cf-dev@lists.cloudfoundry.org

Re: Strict CPU quotas proposal

+Will and Julz Thoughts gents? carlo.ferraris(a)rakuten.com> wrote: -- Chip Childers VP Technology, Cloud Foundry Foundation 1.267.250.0815

By Chip Childers <cchilders@...> · #5959 ·

Re: changing cf CLI trace stream from stdout to stderr

Sorry, I didn't explain that very well. Let me try again. In the simplest case where you're watch it from a terminal / console, yes it would be the same. A few cases where this might be an issue:

By Daniel Mikusa · #5958 ·

Re: changing cf CLI trace stream from stdout to stderr

Hi Dan, How would that experience be different if trace went to stderr? Wouldn’t the stream of HTTP messages display inline with the cli output in the same way? Regards, Dies Koper Cloud Foundry

By Koper, Dies <diesk@...> · #5957 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

Hi Amit, Almost immediately after posting, it did dawn on me that BOSH '2.0' manifests do strip a lot of noise, so cf-deployment will go a long way towards this. A question for Dmitriy/Matt Reider

By Daniel Jones · #5956 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

Hey Daniel, Can you elaborate on the "BOSH cruft"? The plan is to have cf-deployment and the releases which constitute it leverage BOSH links

By Amit Kumar Gupta · #5955 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

A short email turned into a long one. TL;DR: - Make operator documentation part of certification - Make release integration a concern of all vendors, and have them contribute resources -

By Daniel Jones · #5954 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

I realize a big part of this thread is about BOSH, but I thought I could provide a little more context about cf-deployment <https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-deployment>, in case anyone is

By David Sabeti · #5953 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

The consistent target from an Engineering perspective should always be the contract or interface, but should never degrade to the point of being a particular implementation. This has been damaging in

By Aaron L <aaron.lefkowitz@...> · #5952 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

I think this confusion (or misrepresentation) is best solved by the Cloud Foundry Expert Certification that Stormy Peters has coordinated. I objected initially to the mandatory inclusion of BOSH in

By Troy Topnik · #5951 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

Regarding a consistent operator experience, I believe it will differ with or without BOSH being a requirement for certification. Some vendors will choose to add layers on top of BOSH, to improve UX,

By Iovanov, Vlad Mircea · #5950 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

It's important that this community understands that the *inclusion* of BOSH in the 2017 certification would *exclude* the Stackato and ContainerCF distributions which were certified in 2016, possibly

By Troy Topnik · #5949 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

Great feedback Cornelius. Inline comments and questions for everyone below: wrote: Your points are really good. I can also see a clear argument for eventually having multiple stemcells based on

By Chip Childers <cchilders@...> · #5948 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

I think it's good to keep some flexibility and openness, especially at such integration points as the stemcell where there are defined interfaces and tests. This can help to accommodate customers

By Cornelius Schumacher · #5947 ·

Re: Failed to start app with diego enabled

See inline... Noted. It is an interesting point that this is isolated to just those circumstances. I don't think that this is a build pack error because you're not getting to the point where the

By Daniel Mikusa · #5946 ·

Re: Failed to start app with diego enabled

Hi Daniel, I tried starting the application with CF_TRACE enabled and/or checked the cc logs but did not find any thing useful yet in CF Trace only seeing generic error msg eg: 'Stager error:

By Anuj Jain <anuj17280@...> · #5945 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

What do you (or others) think would be the right approach? -- Chip Childers VP Technology, Cloud Foundry Foundation 1.267.250.0815

By Chip Childers <cchilders@...> · #5944 ·

Re: Proposal to incubate garden-hcs in the Runtime PMC

Great news! -- Chip Childers VP Technology, Cloud Foundry Foundation 1.267.250.0815

By Chip Childers <cchilders@...> · #5943 ·

Re: [IMPORTANT] 2017 PaaS Certification Requirements

What does that mean for the stemcells? Is it required to use the stemcells being officially released by the BOSH team, or is this one of the "explicitly defined plugin points" where it's ok to use

By Cornelius Schumacher · #5942 ·

Proposal to incubate garden-hcs in the Runtime PMC

Hello All, HPE would like to propose incubating the https://github.com/hpcloud/garden-hcs repo with the Greenhouse team. This repo contains source code developed by HPE to demonstrate the

By Dieu Cao <dcao@...> · #5941 ·

Private Stacks ( Stacks for limited users )

Hi all, We want "Stacks" for limited number of users. Stacks are Cloud Foundry structure, which provides base runtime environment of applications. In the current implementation of Cloud Foundry, all

By Takahito SEYAMA · #5940 ·

Messages