|
Re: Failed to deploy diego 0.1452.0 on openstack: database_z2/0 is not running after update
Hi Adrian,
Thanks so much, I'll give it a try
Ricky Yunata
Please consider the environment before printing this email
Hi Adrian,
Thanks so much, I'll give it a try
Ricky Yunata
Please consider the environment before printing this email
|
By
Yunata, Ricky <rickyy@...>
·
#4432
·
|
|
Re: cf create-buildpack fails in v233 with error 403 Forbidden
I also found this:
root(a)fe34f4b9-37f1-4c6e-ba86-17f667ef4fa9:/var/vcap/sys/log# cat ./blobstore/internal_error.log
2016/04/02 02:26:00 [error] 404#0: *1953 access forbidden by rule, client: <bosh
I also found this:
root(a)fe34f4b9-37f1-4c6e-ba86-17f667ef4fa9:/var/vcap/sys/log# cat ./blobstore/internal_error.log
2016/04/02 02:26:00 [error] 404#0: *1953 access forbidden by rule, client: <bosh
|
By
Wayne Ha <wayne.h.ha@...>
·
#4431
·
|
|
cf create-buildpack fails in v233 with error 403 Forbidden
Hi,
I just deployed CF 233 using bosh-lite-v233.yml. After deployment, I tried create-buildpack and it failed:
cf create-buildpack noop-buildpack ./buildpack_noop-buildpack_v01.zip 1
Creating
Hi,
I just deployed CF 233 using bosh-lite-v233.yml. After deployment, I tried create-buildpack and it failed:
cf create-buildpack noop-buildpack ./buildpack_noop-buildpack_v01.zip 1
Creating
|
By
Wayne Ha <wayne.h.ha@...>
·
#4430
·
|
|
PSA: router.enable_routing_api removed
We have recently added a property 'routing_api.enabled' which indicates if
the routing-api is also deployed.
Gorouter has a property 'router.enable_routing_api' which would determine
if gorouter
We have recently added a property 'routing_api.enabled' which indicates if
the routing-api is also deployed.
Gorouter has a property 'router.enable_routing_api' which would determine
if gorouter
|
By
Mark St.Godard
·
#4429
·
|
|
Re: App running even after delete. Pointers on finding it and debugging?
JT,
Thanks for responding.
This is a test runtime and small. I checked all orgs and spaces. No routes
matching the app.
Found the route information and the result:
{
"total_results": 0,
JT,
Thanks for responding.
This is a test runtime and small. I checked all orgs and spaces. No routes
matching the app.
Found the route information and the result:
{
"total_results": 0,
|
By
Tom Sherrod <tom.sherrod@...>
·
#4428
·
|
|
Re: App running even after delete. Pointers on finding it and debugging?
Tom,
Are you sure the route isn't bound to another application in another
org/space?
When you do `cf routes` it only show routes for the current space. You can
hit specific API endpoints though to
Tom,
Are you sure the route isn't bound to another application in another
org/space?
When you do `cf routes` it only show routes for the current space. You can
hit specific API endpoints though to
|
By
JT Archie <jarchie@...>
·
#4427
·
|
|
Re: Failed to deploy diego 0.1452.0 on openstack: database_z2/0 is not running after update
Hi Ricky,
We deconstructed the certs you provided in your manifest and think that you may have missed a step when you generated your peer ssl cert. Your peer cert is missing the DNS wildcard entry
Hi Ricky,
We deconstructed the certs you provided in your manifest and think that you may have missed a step when you generated your peer ssl cert. Your peer cert is missing the DNS wildcard entry
|
By
Adrian Zankich
·
#4426
·
|
|
Re: Using swift as a blobstore in cloud foundry with keystone v3
Hi Dies, Nick,
I can confirm that a swift blobstore works with domains different than 'default'. Here is our configuration on an OpenStack Liberty
fog_connection: &fog_connection
provider:
Hi Dies, Nick,
I can confirm that a swift blobstore works with domains different than 'default'. Here is our configuration on an OpenStack Liberty
fog_connection: &fog_connection
provider:
|
By
Marco Voelz
·
#4425
·
|
|
App running even after delete. Pointers on finding it and debugging?
cf 230, diego 0.1450.0, etcd 27, garden-linux 0.330.0
Default to diego true.
Developer deployed a java application. Deleted the application: cf delete <app> No errors.
The app still responds. The
cf 230, diego 0.1450.0, etcd 27, garden-linux 0.330.0
Default to diego true.
