Hi David, The service broker actually uses an already existing API endpoint: https://apidocs.cloudfoundry.org/231/apps/terminate_the_running_app_instance_at_the_given_index.html It will terminate

Really cool. How nasty is the kill? Is the process killed, then CF cleans-up on healthcheck failure, or is the app instance removed from the router before instance termination?

Please direct Pivotal specific questions to Pivotal, not the open source mailing list. PWS questions can be sent to support(a)run.pivotal.io and PCF questions can be logged here:

​Of course yes, assuming you have add the director as the dns resolver in UAA job.​ MAHINDRA LIM at Cisco) <ngnanase(a)cisco.com> wrote: -- Regards, Yitao

Thanks for clarifying this for me, Amit. Warm regards Marco

Hi Amit Thanks your reply We understood the must of static IP of routers in uaa jobs. Kindly let me know if we can give the DNS entry name (hostname) of the router in the uaa job -

EDIT: Strange thing. I tried to not use a wired internet connection, and it's works. Infact i used an hotspot with my cell phone and it pushes the app to the local Cloud without any problem. Just

You can probably try to start everything in parallel, and either set very long update timeouts, or allow the deployment to fail with the expectation that it will eventually correct itself. Or you can

i am trying to push a .NET based app to cloud foundry . I have an account at https://run.pivotal.io/ and when I try to list the stacks available in my org and space, I see only cflinuxfs2 but not the

Yes, Gemfile and Gemfile.lock files are present at the top level. I can get "cf logs" output for other apps I pushed. So I think the reason that I don't see anything from "cf logs --recent" is that

Here is the output of "cf buildpacks": cf buildpacks Getting buildpacks... buildpack position enabled locked filename staticfile_buildpack 1 true false

Hello, all When pushing an application to CF, we need to define its disk/memory limitation. The memory limitation is just the possible maximum value will be needed in this application, but in most

Are your Gemfile and Gemfile.lock files literally named Gemfile and Gemfile.lock, and both checked present at the top level of the directory you're pushing from, on the machine you're pushing

This has been completed in Stacks 1.42.0 [1] [1] - https://github.com/cloudfoundry/stacks/releases/tag/1.42.0

Ning, What is the output of `cf buildpacks`? JT

Hi everybody, few days ago i've deployed Cloud Foundry locally using BOSH-Lite, and seems that all VMS deployed run without any problem. Here's a screen with the VMS and

Does NATS also need to come up before any of the other components?

Hi, Does anyone know how to debug "BuildpackCompileFailed" issue? When I push a ruby app: ======================== ... Done uploadingOK Starting app happy in org funorg / space development as

Final reminder to all. Please note that we will be implementing new approach to CAN call based on survey results which we will review briefly... Also, if you are a PM, please still update your status

follow the steps in here https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-lite/blob/master/bin/provision_cf for a working bosh-lite. key is to start with a virtualbox image. the fusion/workstation are not up to