|
Re: DEA Monitoring Capabilities
The apiserver, listener, shredder, analyzer all produce standard Go
metrics which really don't tell you much as to the "health" of hm9000
other than the processes are up. The metrics that are
The apiserver, listener, shredder, analyzer all produce standard Go
metrics which really don't tell you much as to the "health" of hm9000
other than the processes are up. The metrics that are
|
By
Michael Fraenkel <michael.fraenkel@...>
·
#4980
·
|
|
Re: bits-service fog usage question
Hi Simon,
We use OpenStack Swift with Keystone v3 and a non-default domain. I'd just like to confirm you're planning to support that configuration too?
Regards,
Dies Koper
Fujitsu
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi Simon,
We use OpenStack Swift with Keystone v3 and a non-default domain. I'd just like to confirm you're planning to support that configuration too?
Regards,
Dies Koper
Fujitsu
Sent: Wednesday,
|
By
Koper, Dies <diesk@...>
·
#4979
·
|
|
CF CLI v6.18.1 Released Today
The CF CLI team just cut 6.18.1. Binaries and link to release notes are available at:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli#downloads
I have met some of you at the CF Summit in Santa Clara this week.
The CF CLI team just cut 6.18.1. Binaries and link to release notes are available at:
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli#downloads
I have met some of you at the CF Summit in Santa Clara this week.
|
By
Koper, Dies <diesk@...>
·
#4978
·
|
|
Re: Discussion around Autoscaling issues related to Cloudfoundry (private cloud) on vMware vSphere
Maybe you should contact the pivotal support.
https://support.pivotal.io/
wrote:
Maybe you should contact the pivotal support.
https://support.pivotal.io/
wrote:
|
By
Gwenn Etourneau
·
#4977
·
|
|
Application placement pools (the stack hack)
We're currently in the middle of the CF summit and during our presentation about the 5 years of Cloud Foundry in Rakuten we shared how we (ab)use the stack mechanism to provide application placement
We're currently in the middle of the CF summit and during our presentation about the 5 years of Cloud Foundry in Rakuten we shared how we (ab)use the stack mechanism to provide application placement
|
By
Carlo Alberto Ferraris
·
#4976
·
|
|
Discussion around Autoscaling issues related to Cloudfoundry (private cloud) on vMware vSphere
Hi I am deploying Cloudfoundry on vSphere, I am getting some issues configuring PCF autoscalling using DEA.
Has anybody encountered this issue ever ? If so can anybody please share ?
Hi I am deploying Cloudfoundry on vSphere, I am getting some issues configuring PCF autoscalling using DEA.
Has anybody encountered this issue ever ? If so can anybody please share ?
|
By
Subhabrata Sarkar
·
#4975
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
Ah, gotcha. +1 to that.
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4974
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
Agree on all counts. We've already suggested vendoring the gems inside the buildpack to ensure they're there on the staging container.
I'm now suggesting that the bin scripts just can't find the
Agree on all counts. We've already suggested vendoring the gems inside the buildpack to ensure they're there on the staging container.
I'm now suggesting that the bin scripts just can't find the
|
By
DHR
·
#4973
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
It's not an issue of pointing to the gems. The build pack runs (staging)
in it's own container. The container is completely isolated from the DEA
or Diego Cell where it's running. You can't access
It's not an issue of pointing to the gems. The build pack runs (staging)
in it's own container. The container is completely isolated from the DEA
or Diego Cell where it's running. You can't access
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4972
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
Thanks DHR Team. Yes your correct like the required gem is not available in
staging container stack. but these stacks are pre packaged in cf release.
Not sure how we can do this Gem.path update for
Thanks DHR Team. Yes your correct like the required gem is not available in
staging container stack. but these stacks are pre packaged in cf release.
Not sure how we can do this Gem.path update for
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4971
·
|
|
Re: can we externalize pivotal repository path in java buildpack??
Thanks a lot DHR team.. Let us try out this approach .
Regards
Lingesh M
Thanks a lot DHR team.. Let us try out this approach .
Regards
Lingesh M
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4970
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
So I think your problem is that your gems are on the DEA at staging time but aren't being found by the Ruby layer, right?
If so the normal approach is to point to them via an env Var (eg BUNDLE_PATH,
So I think your problem is that your gems are on the DEA at staging time but aren't being found by the Ruby layer, right?
If so the normal approach is to point to them via an env Var (eg BUNDLE_PATH,
|
By
DHR
·
#4969
·
|
|
Re: can we externalize pivotal repository path in java buildpack??
You could change the config/repository.yml to point to a DNS name on your network. Then build out one or more local repositories on your network using the Java-buildpack-dependency-builder:
You could change the config/repository.yml to point to a DNS name on your network. Then build out one or more local repositories on your network using the Java-buildpack-dependency-builder:
|
By
DHR
·
#4968
·
|
|
can we externalize pivotal repository path in java buildpack??
Hi Cloudfoundry ,
In java-buildpack ,*https://download.run.pivotal.io
<https://download.run.pivotal.io> *URL is used for
default_repository_root for all binaries , but this URL may not be
accessible
Hi Cloudfoundry ,
In java-buildpack ,*https://download.run.pivotal.io
<https://download.run.pivotal.io> *URL is used for
default_repository_root for all binaries , but this URL may not be
accessible
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4967
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
not an issue .Thanks Dan !!!
not an issue .Thanks Dan !!!
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4966
·
|
|
Re: All-In-One Virtual Machine for CF
You can take a look at https://github.com/pivotal-cf/pcfdev.
Thanks
wrote:
You can take a look at https://github.com/pivotal-cf/pcfdev.
Thanks
wrote:
|
By
Gwenn Etourneau
·
#4965
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
OK, my fault. I misunderstood what you're trying to do here. I was
thinking that your application needed the gems, but it's your build pack
that needs them.
You originally said...
because of few
OK, my fault. I misunderstood what you're trying to do here. I was
thinking that your application needed the gems, but it's your build pack
that needs them.
You originally said...
because of few
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4964
·
|
|
All-In-One Virtual Machine for CF
Hi all, sorry in advance of the maybe naif question.
I was wondering if I could find somewhere an all-In-One Virtual Machine with the last version of CF like openshift origin.
thank you in advance
Hi all, sorry in advance of the maybe naif question.
I was wondering if I could find somewhere an all-In-One Virtual Machine with the last version of CF like openshift origin.
thank you in advance
|
By
Francesco D'Andria
·
#4963
·
|
|
Re: can we install ruby gems in existing cf stacks (cflinuxfs2) without recreate stack
yes Dan,
we have used below commands to package the buildpack .
bundle install
bundle exec rake package version=custom-java-buildpack
after that we will take the zip and create a offline buildpack
yes Dan,
we have used below commands to package the buildpack .
bundle install
bundle exec rake package version=custom-java-buildpack
after that we will take the zip and create a offline buildpack
|
By
Lingesh Mouleeshwaran
·
#4962
·
|
|
Re: CVE-2016-0781 UAA Password Reset Vulnerability
yes, there has been a typo. Thank you for pointing out !
The correct CVE number is : *CVE-2016-3084*
Thanks,
Sree Tummidi
Sr. Product Manager
Identity - Pivotal Cloud
yes, there has been a typo. Thank you for pointing out !
The correct CVE number is : *CVE-2016-3084*
Thanks,
Sree Tummidi
Sr. Product Manager
Identity - Pivotal Cloud
|
By
Sree Tummidi
·
#4961
·
|