Hi All, The CF Buildpacks team and CAPI team are planning a coordinated effort to introduce support for applying multiple buildpacks during CF application staging. We would like to welcome any and

Chip/DrMax et al, It might be helpful for the document to introduce the topic with a clear 2016/17 definition of what is "Core CF", and what "incubating project" means. I'm personally not actually

Thanks Amit & team for looking after cf-release and it's new offspring for so long! Dr Nic _____________________________ Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 4:25 am Subject: [cf-dev] Runtime PMC -

Thanks Bernd, you make some very good points, including this one: In Chip's first response to Dr Nic he said, 'the certification process for offerings isn't about experimentation in the ecosystem.

Hello All, Pivotal would like to nominate Adam Hevenor for the Project Lead on the Loggregator project. Alan Duet has done an excellent job of keeping up with the work on the Loggregator team as

Hello All, Pivotal would like to nominate Adrian Zankich for the Project Lead on the Infrastructure project. Amit Gupta is stepping back from day to day PM duties and will be working closely with

Thanks Chip, setting deadlines helps to focus ;-) tl;dr * From our (SAP HANA Cloud Platform’s) perspective, today BOSH is the only sustainable solution to deploying and managing CF (read: new

Hello All, Pivotal would like to nominate David Sabeti for the Project Lead on the Release Integration project. Amit Gupta is stepping back from day to day PM duties and will be working closely with

Hi, This capability seems to be covered by Isolation Segments. You will be able to assign a space to have access to an Isolation Segment where the “private” stack is available. Other spaces,

Hi all! The PMC Council is considering the attached proposal to restructure the foundation's PMCs. A critical part of this proposal was a set of changes to the Development Governance and Operations

If I `cf ssh` into a (garden-runc) container, what can I run to convince myself that the memory usage reported by `cf app <some-app>` is identical to a number inside the container? Guardian says this

The use case seems reasonable to me. Even if it's technically free (no marginal cost) to let processes consume the whole machine when it's available, I can easily see a commercial and technical case

Thanks all for the great feedback so far. I don't want to halt discussion, but it would be useful for everyone to get their opinions noted by EOD tomorrow (Tuesday). -- Chip Childers VP Technology,

+Will and Julz Thoughts gents? carlo.ferraris(a)rakuten.com> wrote: -- Chip Childers VP Technology, Cloud Foundry Foundation 1.267.250.0815

Sorry, I didn't explain that very well. Let me try again. In the simplest case where you're watch it from a terminal / console, yes it would be the same. A few cases where this might be an issue:

Hi Dan, How would that experience be different if trace went to stderr? Wouldn’t the stream of HTTP messages display inline with the cli output in the same way? Regards, Dies Koper Cloud Foundry

Hi Amit, Almost immediately after posting, it did dawn on me that BOSH '2.0' manifests do strip a lot of noise, so cf-deployment will go a long way towards this. A question for Dmitriy/Matt Reider

Hey Daniel, Can you elaborate on the "BOSH cruft"? The plan is to have cf-deployment and the releases which constitute it leverage BOSH links

A short email turned into a long one. TL;DR: - Make operator documentation part of certification - Make release integration a concern of all vendors, and have them contribute resources -

I realize a big part of this thread is about BOSH, but I thought I could provide a little more context about cf-deployment <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-deployment>, in case anyone is