I am not a PHP guy at all, and I don't know if this is part of the PHP buildback, but PEAR::mail (http://pear.php.net/package/Mail) appears to support remote STMP hosts, which would obviate the need

Hi Matthew, You could use something like Zend\Mail and the Zend\Mail\Transport\Smtp, an SMTP implementation in

Hi All, One of the features of Diego I heard about a while ago, when I first heard about Diego, was the ability to restrict an application’s placement to certain availability zones / cells / etc.

Since sendmail appears to be missing from the CF stemcell, how are people sending email from PHP apps? Thanks, matt

John, Thanks again! I was able to get this working. Some notes below if anyone else is trying this out. 1.) Modified the format of logging with my app. It needs to use this exact format. @cee:

Hi, Sabha. I'm using cf-211 release and minimal_aws manifest. Em 17/06/2015 18:24, "Flávio Henrique Schuindt da Silva" < flavio.schuindt(a)gmail.com> escreveu:

Hi Cornelia, For the Cloud Foundry Summit, slides should be submitted to the Cloud Foundry Events team, events(a)cloudfoundry.org. Thank you, Vanessa -- Vanessa Heric Event Services Manager The

As the blog post explained, its possible at higher cost (due to bigger vms), as well as scalability for different components... If you want to collocate some jobs to shrink the # of vms, you would

Hummm, nice point, Cornelia. I agree with some statements in the text and I think that in the final I will really use one vm per machine, but, for now, I would like to know if is just possible to do

Warning - fewer machines does not necessarily mean lower cost: http://blog.pivotal.io/pivotal-cloud-foundry/features/does-a-reduction-in-the-number-of-vms-bring-benefits

There is no way to do this kind of thing only modifying some part oh this official tutorial? Only using this Terraform? What should I do? Thanks! 2015-06-17 16:53 GMT-03:00 Flávio Henrique Schuindt

Look into using Terraform … they have a cf-aws-tiny release that only creates 4 or 5VMs (smaller than c3.large) plus DEAs. Josh Ghiloni Senior Consultant 303.932.2202 o | 303.590.5427 m |

I succesfully deployed CF on aws using this tutorial: http://docs.cloudfoundry.org/deploying/ec2/aws_steps.html But this tutorial is kind of expensive...It creates 13 machines (one for each cf

Hey everyone, As of cf-release 212, we have moved the cf acceptance tests in cf release from "cf-release/src/acceptance-tests" to "cf-release/src/ github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-acceptance-tests". Prior

Hi Zak and Joseph, thanks for your response. Would this capability be available only for Cloud Controller API or for rest of the platform API set as well? Also, would the same capability be available

CVE-2015-1328Severity: High Vendor: Canonical Ubuntu Versions Affected: Canonical Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with 3.16 kernel Description: Philip Pettersson discovered a privilege escalation when using

Stephan, That's a lot of skew for ntp synchronized systems. I would expect them to differ by less than a second. The problem you are having could be a result. b wrote:

Hi Benjamin, Sytems are synchronized by ntp. However, time of different machines differs by a few seconds (5-20s). I am not sure how accurate ntp time sync can be or should be. Could that cause the

All: I would like to put forward a proposal to implement FIPS-compliant encryption in CloudFoundry. The proposal can be found

Hi all, We had a meeting of the Utilities PMC yesterday, permanent notes are at: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/pmc-notes/blob/master/Utilities/2015-06-16-utilities.md which I've copied into this