|
Re: UX proposal App manifests improvements for Routes, open for review
Follow on - a discussion/reference of this thread/proposal turned up in
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli/issues/418 (New issue In manifest,
'no-hostname' clobbers 'host' or 'hosts')
Nic
--
Dr
Follow on - a discussion/reference of this thread/proposal turned up in
https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli/issues/418 (New issue In manifest,
'no-hostname' clobbers 'host' or 'hosts')
Nic
--
Dr
|
By
Dr Nic Williams <drnicwilliams@...>
·
#4912
·
|
|
CVE-2016-3091 Diego log encoding vulnerability
CVE-2016-3091 Diego log encoding vulnerability
Severity
High
Vendor
Cloud Foundry Foundation
Versions Affected
-
Diego-release versions 0.1468.0 through 0.1470.0
Description
Due to how
CVE-2016-3091 Diego log encoding vulnerability
Severity
High
Vendor
Cloud Foundry Foundation
Versions Affected
-
Diego-release versions 0.1468.0 through 0.1470.0
Description
Due to how
|
By
Chip Childers <cchilders@...>
·
#4911
·
|
|
Removing nginx 1.8 from PHP Buildpack
The Buildpack team is planning to remove nginx 1.8 from the PHP Buildpack. 1.9 is currently the default version so this change will not affect default behavior.
The pull request for this change can
The Buildpack team is planning to remove nginx 1.8 from the PHP Buildpack. 1.9 is currently the default version so this change will not affect default behavior.
The pull request for this change can
|
By
David Jahn
·
#4910
·
|
|
Proposal: Reducing State in Service Brokers - Service Broker API Enhancement
Hello cf-dev,
I work on a team at Pivotal that builds lots of service brokers. We are currently working on broker that backs onto BOSH and want to move towards making it stateless. We have written a
Hello cf-dev,
I work on a team at Pivotal that builds lots of service brokers. We are currently working on broker that backs onto BOSH and want to move towards making it stateless. We have written a
|
By
Alex Ley
·
#4909
·
|
|
Re: Team
Sorry for the name misunderstanding... We use the word "marketplace", but not the term in CF.
The background is, firstly it is a public cloud, people use CF and the services provided by the CF; We
Sorry for the name misunderstanding... We use the word "marketplace", but not the term in CF.
The background is, firstly it is a public cloud, people use CF and the services provided by the CF; We
|
By
Layne Peng
·
#4908
·
|
|
Re: Team
Hi,
Marketplace is a CF things for CF so what is exaclty the problem you try to
solve ?
Hi,
Marketplace is a CF things for CF so what is exaclty the problem you try to
solve ?
|
By
Gwenn Etourneau
·
#4907
·
|
|
Re: Team
marketplace is CF ....
By
Gwenn Etourneau
·
#4906
·
|
|
Re: Team
Actually, we are creating the a service marketplace, and meet the same problem, too: when we add a new service from the service marketplace, it need to be registered in the CF side.
But with the
Actually, we are creating the a service marketplace, and meet the same problem, too: when we add a new service from the service marketplace, it need to be registered in the CF side.
But with the
|
By
Layne Peng
·
#4905
·
|
|
Re: How can we customized "404 Not Found"
How to reconcile these use cases:
Given one shared domain mycorp.com
And a wildcard route from that domain, *.mycorp.com
And an app mapped to the wildcard route that returns a 503
I expect that a
How to reconcile these use cases:
Given one shared domain mycorp.com
And a wildcard route from that domain, *.mycorp.com
And an app mapped to the wildcard route that returns a 503
I expect that a
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#4904
·
|
|
Re: Brokered route services only receiving traffic for routes mapped to started apps
Inline
Shannon Coen
Product Manager, Cloud Foundry
Pivotal, Inc.
CC would not be involved with route registration. CC would send the route
and the app process ID (received from Diego) to the Routing
Inline
Shannon Coen
Product Manager, Cloud Foundry
Pivotal, Inc.
CC would not be involved with route registration. CC would send the route
and the app process ID (received from Diego) to the Routing
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#4903
·
|
|
Re: Team
Hi Amulya,
Using cups for service binding has no down side because that is how
services are consumed if we ignore service broker.
