|
Re: User defined variable "key" validation doesn't happen at cf set-env phase
Hi Ponraj / Padma,
Apologies for the delay. I've added a story to do environment variable
validation for our upcoming V3 api:
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/119590729
Thanks,
Nick
Hi Ponraj / Padma,
Apologies for the delay. I've added a story to do environment variable
validation for our upcoming V3 api:
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/119590729
Thanks,
Nick
|
By
Nicholas Calugar
·
#4893
·
|
|
Re: How do you get rid of a corrupt buildpack?
Have you tried `cf delete-buildpack`? or `cf update-buildpack` with a new,
working binary?
Dan
wrote:
Have you tried `cf delete-buildpack`? or `cf update-buildpack` with a new,
working binary?
Dan
wrote:
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4892
·
|
|
How do you get rid of a corrupt buildpack?
I tried to upload a simple app to a local cf build, and it failed
because the go-buildpack download failed.
It turns out that the buildpack
/var/vcap/store/shared/cc-buildpacks/75/21/
I tried to upload a simple app to a local cf build, and it failed
because the go-buildpack download failed.
It turns out that the buildpack
/var/vcap/store/shared/cc-buildpacks/75/21/
|
By
Eric Promislow
·
#4891
·
|
|
Possible dropsonde breakage
Recently we made some changes to the dropsonde library. We changed some
interface types to be concrete structs. This has the possibility of
breaking some users of this library that specify types
Recently we made some changes to the dropsonde library. We changed some
interface types to be concrete structs. This has the possibility of
breaking some users of this library that specify types
|
By
Jason Keene
·
#4890
·
|
|
Re: Brokered route services only receiving traffic for routes mapped to started apps
Mike, Stefan,
I'm catching up on the 404 vs 503 thread here:
http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-How-can-we-customized-quot-404-Not-Found-quot-td4501.html#a4502
Shannon Coen
Product Manager,
Mike, Stefan,
I'm catching up on the 404 vs 503 thread here:
http://cf-dev.70369.x6.nabble.com/cf-dev-How-can-we-customized-quot-404-Not-Found-quot-td4501.html#a4502
Shannon Coen
Product Manager,
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#4889
·
|
|
Re: Brokered route services only receiving traffic for routes mapped to started apps
Hi Guillaume,
It would be great to have a chance to talk more about this at summit.
In summary, I believe supporting your use case is a large effort, and yours
in the only evidence I've heard in
Hi Guillaume,
It would be great to have a chance to talk more about this at summit.
In summary, I believe supporting your use case is a large effort, and yours
in the only evidence I've heard in
|
By
Shannon Coen
·
#4888
·
|
|
Updated and deprecated metrics for Loggregator
Hi cf-dev,
Just a quick note on metrics changes coming from Loggregator.
Currently we emit DopplerServer.dropsondeListener.receivedMessageCount and
DopplerServer.dropsondeListener.receivedByteCount.
Hi cf-dev,
Just a quick note on metrics changes coming from Loggregator.
Currently we emit DopplerServer.dropsondeListener.receivedMessageCount and
DopplerServer.dropsondeListener.receivedByteCount.
|
By
Jim CF Campbell
·
#4887
·
|
|
Re: Java Buildpack v3.7.1
Ben, perfect timing - I'm working with a company requiring JCE right now.
Thanks for this!
Duncan Winn
Cloud Foundry PCF Services
Ben, perfect timing - I'm working with a company requiring JCE right now.
Thanks for this!
Duncan Winn
Cloud Foundry PCF Services
|
By
Duncan Winn
·
#4886
·
|
|
Re: Java Buildpack v3.7.1
Congratulations and well done!
I like it when anything has the title "unlimited strength"
Congratulations and well done!
I like it when anything has the title "unlimited strength"
|
By
Josh Long <starbuxman@...>
·
#4885
·
|
|
Java Buildpack v3.7.1
I'm pleased to announce the release of the java-buildpack, version 3.7.1. This release is a dependency update highlighted by the availability of JREs with JCE Unlimited Strength encryption.
* OpenJDK
I'm pleased to announce the release of the java-buildpack, version 3.7.1. This release is a dependency update highlighted by the availability of JREs with JCE Unlimited Strength encryption.
* OpenJDK
|
By
Ben Hale <bhale@...>
·
#4884
·
|
|
Re: Spiff reloaded...
Hi Alex,
thanks for your feedback.
