've read the High Availability CloudFoundry.org page
<https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/concepts/high-availability.html> before
making a decision, then they reasonably could be.
If BOSH is not
If they've read the High Availability CloudFoundry.org page
<https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/concepts/high-availability.html> before
making a decision, then they reasonably could be.
If BOSH is not
|
By
Daniel Jones
·
#5981
·
|
|
Re: Failed to start app with diego enabled
Hi,
Thanks it is working for me know - don't know the exact reason - but I
re-deployed CF and then it start working for me for diego.
Still do not sure why that was happening - possibility
Hi,
Thanks it is working for me know - don't know the exact reason - but I
re-deployed CF and then it start working for me for diego.
Still do not sure why that was happening - possibility
|
By
Anuj Jain <anuj17280@...>
·
#5980
·
|