Developer deployed a java application. Deleted the application: cf delete <app> No errors.
The app still responds. The
|
By
Tom Sherrod <tom.sherrod@...>
·
#4424
·
|
|
Re: cf v231: Issue with new webdav blobstore job
Excellent. Thanks for your investigation on this.
-Rich
Excellent. Thanks for your investigation on this.
-Rich
|
By
Rich Wohlstadter
·
#4423
·
|
|
Re: Using swift as a blobstore in cloud foundry with keystone v3
Hi Nick,
Can you try with a domain other than “default”?
We initially found that with the BOSH CPI, Keystone V3 worked for the “default” domain, but not for any other domain.
Note that the
Hi Nick,
Can you try with a domain other than “default”?
We initially found that with the BOSH CPI, Keystone V3 worked for the “default” domain, but not for any other domain.
Note that the
|
By
Koper, Dies <diesk@...>
·
#4422
·
|
|
Re: Intended UAA-specific user identity fields in JWT access token ?
Great, thanks Filip!
Guillaume.
Great, thanks Filip!
Guillaume.
|
By
Guillaume Berche
·
#4421
·
|
|
Re: Issues syncing blobs and creating releases for several releases
Hi all,
The blobs in the S3 bucket appear to be back up and running. If you
believe something is still missing please let us know and we will file a
support ticket with AWS on your
Hi all,
The blobs in the S3 bucket appear to be back up and running. If you
believe something is still missing please let us know and we will file a
support ticket with AWS on your
|
By
Claire Laurence
·
#4420
·
|
|
Issues syncing blobs and creating releases for several releases
Hi all,
Several releases, including cf-release and diego-release, use an AWS
account belonging to the Cloud Foundry Foundation to store final release
blobs. This account was accidentally closed,
Hi all,
Several releases, including cf-release and diego-release, use an AWS
account belonging to the Cloud Foundry Foundation to store final release
blobs. This account was accidentally closed,
|
By
Amit Kumar Gupta
·
#4419
·
|
|
Re: Reg the serial property
If the question can be paraphrased as "when colocating multiple job (templates) on a single VM, will they start in parallel or instead in some sort of order?" then the jobs will generally come online
If the question can be paraphrased as "when colocating multiple job (templates) on a single VM, will they start in parallel or instead in some sort of order?" then the jobs will generally come online
|
By
CF Runtime
·
#4418
·
|
|
Re: Intended UAA-specific user identity fields in JWT access token ?
yes, they are always returned.
introducing an option sounds like a good idea for the systems that wish to
turn it off, thanks for the
yes, they are always returned.
introducing an option sounds like a good idea for the systems that wish to
turn it off, thanks for the
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#4417
·
|
|
Re: Intended UAA-specific user identity fields in JWT access token ?
Thanks Filip for your answer. Wouldn't it make sense to progressively
change this behavior, possibly controlled by a configuration option to give
clients time to handle this incompatible
Thanks Filip for your answer. Wouldn't it make sense to progressively
change this behavior, possibly controlled by a configuration option to give
clients time to handle this incompatible
|
By
Guillaume Berche
·
#4416
·
|
|
Re: Cloud Controller System Domain vs App Domains
For option 2 would it not be simpler to have a single property such as
cc.blacklisted_system_domain_routes that contains the desired list and have
the CC deny route requests for those routes?
I don't
For option 2 would it not be simpler to have a single property such as
cc.blacklisted_system_domain_routes that contains the desired list and have
the CC deny route requests for those routes?
I don't
|
By
john mcteague <john.mcteague@...>
·
#4415
·
|
|
Re: Intended UAA-specific user identity fields in JWT access token ?
The access token used to double down as an identity token before OpenID
Connect was standardized, now that we have implemented id_token, we don't
really need it. but removing it would cause an
The access token used to double down as an identity token before OpenID
Connect was standardized, now that we have implemented id_token, we don't
really need it. but removing it would cause an
|
By
Filip Hanik
·
#4414
·
|
|
Intended UAA-specific user identity fields in JWT access token ?
Hi,
I wonder the rationale for apparenty uaa-specific [0] user-related fields
in the access token (username, email [1]) while they are now returned in a
standard maneer in the openidconnect id
Hi,
I wonder the rationale for apparenty uaa-specific [0] user-related fields
in the access token (username, email [1]) while they are now returned in a
standard maneer in the openidconnect id
|
By
Guillaume Berche
·
#4413
·
|