Hi all, We had a meeting of the Utilities PMC yesterday, permanent notes are at: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/pmc-notes/blob/master/Utilities/2015-06-16-utilities.md which I've copied into this

no worries, thanks for your help Craig Guillaume. wrote:

I agree with Mike. Cheers, Tammer Saleh Director of Product, Pivotal CF, London http://pivotal.io | http://tammersaleh.com | +44 7463 939332

For now, we recommend using a different system domain and app domain so that the overlap does not occur. For example, system.example.com for the system domain and apps.example.com as the apps

Agreed. Might make a good issue for the CC to not allow routes to be created that exist in the new Route API or something like that. Mike

So sorry to ask a lame question, even after all of this discussion - what is the preferred way to submit slides? Email to whom? Or CFPs if still available? wrote:

Hi Guillaume, Regrettably there was some confusion and some speakers submitted them slides via the CFP system instead of emailing them. The former is the normal behavior for the majority of our

Thank Angela for your response. I wonder whether the CFP system is properly listing speaker submitted slides, as for example my two sessions indeed have their slides attached to their associated

It is something we are thinking about for the V3 cloud controller API, but no formal decisions have been made at this point. So feedback and suggestions are certainly welcome. Zak and Joseph CF

Hi folks, I would like to start a thread on the need for machine-readable “Application Interface” supported at the platform level. Essentially, this interface describes details such as available

Thanks, Mike. I implemented and tested the second option and so far it appears to be working great. A side note: It’s a bit surprising CF allows names like api and uaa when the platform is using

I like option #2 but I wouldn't even worry about adding a --asc or native order flag until someone requests it. My biggest issue with it not being ordered is it makes it harder to find an item in a

Hey Shannon,    I have some legacy service broker that take quite a long time to create service. I’ve set “cc.broker_client_timeout_seconds to 5 mins but this is ignored because of

+1 I'd like to see even more first class Java clients for Cloud Foundry APIs be promoted. Mike

I agree. The app knows what is multi line and what isn't. So, the problem is what is the most appropriate way for the application to communicate to loggregator what should be multi-line and what

Hello Long, There is not currently a way to prevent CLI from sending the accepts_incomplete=true parameter. Could you help me understand your use cases for wanting this? Thank you! Shannon

Hey All: The CLI team has recently been chewing on ordering sets of objects like orgs and apps. We've gotten a couple PRs [0] recently related to this. I've been asking internally around CF teams

Hi Mike (Youngstrom), wrote: I think the challenge here is being able to distinguish between events that are emitted by an App log vs. a multi-line event. Only the app really would know this

Hi Stephan, Could you send us the entire log for the UAA? Madhura

Is there a way to turn off async when creating service? It seem like on v6.11.3 the post is "/v2/service_instances?accepts_incomplete=true” is there a way to disable this? Thanks, Long