I’m still maintaining it. So far we have all we need, here, so I’ll add only some minor stuff. Next week there will be a new release.
I’ve tried to place
Hi Alex,
thanks for your feedback.
I’m still maintaining it. So far we have all we need, here, so I’ll add only some minor stuff. Next week there will be a new release.
I’ve tried to place
|
By
Krueger, Uwe <uwe.krueger@...>
·
#4883
·
|
|
Re: Questions of how to add projects to Cloud Foundry Community repo
Thanks you for reply. I will send you a separate email and also discuss the details of project I am proposing.
Thanks you for reply. I will send you a separate email and also discuss the details of project I am proposing.
|
By
Layne Peng
·
#4882
·
|
|
Re: Brokered route services only receiving traffic for routes mapped to started apps
Shannon,
What are your current thoughts on "maintaining routes with no backends in
the routing table" ? I quickly scanned the routing backlog few days ago
without yet finding trace of it.
I wish we
Shannon,
What are your current thoughts on "maintaining routes with no backends in
the routing table" ? I quickly scanned the routing backlog few days ago
without yet finding trace of it.
I wish we
|
By
Guillaume Berche
·
#4881
·
|
|
"Killing oom-notifier process" but without OOM
Hi
One of our NodeJS applications constantly crash with exit status 1.
I was reviewing the warden log on our DEA and I found this.
{"timestamp":1463013061.7575436,"message":"Killing
Hi
One of our NodeJS applications constantly crash with exit status 1.
I was reviewing the warden log on our DEA and I found this.
{"timestamp":1463013061.7575436,"message":"Killing
|
By
John Wong
·
#4880
·
|
|
Re: Ubuntu Xenial stemcell and rootfs plans
We all have unique perspectives that we offer each other, I appreciate the
thoughts and time you've put into formulating this alternative. I've not
spent enough to refute or agree with your proposal.
We all have unique perspectives that we offer each other, I appreciate the
thoughts and time you've put into formulating this alternative. I've not
spent enough to refute or agree with your proposal.
|
By
Danny Rosen
·
#4879
·
|
|
Re: Questions of how to add projects to Cloud Foundry Community repo
Layne, if you want to start with cloudfoundry-community then you can ask
any existing member/owner to add you, or me if you don't know anyone else
from the 160+ list.
Send me/them your github ID.
If
Layne, if you want to start with cloudfoundry-community then you can ask
any existing member/owner to add you, or me if you don't know anyone else
from the 160+ list.
Send me/them your github ID.
If
|
By
Dr Nic Williams <drnicwilliams@...>
·
#4878
·
|
|
Re: Ubuntu Xenial stemcell and rootfs plans
I respectfully disagree. Build pack binaries are nothing more than
packages (just a different format than rpm or deb). Any competent Linux
administrator should be familiar with package management
I respectfully disagree. Build pack binaries are nothing more than
packages (just a different format than rpm or deb). Any competent Linux
administrator should be familiar with package management
|
By
Daniel Mikusa
·
#4877
·
|
|
Re: Spiff reloaded...
Spiff++ looks like a good idea. I've already tried it on my home projects.
Are there any updates on your project? Do you plan to merge changes to
commonly used spiff?
------------------------
Alex
Spiff++ looks like a good idea. I've already tried it on my home projects.
Are there any updates on your project? Do you plan to merge changes to
commonly used spiff?
------------------------
Alex
|
By
Alexander Lomov <alexander.lomov@...>
·
#4876
·
|
|
Re: Ubuntu Xenial stemcell and rootfs plans
Fair enough. Though if you divorce the binary from the buildpack you
greatly increase the complexity of the environment. I think we can simplify
this conversation a bit though using our *current*
Fair enough. Though if you divorce the binary from the buildpack you
greatly increase the complexity of the environment. I think we can simplify
this conversation a bit though using our *current*
|
By
Danny Rosen
·
#4875
·
|
|
Re: Questions of how to add projects to Cloud Foundry Community repo
Hi Layne,
There are three main Cloud Foundry-related organizations in GitHub:
cloudfoundry, cloudfoundry-incubator, and cloudfoundry-community. Each
organization has many repositories. If there is
Hi Layne,
There are three main Cloud Foundry-related organizations in GitHub:
cloudfoundry, cloudfoundry-incubator, and cloudfoundry-community. Each
organization has many repositories. If there is
|
By
Amit Kumar Gupta
·
#4874
·
|