Whole point of using service broker with cf is to consume service
Hi Amulya,
Using cups for service binding has no down side because that is how
services are consumed if we ignore service broker.
Whole point of using service broker with cf is to consume service
|
By
Ronak Banka
·
#4902
·
|
|
runtime-ci docker image EOL
Hey all,
*TL;DR: we have deprecated the runtime-ci Docker image, and will soon
delete it from Docker Hub.*
Thanks to Concourse, it's a cinch to build, maintain, and use Docker images
in your CI
Hey all,
*TL;DR: we have deprecated the runtime-ci Docker image, and will soon
delete it from Docker Hub.*
Thanks to Concourse, it's a cinch to build, maintain, and use Docker images
in your CI
|
By
CF Runtime
·
#4901
·
|
|
Re: Brokered route services only receiving traffic for routes mapped to started apps
Thanks a lot Shannon for your detailed response and sharing the routing
architecture plans. I realize the priorization of such effort remains a
challenge.
Out of curiosity, in step #6, how would CC
Thanks a lot Shannon for your detailed response and sharing the routing
architecture plans. I realize the priorization of such effort remains a
challenge.
Out of curiosity, in step #6, how would CC
|
By
Guillaume Berche
·
#4900
·
|
|
Re: Team
Thanks Dan,
but Services have nothing to do with cloud foundry .. the only job broker
is doing here is publishing themselves in marketplace .. wondering why it
need to be this way why not totally
Thanks Dan,
but Services have nothing to do with cloud foundry .. the only job broker
is doing here is publishing themselves in marketplace .. wondering why it
need to be this way why not totally
|
By
Amulya Sharma <amulya.sharma@...>
·
#4899
·
|
|
Re: Team
Hi Amulya,
Using user-provided-services can be a good way to manage your service
instances if it is challenging to automate provisioning, but it sounds like
one of your main hurdles is needing to
Hi Amulya,
Using user-provided-services can be a good way to manage your service
instances if it is challenging to automate provisioning, but it sounds like
one of your main hurdles is needing to
|
By
Dan Wendorf
·
#4898
·
|
|
Re: How do you get rid of a corrupt buildpack?
It was late Friday afternoon. I just deleted the VM and rebuilt it over the
weekend, but I'll retry that next time I see it.
Thanks,
Eric
It was late Friday afternoon. I just deleted the VM and rebuilt it over the
weekend, but I'll retry that next time I see it.
Thanks,
Eric
|
By
Eric Promislow
·
#4897
·
|
|
Team
Question on not using cf Service Broker or only use Private Broker,
We have Service Broker in CF its kind of hassel to maintain service brokers
as it need admin privileges to register also unique
Question on not using cf Service Broker or only use Private Broker,
We have Service Broker in CF its kind of hassel to maintain service brokers
as it need admin privileges to register also unique
|
By
Amulya Sharma <amulya.sharma@...>
·
#4896
·
|
|
Re: User defined variable "key" validation doesn't happen at cf set-env phase
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the update!
Are there any plans of bringing it to V2 APIs as well?
Kind Regards,
Padma
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the update!
Are there any plans of bringing it to V2 APIs as well?
Kind Regards,
Padma
|
By
Padmashree B
·
#4895
·
|
|
Re: aligning cf push health-check default value
Hi Nick, Eric,
I have confirmed that with the current CC release we could change the default behaviour on the CLI side without making additional API calls:
In the body of POST /v2/apps?async=true we
Hi Nick, Eric,
I have confirmed that with the current CC release we could change the default behaviour on the CLI side without making additional API calls:
In the body of POST /v2/apps?async=true we
|
By
Koper, Dies <diesk@...>
·
#4894
·
|
|
Re: User defined variable "key" validation doesn't happen at cf set-env phase
Hi Ponraj / Padma,
Apologies for the delay. I've added a story to do environment variable
validation for our upcoming V3 api:
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/119590729
Thanks,
Nick
Hi Ponraj / Padma,
Apologies for the delay. I've added a story to do environment variable
validation for our upcoming V3 api:
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/119590729
Thanks,
Nick
|
By
Nicholas Calugar
·
#4893
·
|