micro-service architecture. Yes - would like for applications to discover the URL of other applications deployed in CF . Consul is what I use right now - was wondering if CloudFoundry had something

Hi all, I'm trying to implement a service broker for cf-release v210. I implemented my service broker in cf-release v207 based on this service broker

What's the requirement that your application need to discover other application? Did you mean somethibg like say microservice architecture and you want to know the url available and any metadat /

Hi, In CF space - the applications that get deployed in warden containers - how do they discover other applications ? Should we pick a third party like Consul or Eureka, or does CF provide an

I shared one simple technique in this slide [1], see Page 20. Basically you can add ";sleep 1d" to the start command of your application, to keep the container around for one day. You can remove the

you can turn the "restart tainted containers" feature off with configuration if you are authorized to do so. then using scp to write files into a container would be persisted for the lifetime of the

What is the purpose of being able to copy a file into an instance if the instance is restarted as soon as the file has been received? Cheers, -Jan

Dear CF community, I'm pleased to announce that the Diego team is nearing completion of our initial track of work to enable SSH access to app instances running on Diego. We've recently published some

Thanks Shannon, Though James' suggestion would work if the the service bound to a route doesn't use a proxy then the order become irrelevant. It would be inconvenient to have to list all of the

This is great. Thank you, Mike. FWIW, James had the following suggestion update-route could be used to associate multiple routes, and express their chain order. We're not fixed on this UX. We'll

that's quite a release! thanks to everyone who contributed. i really like this list of packaged dependencies, that makes it very simple to see what's inside. wrote: -- Thank you, James Bayer

I would imagine you could bind a service to a route any time you want to customize incoming traffic in some way. But that customization wouldn't necessarily have to be implemented as a proxy. Here

Hi everyone, The Buildpacks team just cut a series of releases removing lucid64 binaries from the buildpacks. *Background* As announced earlier this year, the lucid64 stack ("rootfs") reached End

Initially we're targeting support for one service per route, and create-route/update-route accomplishes this simply. Associating multiple services with a route isn't as simple as binding an app as

wrote: Fair point, and thank you for the use case. Brokers have the option of declaring whether a service is bindable or not in order to provide a better user experience when services are not

Interesting idea; I'll talk to Greg O about it. Shannon Coen Product Manager, Cloud Foundry Pivotal, Inc.

This is interesting. Could you flesh this out for me? What use cases do you have in mind for associating a service instance with a route, but not providing a forwarding address? Good feedback.

There are ways to install .deb packages as a normal user, as exemplified by the following Heroku buildpack: (Please note that this buildpack will not work on CF without modifications.) You may want

I am sorry, but in order to run apt-get you need root privileges and you do not have them inside a Warden container of a DEA. Processes run as unprivileged user "vcap" who cannot gain root privileges

Hi all, I’m currently working on a project where I have my gem source in our local git enterprise server, and I need to push an app that uses it to an instance of CF (v208) that is disconnected